Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 77
References Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2012). Translating Research into Practice (TRIP)-II. Available: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/trip2fac.htm [July 2012]. Anderson, J.R., Reder, L.M., and Simon, H.A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11. Avey, P.C., Desch, M.C., Maliniak, D., Long, J.D., Peterson, S., and Tierney, M.J. (2012). The beltway vs. the ivory tower: Why academics and policy makers don't get along. Foreign Policy, January/February. Available: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/ the_beltway_vs_the_ivory_tower [July 2012]. Bach, P.S. (2012). The trouble with "Doctor Knows Best." Health Section, The New York Times, June 5, p. D5. Ball, W.J. (1995). A pragmatic framework for the evaluation of policy arguments. Policy Stud- ies Review, 14(1/2), 1-24. Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bazerman, M.H., and Moore, D.A. (2008). Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: Wiley. Berry, B.J.L., Kiel, L.D., and Elliott, E. (2002). Adaptive agents, intelligence, and emergent human organization: Capturing complexity through agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Supp. 3), 7,187-7,188. Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C., and Weller, B. (2010). Public policy and saving for retirement: The autosave features of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. In J.J. Siegfried (Ed.), Better Living Through Economics (pp. 274-288). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bogenschneider, K., and Corbett, T.J. (2010). Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policymakers. New York: Routledge. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 77
OCR for page 78
78 USING SCIENCE AS EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC POLICY Bradburn, N. (2004). What can public policies do? In OECD Directorate for Science, Tech- nology, and Industry, Re-Inventing the Social Sciences. Paris: OECD. Available: http:// www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_2649_34269_33695705_1_1_1_1,00.html [July 2012]. Braybrooke, D., and Lindblom, C. (1963). A Strategy of Decision. New York: The Free Press. Brewer, G.D., and deLeon, P. (1983). The Foundation of Policy Analysis. Chicago: Dorsey. Bryk, A.S., Gomez, L.M., and Grunow, A. (2011). Getting ideas into action: Building net- worked improvement communities in education. In M.T. Hallinan (Ed.), Frontiers in Sociology of Education (pp. 127-162). New York: Springer. Campbell, D.T. (1975). The social scientist as methodological servant of the experiment- ing society. In S.S. Nagel (Ed.), Policy Studies and the Social Sciences (pp. 27-32). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Caplan, N. (1979). The two communities theory and knowledge utilization. American Be- havioral Scientist, 22(3), 459-470. Carr, P., Dogan, E., Tirre, W., and Walton, E. (2007). Large-scale indicator assessments: What every educational policymaker should know. In P.A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and Decision Making, 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part I, pp. 321-339). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Carrington, P., Scott, J., and Wasserman, S. (Eds.). (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cartwright, N.D. (2011). Predicting what will happen when we act: What counts as warrant? Preventive Medicine, 53(4), 221-224. Center for Responsive Politics. (2011). Lobbying Database. Available: http://www.opensecrets. org/lobby/ [August 2012]. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2007). A Science-Based Framework for Early Childhood Policy: Using Evidence to Improve Outcomes in Learning, Behavior, and Health for Vulnerable Children. Available: http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu [July 2012]. Chelimsky, E. (1991) Politics, policy making, data, and the homeless. Housing Policy Debate, 2(3), 683-697. Christakis, N.A., and Fowler, J.H. (2009). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little, Brown and Company. Coburn, C.E., Honig, M.I., and Stein, M.K. (in press). What is the evidence on districts' use of evidence? In J. Bransford, L. Gomez, D. Lam, and N. Vye (Eds.), Research and Practice: Towards a Reconciliation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press. Cochrane, A.L. (1972). Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections of Health Services. London, UK: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. Cohen, D.M., and Garet, M. (1975). Reforming educational policy with applied social research. Harvard Educational Review, 45, 17-43. Cohen, K., and Lindblom, C. (1979) Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Coleman, J.S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- ment of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education. Common, R. (2004). Organisational learning in a political environment. Policy Studies Journal, 25(1), 35-49.
