Action Item 2: Evaluate and re-certify the accuracy of the laser scanner to the correct standard with all software modifications incorporated and include in this analysis a side-by-side comparison of the laser measurements of actual back-face deformations with those taken by digital caliper to determine whether laser measurements can meet the standard of the testing protocols
The committee spent considerable time with ATC and NIJ-certified commercial testing labs to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of the digital caliper and the laser scanner. See Chapter 5 and Appendix M.
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). 2008. ASTM E29-08 Standard Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to Determine Conformance with Specifications. West Conshohocken, Pa.: ASTM International.
DOT&E (Director, Operational Test and Evaluation). 2010. Standardization of Hard Body Armor Testing. Memorandum dated April 27, 2010. Arlington, Va.: Director, Operational Test and Evaluation.
GAO (United States Government Accountability Office). 2009. GAO-10-119. Independent Expert Assessment of Army Body Armor Test Results and Procedures Needed Before Fielding. Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office.
Huber, J. 2009. Internal Operating Procedure No. 001: Measurement of Backface Deformation [BFD] Using Faro® Quantum Laser Scan Arm and Geomagic® Qualify® for Hard and Soft Body Armor. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.: Aberdeen Test Center.
NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Phase I Report on Review of the Testing of Body Armor Materials for Use by the U.S. Army: Letter Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
NRC. 2010. Phase II Report on Review of the Testing of Body Armor Materials for Use by the U.S. Army. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.