CHALLENGES IN
CHEMISTRY
GRADUATE
EDUCATION
A WORKSHOP SUMMARY
Committee on Challenges in Chemistry Graduate Education
Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
Division on Earth and Life Studies
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
CHALLENGES IN
CHEMISTRY
GRADUATE
EDUCATION
A WORKSHOP SUMMARY
Committee on Challenges in Chemistry Graduate Education
Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
Division on Earth and Life Studies
OCR for page R1
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Gov-
erning Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from
the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engi -
neering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible
for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for
appropriate balance.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation
under award number CHE-1147410, and by the National Institutes of Health
under award number N01-OD-4-2139, TO#273.
The report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the
United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency
thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or
assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use -
fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents
that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any
specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manu-
facturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency
thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily
state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this pub -
lication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.
International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-25708-4
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-25708-5
Additional copies of this report are available for sale from the National Academies
Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or
(202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu/.
Copyright 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America
OCR for page R1
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating
society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research,
dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the
general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress
in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal govern -
ment on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the
National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter
of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding
engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its mem -
bers, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advis -
ing the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors
engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education
and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles
M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of
Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions
in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The
Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences
by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon
its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education.
Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of
Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology
with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal
government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the
Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the
National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in pro -
viding services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering
communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the
Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and
vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.
www.national-academies.org
OCR for page R1
OCR for page R1
COMMITTEE ON CHALLENGES IN
CHEMISTRY GRADUATE EDUCATION
JOSEPH S. FRANCISCO (Chair), Purdue University, West Lafayette,
Indiana
ROBERT G. BERGMAN, University of California, Berkeley
CHARLES T. KRESGE, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan
DOUGLAS RAY, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,
Washington
Staff
SHEENA SIDDIQUI, Senior Program Associate
AMANDA CLINE, Administrative Assistant
DOUGLAS FRIEDMAN, Program Officer
RACHEL YANCEY, Senior Program Assistant
DOROTHY ZOLANDZ, Board Director
v
OCR for page R1
BOARD ON CHEMICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY
PABLO DEBENEDETTI (Co-chair), Princeton University, New Jersey
C. DALE POULTER (Co-chair), University of Utah, Salt Lake City
ZHENAN BAO, Stanford University, California
ROBERT BERGMAN, University of California, Berkeley
HENRY BRYNDZA, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company,
Wilmington, Delaware
EMILY CARTER, Princeton University, New Jersey
MARY JANE HAGENSON, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LLC,
The Woodlands, Texas
CAROL J. HENRY, The George Washington University, Washington,
D.C.
JILL HRUBY, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico
CHARLES E. KOLB, Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts
JOSEF MICHL, University of Colorado, Boulder
MARK A. RATNER, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
ROBERT E. ROBERTS, Institute for Defense Analyses, Washington, D.C.
DARLENE J. S. SOLOMON, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara,
California
ERIK J. SORENSEN, Princeton University, New Jersey
JEAN TOM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, West Windsor, New Jersey
WILLIAM C. TROGLER, University of California, San Diego
DAVID WALT, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
Staff
DOROTHY ZOLANDZ, Director
AMANDA CLINE, Administrative Assistant
DOUGLAS FRIEDMAN, Program Officer
KATHRYN HUGHES, Program Officer
TINA M. MASCIANGIOLI, Senior Program Officer
SHEENA SIDDIQUI, Senior Program Associate
RACHEL YANCEY, Senior Program Assistant
vi
OCR for page R1
Acknowledgment of Reviewers
This workshop report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals
chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accor-
dance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s
Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is
to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in
making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the
report meets institutional standards for clarity, objectivity, and responsive-
ness to the charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain
confidential to protect the integrity of the process. We wish to thank the
following individuals for their review of this workshop report:
Ryan Dirkx, Arkema Inc.
Michael Doyle, University of Maryland
Robert Grubbs, California Institute of Technology
William Lee Olbricht, Cornell University
George Whitesides, Harvard University
Although the reviewers listed above have provided many construc-
tive comments and suggestions, they did not see the final draft of the
workshop report before its release. The review of this report was overseen
by Thomas H. Dunning, Jr., University of Illinois. Appointed by the
National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that
an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance
with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully
considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely
with the authors and the institution.
vii
OCR for page R1
OCR for page R1
Contents
1
1 Introduction
Organization of Report, 2
Questions to be Answered, 2
2 The Nature of the Challenge 5
Worrisome Trends, 5
What Needs to Change?, 8
The Perspective from University Administrators, 13
The Problem of Attrition, 16
Experiments in Chemistry Graduate Education, 17
3 Goals of Chemistry Graduate Education 23
The Changing Roles of Universities, 23
Breadth Versus Depth, 26
The Expectations of Students and Faculty Members, 27
4 Skills Taught in Chemistry Graduate Education 29
The Perspective from New Faculty Members, 29
The Perspective from Industry Representatives, 34
The Perspectives of Young Industrial Chemists, 38
The Perspective from Other Sectors, 40
The Perspective from a Venture Capitalist, 42
ix
OCR for page R1
x CONTENTS
5 Structure of Chemistry Graduate Education 47
Master’s Degrees and Doctoral Degrees, 47
Funding of Graduate Students, 49
Engaging in Interdisciplinary Research, 50
Partnerships with Industry, 52
Institutional Change, 53
Building on Strengths, 54
6 Suggested Ideas to Change Chemistry Graduate Education and
55
Skills to Benefit Students
Ideas for Change Focused on Students and Faculty Members, 55
Ideas for Change Focused on Department Chairs, Deans, and
Other Research Administrators, 57
References 59
Appendixes
A Statement of Task 61
B Workshop Agenda 63
C Biographical Information 67
D Workshop Attendees 83