Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 19
3 The Loss of Students from STEM Majors Important Points Made by the Speaker • ore than half of students who intend to major in a science or engineering M field switch to a different major in college, and this percentage is even higher for community college students. • tudents who take fewer STEM classes their first semester are more likely S to switch from STEM majors. • he culture of STEM education and potential earnings in the workplace ap- T pear to be significant factors in students’ decisions to remain in or abandon STEM majors. Students who intend to work as scientists, technicians, engineers, or mathematicians typically choose to major in a STEM field in college. Study of the choices students make regarding majors both before and dur- ing college therefore can reveal important information about the future U.S. workforce. Eric Bettinger, associate professor for education and economics at Stanford University, has used data from Ohio to analyze students’ choices of majors and how those decisions change over the course of a two-year and four-year education (Bettinger, 2010). His data are from the 1998–1999 cohort of incoming students, which allowed him to follow their choices in subsequent years, and the data focus solely on students who took the ACT exam, which is the exam taken by most college-bound students in Ohio. Students who take that exam indicate the major they would like to 19
OCR for page 20
20 COMMUNITY COLLEGES IN THE EVOLVING STEM EDUCATION LANDSCAPE pursue, and the exam results allow high-ability students to be identified and analyzed separately. In a total sample of 18,000 students, 8.0 percent and 11.7 percent indi- cated an interest in the biological or physical sciences and engineering, respectively. Bettinger found, in an analysis conducted for the summit, that these numbers were somewhat lower for the students who attended two-year colleges—5.5 percent and 9.4 percent. In contrast, the percent - ages were higher for students with high ACT scores (above 24)—11.7 per- cent and 18.0 percent. The students at two-year institutions had somewhat lower average ACT scores than the average for all students, but in broad terms their aspirations and characteristics were similar, Bettinger said. STUDENTS WHO LEAVE AND ENTER STEM MAJORS A “depressing” number of students abandon STEM majors, Bettinger observed. Among all students who declared an intention to pursue a STEM major, only 43 percent were still in a STEM field at the time of their last enrollment, with the rest moving to other majors by the time of their last enrollment. The numbers were far worse for two-year students. Only 14 percent of the students at two-year colleges who intended to major in a STEM field when they took the ACT exam were still in a STEM field at the time of their last enrollment. “This defection rate is extremely high,” said Bettinger. Almost one-half of all students who leave STEM majors switch to business majors (48.7%). Other popular majors for students who switch are the social sciences (21.2%) and education (11.1%). Among two-year switchers, about 30 percent switch to business majors, and slightly less than one-quarter each go to social science and education majors. Meanwhile, very few students who did not intend to major in a STEM subject converted to a STEM major. Only 5.5 percent of STEM majors for students at all institutions, and only 3.4 percent for two-year students, were converts to STEM from a non-STEM major. WHY DO STUDENTS LEAVE STEM MAJORS? Bettinger listed five possible reasons for the relative lack of U.S. stu- dents pursuing STEM majors in two-year and four-year institutions: 1. At the end of secondary school, few are prepared to enter STEM fields. 2. Few express initial interest in entering STEM fields.
OCR for page 21
21 THE LOSS OF STUDENTS FROM STEM MAJORS 3. Once students are off the STEM pathway, they cannot get back on it. 4. The culture of STEM fields is off-putting once higher education is reached. 5. The returns are insufficiently high to justify greater adherence to STEM fields. He noted that his data are best suited to explore the last three of these explanations. Students started switching away from STEM majors in their very first semester, and the students most likely to leave STEM majors were the ones who took fewer STEM courses their first semester rather than more courses. Students who took more than 40 percent of their courses in STEM their first semester were much less likely to leave the major than students who took less than 40 percent of their courses in STEM fields. This observation holds for students in four-year colleges, students in two-year colleges, and high-ability students. The relatively small number of students who converted to STEM majors also took relatively few STEM courses their first semester. This piece of evidence is “suggestive,” said Bettinger, that there might be some way of getting more non-STEM majors interested in those subjects—for example, by examining more closely the structure and conduct of intro- ductory courses in STEM. However, STEM majors have extensive course requirements, and many courses typically must be taken in a particular order (that is, they have extensive prerequisites compared with other dis - ciplines), which can make it difficult to switch into these majors. The students who left STEM were just as likely to pass their initial STEM courses, so the difficulty of the courses did not seem to be the deciding factor. But the course demands of STEM majors are high and require commitment—even though, as Bettinger observed, some of the majors to which students switch, such as education, also have extensive course requirements, even if they are not as sequential as those for STEM majors. THE CULTURE OF STEM FIELDS Bettinger’s data also show that women were significantly less likely to stay in STEM fields, even among the top students, which suggests that the culture of STEM might have been a factor in their decisions. However, since the female students took STEM courses in high school and still expressed an interest in majoring in those subjects, the cultural problems would need to start or intensify in college for this explanation to hold. According to Bettinger’s research, black students in four-year colleges were less likely to defect from STEM majors than other students, espe -
OCR for page 22
22 COMMUNITY COLLEGES IN THE EVOLVING STEM EDUCATION LANDSCAPE cially among the top black students. However, that was not true at two- year colleges, where there were no statistical differences between black students and other students. Bettinger did not analyze the differences in these indicators between men and women or between domestic and inter- national students, though both of these factors could influence the results. EARNINGS FROM MAJORS One factor in students’ decisions about majors is the amount of money they potentially could earn after graduation. About three-quarters of col - lege students respond in surveys that an important objective of a college education is to be “well off financially” (Pryor et al., 2011), and colleges have an increased focus on vocational offerings, particularly at two-year colleges. The data suggest that students who switch to a non-STEM major could have been making a calculated decision about where the financial return to a major might be higher than with a STEM major, Bettinger said. For example, women’s earnings in business and in other fields were higher than they were in STEM fields at the time these data were gath - ered, though men’s earnings in STEM fields, business, and the social sci- ences were roughly the same. High average earnings indicate similarly high levels of demand for workers, and superstar earnings indicate a demand for a large pool of professionals to produce a small number of superstars. For example, computer science, which is a field with obvious earnings growth and superstar earnings, was experiencing a substantial growth in majors at the time the data were gathered, Bettinger noted. DISCUSSION During one of the discussion periods at the summit, Catherine Didion from the National Academy of Engineering pointed out that underrepre- sented students and women are interested in giving back to their com- munities but often do not see STEM fields as occupations that enable them to do so. Additional investigations could indicate why so many of these students switch into non-STEM fields. Martha Kanter, under secretary at the U.S. Department of Educa- tion, emphasized the importance of mentors and advisers in keeping students on track. Many students take courses they do not need, or they have unclear pathways. Students need sophisticated and knowledgeable advice. “Students get lost in the system,” said Kanter. “We have to use technology and people to keep them in the system and keep them highly motivated to succeed.”