National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A: Agenda
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Appendix B

Bibliography

Acs, Zoltan, and David Audretsch. 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Aerts, Kris, and Dirk Czarnitzki. 2005. “Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Flanders.” Catholic University of Leuven, Department of Applied Economics and Steunpunt O&O Statistieken.

Aerts, Kris, and Dirk Czarnitski. 2006. “The Impact of Public R&D Funding in Flanders.” IWT Studies 54.

Aghion, Phillipe, Robin Burgess, Stephen Redding, and Fabrizio Zilibotti. 2003. “The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Theory and Evidence from India.” Washington, DC: Center for Economic Policy Research. Agrawal, A. and R. Henderson. 2002. “Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT.” Management Science 48(1):44-60.

Ahluwalia, Montek Singh. 2001. “State Level Reforms Under Economic Reforms in India.” Stanford University Working Paper No. 96. March.

Aizcorbe, A., S. Oliner, and D. Sichel. 2006. “Shifting Trends in Semiconductor Prices and the Pace of Technological Progress.” Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series Working Paper No. 2006-44. September.

Alic, John A., Lewis M. Branscomb, Harvey Brooks, Ashton B. Carter, and Gerald L. Epstein. 1992. Beyond Spin-off: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Allen, John. 2011. “House continuing resolution would bar NASA from China ties.” Politico February 12.

Allen, Stuart D., Albert N. Link, and Dan T. Rosenbaum. 2007.

“Entrepreneurship and Human Capital: Evidence of Patenting Activity from the Academic Sector.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(6):937-951.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Allison, J., and M. Lemley. 1998. “Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents.” AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26:185-277.

Altenburg, Tilman, Hubert Schmitz, and Andreas Stamm. 2008. “Breakthrough: China’s and India’s Transition from Production to Innovation.” World Development 36(2):325-344.

Amsden, Alice H. 2001. The Rise of “the Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-industrializing Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Amsden, Alice H. and Wan-wen Chu. 2003. Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Amsden, Alice H., Ted Tschang, and Akira Goto. 2001. “Do Foreign Companies Conduct R&D in Developing Countries?” Tokyo, Japan: ADB Institute.

Aoki, Reiko, and Sadao Nagaoka. 2004. “The Consortium Standard and Patent Pools.” The Economic Review (Keizai Kenkyu) 55(4):345-356.

Aoki, Reiko, and Sadao Nagaoka. 2005. “Coalition Formation for a Consortium Standard through a Standard Body and a Patent Pool: Theory and Evidence from MPEG2, DVD and 3G.” IIR Working Paper WP#05-01. February.

Applied Research Institute, Inc. 2006. Survey of the Environment for Startups. Applied Research Institute. November.

Archibugi, Danielle, Jeremy Howells, and Jonathan Michie, eds. 1999. Innovation Policy and the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Argyres, N. S., and J. P. Liebeskind. 1998. “Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35:427-454.

Arora, A., and R. P. Merges. 2004. “Specialized Supply Firms, Property Rights, and Firm Boundaries.” Industrial and Corporate Change 13(3):451-476.

Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. 2003. “Markets for Technology and Corporate Strategy.” In O. Granstrand, ed., Economics, Law, and Intellectual Property, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli, and W. Cohen. 2001. “R&D and the Patent Premium.” Carnegie-Mellon University and INSEAD: paper presented at the ASSA Annual Meetings. January 2002. Atlanta, Georgia.

Arrow, K. J. 2000. “Increasing Returns: Historiographic Issues and Path Dependence.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7(2):171-180.

Arrow, Kenneth. 1962. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Arthur, W. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Small Events.” Economic Journal 99(2):116-131.

Asheim, Bjorn T., et al., eds. 2003. Regional Innovation Policy for Small-medium Enterprises. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Association of University Research Parks. 1998. “Worldwide Research & Science Park Directory 1998.” New York: BPI Communications.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Association of University Research Parks. 2008 “The Power of Place: A National Strategy for Building America’s Communities of Innovation.” Tucson, AZ: Association of University Research Parks.

