REFERENCES

Charles, J. B. 2012. Scientific merit assessment of directed research tasks within the NASA Human Research Program. PowerPoint Presentation at the IOM Workshop on Evaluating the Scientific Merit of Directed Research Proposals, March 28, http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Research/NASA Review/NASA%20Presentation.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

Demicheli, V., and C. Di Pietrantonj. 2007. Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2:MR000003.

Friedl, K. E. 2005. Biomedical research on health and performance of military women: Accomplishments of the Defense Women’s Health Research Program (DWHRP). Journal of Women’s Health 14(9):764-802.

NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2009. Human Research Program: 2009 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/437981 main_2009_HRP_Annual_Report.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2010. Human Research Program: 2010 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/518001main_HRP_Annual_Report_2010.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011a. Human Research Program: 2011 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/614253main_HRP-Annual-Report-2011.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011b. Human Research Program: Integrated research plan. July 2011, Revision C. http://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/IRP%20Rev%20C.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011c. Human Research Program: Science management plan. May 12, 2011, Revision D. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/611217main_Human%20Research%20 Program%20Science%20Management%20Plan.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2011d. Human Research Program: Unique processes, criteria, and guidelines. July 28, 2011, Revision C. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110014960_2011015698.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012).

———. 2012a. Human Research Roadmap: Tasks. http://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/tasks/ (accessed May 10, 2012).

———. 2012b. Human Research Program: Human health and safety. http://www.nasa. gov/exploration/humanresearch/index.html (accessed April 30, 2012).

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2008. National Institutes of Health 2007-2008 peer review self-study: Final draft. http://enhancing-peer-review-nih.gov/meetings/NIHPeerReviewReportFINALDRAFT.pdf (accessed May 1, 2012).

NRC (National Research Council). 1995. On peer review in NASA Life Sciences programs: Letter report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

———. 1998. Peer review in environmental technology development programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 25
25 LETTER REPORT REFERENCES Charles, J. B. 2012. Scientific merit assessment of directed research tasks within the NASA Human Research Program. PowerPoint Presentation at the IOM Workshop on Evaluating the Scientific Merit of Directed Research Proposals, March 28, http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/Research/NASA Review/NASA%20Presentation.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). Demicheli, V., and C. Di Pietrantonj. 2007. Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2:MR000003. Friedl, K. E. 2005. Biomedical research on health and performance of military women: Accomplishments of the Defense Women’s Health Research Program (DWHRP). Journal of Women’s Health 14(9):764-802. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2009. Human Research Program: 2009 annual report. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/437981 main_2009_HRP_Annual_Report.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). ———. 2010. Human Research Program: 2010 annual report. http://www. nasa.gov/pdf/518001main_HRP_Annual_Report_2010.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). ———. 2011a. Human Research Program: 2011 annual report. http://www. nasa.gov/pdf/614253main_HRP-Annual-Report-2011.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). ———. 2011b. Human Research Program: Integrated research plan. July 2011, Revision C. http://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/evidence/IRP%20Rev% 20C.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). ———. 2011c. Human Research Program: Science management plan. May 12, 2011, Revision D. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/611217main_Human%20Research%20 Program%20Science%20Management%20Plan.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). ———. 2011d. Human Research Program: Unique processes, criteria, and guidelines. July 28, 2011, Revision C. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs. nasa.gov/20110014960_2011015698.pdf (accessed April 30, 2012). ———. 2012a. Human Research Roadmap: Tasks. http://humanresearch roadmap.nasa.gov/tasks/ (accessed May 10, 2012). ———. 2012b. Human Research Program: Human health and safety. http://www.nasa. gov/exploration/humanresearch/index.html (accessed April 30, 2012). NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2008. National Institutes of Health 2007-2008 peer review self-study: Final draft. http://enhancing-peer-review-nih.gov/ meetings/NIHPeerReviewReportFINALDRAFT.pdf (accessed May 1, 2012). NRC (National Research Council). 1995. On peer review in NASA Life Sciences programs: Letter report. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. ———. 1998. Peer review in environmental technology development programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 25
26 A REVIEW OF NASA HRP’S SCIENTIFIC MERIT ASSESSMENT PROCESSES NSF (National Science Foundation). 2004. Grant proprosal guide: NSF 04-23 September 2004. Chapter III: NSF proposal processing and review. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/nsf04_23/3.jsp (accessed May 7, 2012). USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2001. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; request for proposals: Special Research Grants Program, Citrus Tristeza Research. Federal Register 66(13):6208- 6215. Wood, F., and S. Wessely. 2003. Peer review of grant applications: A systematic review. In Peer review in health sciences. 2nd ed., edited by F. Godlee and T. Jefferson. London, UK: BMJ Books. Pp. 14-44.