OCR for page 79
REFERENCES 79 Congdon, W.J., and Kling, J.R. (2011). Policy and Choice Public Finance Through the Lens of Behavioral Economics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Conklin, A., Hallsworth, H., Hatziandreu, E., and Grant, J. (2008). Briefing on Linkage and Exchange: Facilitating Diffusion of Innovation in Health Services. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Consortium of Social Science Associations. (2011). Systems science and health in the behavioral and social sciences: Applications wanted. COSSA Washington Update, 30 (16). Available: http://archive.constantcontact.com/fs021/1102766514430/ archive/1107597363026.html [August 2012]. Contandriopoulos, D., Lemire, M., Denis, J-L., and Tremblay, E. (2010). Knowledge ex- change processes in organizations and policy arenas: A narrative systematic review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 444-483. Cooksey, R.W. (1996). Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. San Diego: Academic Press. Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.M., and Smith, P.C. (2000). What Works: Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press. Dehue, T. (2001). Establishing the experimenting society: The historical origin of social experimentation according to the randomized controlled design. American Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 283-302. DeLeon, P. (1988). Advice and Consent: The Development of the Policy Sciences. New York: Russell Sage. Dobbins, M., Robeson, P., Ciliska, D., Hanna, S., Cameron, R., O'Mara, L., DeCorby, K., and Mercer, S. (2009a). A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implementation Science, 4, 23. Available: http://www.implementationscience.com/ content/4/1/23 [August 2012]. Dobbins, M., Hanna, S.E., Ciliska, D., Manske, S., Cameron, R., Mercer, S.L., O'Mara, L., DeCorby, K., and Robeson, P. (2009b). A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies. Implementation Science, 4, 61. Available: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/4/1/61 [August 2012]. Drolet, B.C., and Lorenzi, N.M. (2011). Translational research: understanding the con- tinuum from bench to bedside. Translational Research, 157(1), 1-5. Dryzek, J.S., and Bobrow, D.B. (1987). Policy Analysis by Design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Dunn, W.N. (1990). Justifying policy arguments: Criteria for practical discourse. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13(3), 321-329. Dunworth, T., Hannaway, J., Holanhan, J., and Turner, M.A. (2008). The Case for Evidence- Based Policy: Beyond Ideology, Politics, and Guesswork (revised edition). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Available: http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=901189 [July 2012]. Easterby-Smith, M. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Jour- nal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783-796. Elsbach, K.D., Barr, P.S., and Hargadon, A.B. (2005). Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16(4), 422-433. Eoyang, G.H., and Berkas, T.H. (2007). Evaluation in a complex adaptive system. In B. Williams and I. Inman (Eds,), Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Point Reyes Station, CA: Edge Press.
OCR for page 80
80 USING SCIENCE AS EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC POLICY Epstein, J. (2006). Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Esterling, K.M. (2004). The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Fealing, K.H., Lane, J.I., Marburger, J.H., and Shipp, S.S. (Eds.) (2011). The Science of Sci- ence Policy: A Handbook. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Feller, I. (2011). Science of science and innovation policy: The emerging community of practice. In K.H. Fealing, J.I. Lane, J.H. Marburger, and S.S. Shipp (Eds.), The Science of Science Policy: A Handbook (Ch. 8). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Finkelstein, A., Taubman, S., Wright, B., Bernstein, M., Gruber, J., Newhouse, J.P., Allen, H., Baicker, K., and Oregon Health Study Group (2012). The Oregon health insurance experiment: Evidence from the first year. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1,057-1,106. Fischer, F. (1980). Politics, Values and Public Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Fischer, F. (2007). Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: Integrating empirical and normative arguments. In F. Fischer, G. Miller, and M.S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods (pp. 223-236). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Fischer, F., and Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Flexner, A. (1910). Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carn- egie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Available: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/sites/ default/files/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf [July 2012]. Floden, R.E., and Weiner, S.S. (1978). Rationality to ritual: The multiple roles of evaluation in governmental processes. Policy Sciences, 9, 9-18. Fosdick, R.B. (1952). The Story of the Rockefeller Foundation. New York: Harper & Brothers. Frantilla, A. (1998). Social Science in the Public Interest: A Fiftieth-year History of the Institute for Social Research. Issue 45 of the Bentley Historical Library Bulletin. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Bentley Historical Library. Fuhrman, S. (1994). Uniting producers and consumers: Challenges in creating and utilizing educational research and development. In T.M. Tomlinson and A.C. Tuijnam (Eds.), Educational Research and Reform: An International Perspective. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Gasper, D. (1996). Analyzing policy arguments. European Journal of Development Research, 18(1), 36-62. Gazzanaga, M.S. (2008). Human: The Science Behind What Makes Us Unique. New York: HarperCollins. Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwarz, L.M., and Woloshin, S. (2008). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Sciences in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53-96. Gilson, C., Dunleavy, P., and Tinkler, J. (2009). Organizational Learning in Government Sector Organizations: Literature Review. London, UK: LSE Policy Group. Glasgow, R.E., and Emmons, K.M. (2007). How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annual Review of Public Health, 28(4), 13-33.
