Click for next page ( 206

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 205
Appendix E Questions Related to the Statement of Task The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) asked the committee to consider in its review of evidence questions related to the two primary dimensions of its task. These included individual and household factors such as knowledge about diet and food preparation; food preferences and cultural influences on food choices; and environmental factors such as variation in food prices by locale and geo- graphical access to food outlets. Evidence related to the sponsor’s questions is discussed in the report as noted below each question. Questions related to the feasibility of defining Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) adequacy include • What are collateral costs associated with food acquisition and preparation that need to be considered? — ollateral costs associated with food acquisition and preparation C such as time, knowledge and skills, availability of food prepara- tion and storage equipment, access to transportation, and access to food outlets are discussed in the section “Household and Individual Factors” in Chapter 4. • Are there economies of scale that adjust SNAP allotments for households of various sizes and incomes? What are they? — nformation about economies of scale can be found in Chapter 5 I under the section “Household Size and the Benefit Level” and in Box 5-1. 205

OCR for page 205
206 SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM • What special dietary considerations (cultural foods, vegetarian d ­ iets, etc.) need to be addressed? — hapter 4 discusses taste preferences, personal and social factors, C and acculturation in the section “Food Choice.” • How does variation in cost of food by location or local economy (regional vs. urban vs. suburban) need to be addressed? — he section “Geographic and Regional Variations in Food T Prices” in Chapter 4 describes variations in food prices across geographic regions of the United States. Tables 4-1, 4-2, and 4-3 display data on the variation in market prices among certain food groups and across market groups. Recommendation 1 in Chapter 6 addresses geographic price variability as a factor to consider in defining the adequacy of the SNAP allotment. • Do variation in economic fluctuation and price change over the course of a federal fiscal year need to be factored into a definition? If so, how? — ariations in food prices over time due to changes in the avail- V ability of supply of raw commodities, changes in farm level production costs, changes in food processing costs, and seasonal variation are described in the section “Variation in Food Prices Over Time Due to Inflationary Factors” in Chapter 4. Chapter 2 describes the lag time from the calculation of the Thrifty Food Plan cost and adjustments to the maximum SNAP benefit to ac- count for inflation. Recommendation 2 in Chapter 6 addresses economic fluctuation over the federal fiscal year as a factor to consider in defining the adequacy of the SNAP allotment. • What demographic, compositional, and other household variations need to be considered? — he section “Household and Individual Factors” in Chapter 4 T includes a discussion of household variations that need to be considered, such as family structure, acculturation, and employ- ment status. Recommendation 1 in Chapter 6 identifies specific household variations that should be considered in defining the adequacy of the SNAP allotment. Questions related to determining the data and analyses needed to sup- port an evidence-based assessment of SNAP adequacy were • Are the data available to establish an operational definition? Are there limitations? If data are not available, how can they be obtained? — iscussions of data needs and limitations are located in Chapter D 3 in the section “Data and Analytical Challenges to Assessing

OCR for page 205
APPENDIX E 207 SNAP Allotment Adequacy” and in Chapter 4 in the section “Data and Analytical Challenges.” • What kinds of analyses are necessary to create and validate an operational definition? — he section “Other Research Considerations” in Chapter 6 ad- T dresses the data and analyses needed to support an evidence- based assessment of adequacy. • What methodological strategy is needed to compare the adequacy of current and alternative SNAP benefit definitions? — hapter 5 addresses the methodological strategy to compare the C adequacy of current and alternative SNAP benefit definitions, particularly the sections under “Evidence on the Components of the SNAP Benefit Formula.” Recommendation 2 in Chapter 6 addresses specific program factors to consider as components of a definition of SNAP allotment adequacy.

OCR for page 205