This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s (NRC’s) Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Eric Barron, Florida State University, Tallahassee
Amy Braverman, NASA JPL, Los Angeles, California
Antonio Busalacchi, University of Maryland, College Park
Jack Dongarra, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Lisa Goddard, International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Palisades, New York
Isaac M. Held, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, New Jersey
Wayne Higgins, NCEP/NOAA, Camp Springs, Maryland
Anthony Leonard, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
John Michalakes, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
John Mitchell, UK Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom
Gavin Schmidt, NASA/Real Climate, New York, New York
Andrew Weaver, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Richard N. Wright, Practice, Education and Research for Sustainable Infrastructure, Washington, D.C.
Although the reviewers listed above have provided constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the views of the committee, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Dr. Robert Frosch, Harvard University, appointed by the NRC Report Review Committee, who was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring panel and the institution.