OCR for page 81
REFERENCES 81 Goldgeier, J.M., and Tetlock, P.E. (2001). Psychology and international relations theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 67-92. Gordon, R.A. and Howell, J.E. (1959). Higher Education for Business. Ford Foundation. New York: Columbia University Press. Goren, P. (2012). Data, data, and more data--What's an educator to do? American Journal of Education, 118(2), 233-237. Gormley, W.T., Jr. (2011). From science to policy in early childhood education. Science, 333(6,045), 978-981. Green, L.A., and Seifert, C.M. (2005). Translation of research into practice: Why we can't "just do it." Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 18(6), 541-545. Green, L.W. (2006). Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 406-409. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O., Macfarlane, F., and Peacock, R. (2004). How to Spread Good Ideas: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Diffusion, Dissemina- tion, and Sustainability of Innovations in Health Service Delivery and Organisation. Lon- don, UK: National Coordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation. Greeno, J.G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psycholo- gist, 53(1), 5-26. Grozer, T. (2009). Learning to reason about evidence and explanations: Promising directions in education. In E. Callan, T. Grozer, J. Kagan, R.E. Nisbett, D.N. Perkins, and L.S. Shulman (Eds.), Education and Civil Society: Teaching Evidence-Based Decision Making (pp. 51-74). Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Guston, D.H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press. Guttentag, M., and Struening, E.L. (Eds.). (1975). Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hajer, M., and Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Networked Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hambrick, R.S. (1974). A guide for the analysis of policy arguments. Policy Science, 5(4), 469-478. Hammond, K.R. (1996). Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevi- table Error, Unavoidable Injustice. New York: Oxford University Press. Hargreaves, M. (2010). Evaluating System Change: A Planning Guide. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Heckman, J.J., and Vytlacil, E. (2005). Structural equations, treatment effects, and econo- metric policy evaluation. Econometrics, 73(3), 669-738. Henig, J.R. (2009). Politicization of evidence: Lessons for an informed democracy. Educa- tional Policy, 23(1), 137-160. Henig, J.R. (in press). The politics of data use. Teachers College Record, 114(11), Special Issue, A. Bueschel and C. Coburn, Eds. Hoppe. R. (1999). Policy analysis, science, and politics: From "speaking truth to power" to "making sense together." Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 201-210. Huberman, M., and Cox, P. (1990). Evaluation utilization: Building links between action and reflection. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16, 157-179.
