National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$44.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Small Populations, Large Effects: Improving the Measurement of the Group Quarters Population in the American Community Survey (2012)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix F: The 10 Largest Federal Assistance Programs That Relied on ACS Total Population Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008." Small Populations, Large Effects: Improving the Measurement of the Group Quarters Population in the American Community Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
139
bottomleft bottomright
Page
139
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Summary (1-10)
1 Introduction (11-18)
2 The Group Quarters Population and the American Community Survey (19-32)
3 American Community Survey Data Products, Data Uses, and Data Needs (33-44)
4 Sampling Frame Development and Maintenance (45-62)
5 Sample Allocation and Selection (63-70)
6 Weighting and Estimation (71-94)
References (95-98)
Appendix A: Participants in the Panel's Meeting with Data Users: December 13, 2010 (99-100)
Appendix B: 2011 American Community Survey: Housing Unit Questionnaire (101-116)
Appendix C: 2011 American Community Survey: Group Quarters Questionnaire (117-124)
Appendix D: 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Data Tables That Highlight the Group Quarters Population in Virginia (125-134)
Appendix E: 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Data Tables That Highlight the Group Quarters Population in Goochland County, Virginia (135-138)
Appendix F: The 10 Largest Federal Assistance Programs That Relied on ACS Total Population Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008 (139-140)
Appendix G: The 10 Largest Federal Assistance Programs with Funds Sent Directly to Substate Areas Based on ACS Total Population Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008 (141-142)
Appendix H: Plots of Relative Differences, ACS Estimates from 2005-2009, 2007-2009, and 2009 with Expected Estimates of the Group Quarters Population in U.S. States (143-146)
Appendix I: Plots of Relative Differences, 2005-2009 ACS Estimates and 2007 Expected Estimates of the Group Quarters Population in Selected Counties by Region (147-152)
Appendix J: Plots of Relative Differences, 2005-2009 ACS Estimates and 2007 Expected Estimates of the Group Quarters Population in Selected Areas with Populations Under 20,000 (153-158)
Appendix K: Biographical Sketches of Panel Members and Staff (159-162)
Committee on National Statistics (163-164)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 139
Appendix F The 10 Largest Federal Assistance Programs That Relied on ACS Total Population Estimates, Fiscal Year 2008 CFDA Number and Fiscal Year 2008 Type of Assistance Program Name Department Expenditures Data Set and Recipient 93.778 Medical HHS $261,143,624,624 Per capita Formula grants to Assistance Program income states 84.027 Special ED $10,786,318,120 SF-3/ACS Formula grants to Education Grants to states States 84.010 Title I Grants ED $7,513,986,185 SAIPE Formula grants to to Local Educational state educational Agencies agencies (local educational agencies are subgrantees) 10.410 Very Low to USDA $7,268,193,451 MSAs Direct loans Moderate Income and guaranteed/ Housing Loans insured loans to very low- to moderate-income families 20.500 Federal DOT $4,667,272,525 Population Formula and Transit—Capital Estimates project grants to Investment Grants Program states and local (Fixed Guideway estimates governments Modernization Bus and Bus Facilities New Starts) continued 139

OCR for page 140
140 SMALL POPULATIONS, LARGE EFFECTS CFDA Number and Fiscal Year 2008 Type of Assistance Program Name Department Expenditures Data Set and Recipient 93.658 Foster Care— HHS $4,335,529,844 Per capita Formula and Title IV-E income project grants to states 84.367 Improving ED $2,798,832,364 Population Formula grants to Teacher Quality State Estimates states Grants Program estimates 14.218 Community HUD $2,570,735,980 Population Formula grants Development Block Estimates to states, Grants/Entitlement Program metropolitan Grants estimates, cities, and MSAs, area counties median income, and SF-3/ACS 10.558 Child and USDA $2,367,591,204 SF-3/ACS Formula grants Adult Care Food and SAIPE to states or Program institutions 10.760 Water and USDA $2,317,463,815 Population Formula grants to Waste Disposal Estimates counties and local Systems for Rural Program governments Communities estimates, MSAs, SF-3/ ACS, and area median income NOTES: DOT = U.S. Department of Transportation, ED = U.S. Department of Education, HHS = U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HUD = U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, MSA = metropolitan statistical area, SAIPE = Small Area Income and Poverty Es - timates Program, SF-3/ACS = Census 2000 Summary File 3/American Community Survey, USDA = U.S. Department of Agriculture. SOURCE: Taeuber and Carpenter (unpublished).