OCR for page 82
82 USING SCIENCE AS EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC POLICY Hutchinson, J., and Huberman, M. (1993, May). Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization in Science and Mathematics Education: A Literature Review. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Institute of Medicine. (2007). The Learning Healthcare System. Workshop Summary. L.A. Olsen, D. Aisner, and J.M. McGinnis, Eds. Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (2010a). Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Frame- work to Inform Decision Making. Committee on an Evidence Framework for Obesity Prevention Decision Making, S.K. Kumanyika, L. Parker, and L.J. Sim, Eds. Food and Nutrition Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (2010b). Redesigning the Clinical Effectiveness Research Paradigm: Inno- vation and Practice-Based Approaches, Workshop Summary. L. Olsen and J.M. M cGinnis, Eds. Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine (2011a). Engineering a Learning Healthcare System: A Look at the Future, Workshop Summary. C. Grossmann, W.A. Goolsby, L. Olsen, and J.M. McGinnis, Eds. Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine (2011b). Patients Charting the Course: Citizen Engagement in the Learning Health System, Workshop Summary. L. Olsen, R.S. Saunders, and J.M. McGinnis, Eds. and Rapporteurs. Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. London, UK: Routledge. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C., and Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (revised edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ. Princ- eton University Press. Jervis, R. (1997). System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princ- eton University Press. Johnson, K., Greenseid, L.O., Toal, S.A., King, J.A., Lawrenz, F., and Volkov, B. (2009). Research on evaluation use: A review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 377-410. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Kahneman, D., and Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515-526. Kahneman, D., Lovalo, D., and Sibony, O. (2011). The big idea: Before you make that big decision. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 50-60. Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown. Kivetz, R., Netzer, O., and Schrift, R. (2008). The synthesis of preference: Bridging behavior- al decision research and marketing science. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 179-186. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
OCR for page 83
REFERENCES 83 Klein, G., Oransanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C.E. (1993). Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Landry, R., Amara, N., and Lamari, M. (2001). Utilization of social science research knowl- edge in Canada. Research Policy, 30(2), 333-349. Lau, R.R., and Levy, J.S. (1998). Contributions of behavioural decision theory to political science. Applied Psychology, 47(1), 29-44. Lavis, J.N. (2006). Research, public policymaking, and knowledge-translation processes: Canadian efforts to build bridges. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Profes- sions, 26(1), 37-45. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., and Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5,915), 721-723. Leeuw, F.L., Rist, R.C., and Sonnichsen, R.C. (Eds.) (1994). Can Governments Learn?: Comparative Perspectives on Evaluation and Organizational Learning. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Leischow, S.J., Best, A., Trochim, W.M., Clark, P.I., Gallagher, R.S., Marcus, S.E., and Matthews, E. (2008). Systems thinking to improve the public's health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2S), S196-S203. Leviton, L.C., and Hughes, E.F.X. (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluations: A review and synthesis. Evaluation Review, 5, 524-548. Lewis, K., and Burd-Sharps, S. (2010). The Measure of America 2010-2011: Mapping Risks and Resilience. New York: New York University Press and Social Science Research Council. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88. Lindblom, G.E. (1968). The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Louis, K.S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M.E., and Stoto, M.A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131. Lowrey, A. (2011). Programs that tie funds to effectiveness are at risk. The New York Times, p. A13, December 3. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/03/us/politics/ programs-tying-us-funds-to-effectiveness-are-at-risk.html?_r=0 [October 2012]. Lynd, R.S. (1939). Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Manzer, R. (1984). Public policymaking as practical reasoning. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 17(3), 577-594. Marrett, C. (2011). The Merit Review Process: Ensuring Limited Federal Resources Are In- vested in the Best Science. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, Committee on Science, Space, Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, July 26. Available: http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/ documents/hearings/072611_Marrett.pdf [July 2012]. Marston, G., and Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: A critical appraisal of evidence-based policy making, The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3(3), 143-163.
OCR for page 84
84 USING SCIENCE AS EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC POLICY McDonnell, L.M. (2009). Repositioning politics in education's circle of knowledge. Educa- tional Researcher, 38(6), 417-427. McDonnell, L.M., and Weatherford, M.S. (2012). Evidence Use and Stages of the Common Core State Standards Movement. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, April 16. McGann, J.G. (2010). The Global "Go-To Think Tanks," 2009 (The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program). Available: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/irp/documents/2009Global GoToReportThinkTankIndex1.31.10_2010.02.14.pdf [February 2011]. Meadows, D.H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Hartland, VT: Sustainability Institute. Menendian, S., and Watt, C. (2008). Systems Primer: Systems Thinking and Race. The Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University. Midgley, G. (2007). Systems thinking in evaluation. In B. Williams and I. Inman (Eds.), Sys- tems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Point Reyes Station, CA: Edge Press. Midgley, G., and Richardson, K.A. (2007). Systems thinking for community involvement in policy analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 9(1-2), 167-183. Miller, J.H., and Page, S.E. (2007). Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computa- tional Models of Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. New York: Oxford University Press. Mitton, C., Adair, C.E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S.B., and Perry, B.W. (2007) Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 85(4), 729-768. Morçöl, G., and Ivanova, N.P. (2010). Methods taught in public policy programs: Are quantitative methods still prevalent? Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 255-277. Mosteller, F., and Boruch, R.F. (2002). Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Education Research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Mosteller, F., and Moynihan, D.P. (Eds.). (1972). On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House. Moynihan, D.P., and Landuyt, N. (2009). How do public organizations learn? Bridging structural and cultural perspectives. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1,097-1,105. National Academy of Education. (1999). Recommendations Regarding Research Priorities: An Advisory Report to the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. Wash- ington, DC: National Academy of Education. Available: http://www.naeducation.org/ Research_Priorities_Publication.pdf [July 2012]. National Institutes of Health. (2012a). Budget Request, Office of Budget. Available: http:// officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/br.html# [July 2012]. National Institutes of Health. (2012b). Modeling Social Behavior. Funding Opportunity An- nouncement RFA-GM-13-006. Available: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/ RFA-GM-13-006.html [July 2012]. National Research Council. (1978). Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection, L. Lynn, Jr. (Ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council. (1999a). Improving Student Learning: A Strategic Plan for Educa- tion Research and Its Utilization. Committee on a Feasibility Study for a Strategic Educa- tion Research Program, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
OCR for page 85
REFERENCES 85 National Research Council. (1999b). Sowing Seeds of Change: Informing Public Policy in the Economic Research Service of USDA. Panel to Study the Research Program of the Eco- nomic Research Service, J.F. Geweke, J.T. Bonnen, A.A. White, and J.J. Koshel, Eds. Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and De- cision Making. Panel on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making, T. Dietz and P.C. Stern, Eds. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2009). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency, Fourth Edition. Committee on National Statistics. C.F. Citro, M.E. Martin, and M.L. Straf, Eds. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2011a). Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Committee on Behavioral and Social Science Research to Improve Intelligence Analysis for National Security, Board on Behavioral, Cogni- tive, and Sensory Sciences. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2011b). Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Behavioral and Social Scientific Foundations. Committee on Behavioral and Social Science Research to Improve Intelligence Analysis for National Security, B. Fischhoff and C. Chauvin, Eds. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Science Foundation. (2012a). Federal Funds for Research and Development: Fiscal Years 2009-11. [NSF 12-318]. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Available: http://nsf.gov/statistics/nsf12318/pdf/tab19.pdf [July 2012]. National Science Foundation. (2012b). FY 2013 Budget Request to Congress. Social, Behav- ioral, and Economic Sciences. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2013/ toc.jsp [July 2012]. National Science Foundation. (2012c). Integrative Graduate Education and Research Trainee- ship Program (IGERT). Available: http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_ id=12759 [July 2012]. Neilson, S. (2001). IDRC-Supported Research and its Influence on Public Policy--Knowledge Utilization and Public Policy Processes: A Literature Review. Ottawa, Canada: Inter- national Development Research Centre. Available: http://www.idrc.ca/uploads/ user-S/11303580541IDRC_supported_research_and_influence_on_public_policy. pdf [July 2012]. Neustadt, R.E., and Fineberg, H.V. (1978). The Swine Flu Affair: Decision Making on a Slip- pery Disease. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. North American Primary Care Research Group. (2009). Learning About Complexity Science. Available: http://www.napcrg.org/Beginner%20Complexity%20Science%20Module. pdf [August 2012]. Nutley, S., and Webb, J. (2000). Evidence and the policy process. In H.T.O. Davies, S.M. Nutley, and P.C. Smith (Eds.), What Works?: Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services (pp. 13-41). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
OCR for page 86
86 USING SCIENCE AS EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC POLICY Nutley, S., Walter, I., and Bland, N. (2002). The institutional arrangements for connecting evidence and policy: The case of drug misuse. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 76-94. Nutley, S., Walter, I. and Davies, H.T.O. (2007). Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press. O'Connor, A. (2007). Social Science for What? New York: Russell Sage Foundation. OECD. (2009). Applications of Complexity Science for Public Policy: New Tools for Finding Unanticipated Consequences and Unrealized Opportunities. Paris: OECD. Oh, C.H. (1997). Issues for the new thinking of knowledge utilization: Introductory remarks. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 10(3), 3-10. Olsen, J.P., and Peters, B.G. (Eds.). (1996). Lessons from Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press. Orszag, P. (2008). Behavioral Economics: Lessons from Retirement Research for Health Care and Beyond. Presentation to the Retirement Research Consortium. Available: http://www. cbo.gov/ftpdocs/96xx/doc9673/Presentation_RRC.1.1.shtml [February 2012]. Page, S.E. (2011). Complexity in Social Political and Economic Systems. SBE 2020 7 white paper, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/submission_detail.cfm?upld_ id=97 [August 2012]. Pelz, D.C., and Andrews, F.M. (1976). Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development. New York: Wiley. Pierson, F. (1959). A Study of University-College Programs in Business Administration. Carnegie Corporation of New York. New York: McGraw-Hill. Radin, B. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: George- town University Press. Rein, M., and White, S.H. (1977). Policy research: belief and doubt. Policy Analysis, 3(2), 239-271. Renn, O. (1995). Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22(3), 147-156. Rich, R.F. (1997). Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 10(3), 11-24 Riecken, H.W., and Boruch, R.F. (Eds.). (1975). Social Experimentation. New York: Academic Press. Rodgers, D.T. (2011). Age of Fracture. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rogers, P.J., and Williams, B. (2006). Evaluation for practice improvement and organiza- tional learning. In I.F. Shaw, J.C. Greene, and M.M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of Evalu- ation (pp. 76-97). London, UK: Sage. Rosenblatt, A., and Tseng, V. (2010) The demand side: Uses of research in child and ado- lescent mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37, 201-204. Ruttan, V.W. (1984). Social science knowledge and institutional change, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(55), 549-559. Sabatier, P.A. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
OCR for page 87
REFERENCES 87 Sabatier, P.A., and Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Ad- vocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Allen and Unwin. Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday. Shulha, L.M. and Cousins, J.B. (1997), Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 18(3). Sibley, E. (1974). Social Science Research Council: The First Fifty Years. New York: Social Science Research Council. Sills, D.L. (1986). A note on the origin of interdisciplinary. Items, 40(1), 17-18. Silver, H.J., Sharpe, A.L., Kelly, H., Kobor, P., and Sroufe, G.E. (2012). Social and behavioral science research in the FY 2013 budget. AAAS REPORT XXXVII: Research and Devel- opment FY 2013 (Ch. 19, pp. 205-213). Report of the Intersociety Working Group. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/rdreport2013/13pch19.pdf [July 2012]. Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley. Sims, C.A. (2010). But economics is not an experimental science. Journal of Economic Per- spectives, 24(2), 59-68. Available: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/ jep.24.2.59 [July 2012]. Slavin, R.E. (2006). Translating research into widespread practice: The case of success for all. In M. Constas and R. Sternberg (Eds.), Translating Theory and Research into Educational Practice (pp. 113-126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Smith, M.S., and Smith, M.L. (2009) Research in the policy process. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, and D.N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of Education Policy Research. New York: Routledge. Social Science Research Council. (2012). Measure of America. Available: http://www.mea- sureofamerica.org/project/ [October 2012]. Spencer Foundation. (2012). Strategic Initiatives: Data Use and Educational Improvement. Available: http://www.spencer.org/content.cfm/data-use-and-educational-improvement [July 2012]. Spillane, J.P., and Miele, D.B. (2007). Evidence in practice: A framing of the terrain. In P.A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and Decision Making, 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part I, pp. 46-73). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Spillane, J.P., Reiser, B.J., and Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation, Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431. State of the USA. (2012). The State of the USA. Available: http://www.stateoftheusa.org/ [October 2012]. Steinbruner, J. (1974). The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Sterman, J.D. (2006). Learning from evidence in a complex world. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 505-514. Stinchcombe, A. (1987). The Logic of Scientific Inferences. Constructing Social Theories. Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press. Stokes, D.E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washing- ton, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
OCR for page 88
88 USING SCIENCE AS EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC POLICY Stone, D. (2001). The Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making (revised edition). New York: W.W. Norton. Stone, D., with Maxwell, S., and Keating, M. (2001). Bridging Research and Policy, An International Workshop. Funded by the UK Department for International Develop- ment, Warwick University. Warwick, UK: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation. Sudsawad, P. (2007). Knowledge Translation: Introduction to Models, Strategies, and Measures. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research. Available: http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/ ktintro/ [July 2012]. Sutherland, W.J., Bellingan, L., Bellingham, J.R., Blackstock, J.J., Bloomfield, R.M., Bravo, M., Cadman, V.M., Cleevely, D.D., Clements, A., Cohen, A.S., Cope, D.R., Daemmrich, A.A, Devecchi, C., Anadon, L.D., Denegri1, S., Doubleday, R., Dusic, N.R., Evans, R.J., Feng, W.Y., Godfray, H.C.J., Harris, P., Hartley, S.E., Hester, A.J., Holmes, J., Hughes, A., Hulme, M., Irwin, C., Jennings, R.C., Kass, G.S., Littlejohns, P., Marteau, T.M., McKee, G., Millstone, E.P., Nuttall, W.J., Owens, S., Parker, M.M., Pearson, S., Petts, J., Ploszek, R., Pullin, A.S., Reid, G., Richards, K.S., Robinson, J.G., Shaxson, L., Sierra, L., Smith, B.G., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Stilgoe, J., Stirling, A., Tyler, C.P., Winickoff, D.E., and Zimmern, R.L. (2012). A collaboratively-derived science- policy research agenda. PLoS ONE, 7(3): e31824. Available: http://www.plosone.org/ article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031824 [July 2012]. Szanton, P. (2001). Not Well Advised: The City as Client--An Illuminating Analysis of Urban Governments and Their Consultants. San Jose, CA: Authors Choice Press. (Orig. pub. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1981). Thaler, R.H. (2012). Watching behavior before writing the rules. The New York Times, Sunday Money, July 8. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/08/business/behavioral- science-can-help-guide-policy-economic-view.html?pagewanted=all [ October 2012]. Thaler, R.H., and Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven CT: Yale University Press. Thouless, R. (1990). Straight and Crooked Thinking (revised edition). London, UK: Hodder Arnold H&S. Toulmin, S. (1969). The Uses of Argument (updated edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Toulmin, S. (1979). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan. Tseng, V. (2012). The uses of research in policy and practice, Social Policy Report, 26(2), 3-16. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1,124-1,131. United Nations. (2012). Human Development Index. Available: http://hdr.undp.org/en/ statistics/hdi/ [July 2012]. U.S. Department of Education. (2012). The Regional Educational Laboratory Program (REL) About Us. Available: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/about/ [July 2012]. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2011). Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
OCR for page 89
REFERENCES 89 Van Langenhove, L. (2004). From opening to rethinking the social sciences. In Re-inventing the Social Sciences, Report of a workshop, Lisbon, November 8-9, 2001. OECD Direc- torate for Science, Technology, and Industry. Paris: OECD. Available: http://www.oecd. org/science/scienceandtechnologypolicy/33695704.pdf [October 2012]. Vince, R., and Broussine, M. (2000). Rethinking organisational learning in local government. Local Government Studies, 26(1), 15-30. Watts, D.J. (2003). Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness (Princeton Studies in Complexity). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Webber, D.J. (1991). The distribution and use of policy knowledge in the policy process. Knowledge and Policy, 4(4), 6-35. Weiss, C.H. (Ed.). (1977). Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Weiss, C.H. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In L.E. Lynn (Ed.), Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Weiss, C.H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Re- view, 39(5), 426-431. Weiss, C.H. (1991). Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 4(1-2), 37-55. Weiss, C.H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 137-150. Weiss, C.H., and Bucuvalas, M.J. (1980). Social Science Research and Decision Making. New York: Columbia University Press. Weiss, C.H, Murphy-Graham, E., and Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: Evidence from a study of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) Program. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 12-31. William T. Grant Foundation. (2012). Request for Proposals (RFP) on Understanding the Acquisition, Interpretation, and Use of Research Evidence in Policy and Practice. Avail- able: http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/funding_opportunities/research_grants/ rfp_for_the_use_of_research_evidence [August 2012]. Williams, B., and Hummelbrunner, R. (2011). Systems Concepts in Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Wilson, J.Q. (1996). Foreword. In M. Gerson (Ed.), The Essential Neoconservative Reader. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Wilson, W. (1901). Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin and Company. Zegart, A.B. (2011). Implementing change: Organizational challenges. In National Research Council, Intelligence Analysis for Tomorrow: Behavioral and Social Scientific Foundations (pp. 309-329). B. Fischhoff and C. Chauvin (Eds.), Committee on Behavioral and So- cial Science Research to Improve Intelligence Analysis for National Security, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OCR for page 90