Athreye, Suma S. 2000. “Technology Policy and Innovation: The Role of Competition Between Firms.” In Pedro Conceicao et al., eds. Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy: Opportunities and Challenges for the Knowledge Economy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

Atkinson, Robert. 2004. The Past and Future of America’s Economy-Long Waves of Innovation that Power Cycles of Growth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Atkinson, Robert. 2006. “Is the Next Economy Taking Shape?” Issues in Science and Technology Winter.

Audretsch, D. B., ed. 1998. Industrial Policy and Competitive Advantage. Volumes 1 and 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Audretsch, D. B. 1998. “Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14(2):18-29.

Audretsch, D. B. 2006. The Entrepreneurial Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review 86(3):630-640.

Audretsch, D. B., and M. P. Feldman. 1999. “Innovation in Cities: Science-based Diversity, Specialization, and Localized Competition.” European Economic Review 43(2):409-429.

Audretsch, D. B., B. Bozeman, K. L. Combs, M. P. Feldman, A. N. Link, D. S. Siegel, P. Stephan, G. Tassey, and C. Wessner. 2002. “The Economics of Science and Technology.” Journal of Technology Transfer 27:155-203.

Audretsch, D. B., H. Grimm, and C. W. Wessner. 2005. Local Heroes in the Global Village: Globalization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies. New York: Springer.

Auerswald, Philip E., Lewis M. Branscomb, Nicholas Demos, and Brian K. Min. 2005. Understanding Private-Sector Decision Making for Early-Stage Technology Development: A “Between Invention and Innovation Project” Report. NIST GCR 02-841A. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Augustine, Norman. 2007. Is America Falling Off the Flat Earth? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Baker, Stephen. 2005. “New York’s Big Hopes for Nano.” BusinessWeek February 4.

Bakouros, Y. L., D. C. Mardas, and N. C. Varsakelis. 2002. “Science Parks, a High-Tech Fantasy? An Analysis of the Science Parks of Greece.” Technovation 22(2):123-128.

Baldwin, J. R., P. Hanl, and D. Sabourin. 2000. “Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights.” Statistics Canada Working Paper No. 122. March.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Baldwin, John Russel, and Peter Hanel. 2003. Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy: Canadian Industry and International Implications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Balzat, Markus, and Andreas Pyka. 2006. “Mapping National Innovation Systems in the OECD Area.” International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 2(1-2):158-176.

Baptista, R. 1998. “Clusters, Innovation, and Growth: A Survey of the Literature.” In G. M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds. The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Bartzokas, Anthony, and Morris Teubal. 2002. “The Political Economy of Innovation Policy Implementation in Developing Countries.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 11(4-5).

Battelle. 2009. R&D Magazine December.

Beinhocker, Eric D. 2007. Origin of Wealth—Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

Bennis, Warren, and Patricia Ward Biederman. 1997. Organizing Genius. New York: Basic Books.

Berlin, Leslie. The Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley. 2005. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bessen, J., and M. J. Meurer. 2005. “The Patent Litigation Explosion.” Research on Innovation and Boston University School of Law. Manuscript. August.

Bhidé, Amar. 2006. “Venturesome Consumption, Innovation and Globalization.” Paper presented at the Centre on Capitalism & Society and CESifo Venice Summer Institute 2006. “Perspectives on the Performance of the Continent’s Economies.” July 21-22, 2006. Held at Venice International University. San Servolo, Italy.

Biegelbauer, Peter S., and Susana Borras, eds. 2003. Innovation Policies in Europe and the U.S.: The New Agenda. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Birch, David. 1981. “Who Creates Jobs?” The Public Interest 65:3-14.

Blanpied, William A. 1998. “Inventing U.S. Science Policy.” Physics Today 51(2):34-40.

Block, Fred, and Matthew Keller. 2008. “Where Do Innovations Come From? Transformations in the U.S. National Innovation System, 1970-2006.” The Information Technology and Innovation Forum. July.

Blomström, Magnus, Ari Kokko, and Fredrik Sjöholm. 2002. “Growth & Innovation Policies for a Knowledge Economy: Experiences from Finland, Sweden, & Singapore.” EIJS Working Paper, Series No. 156.

Bloomberg News. 2012. “Germany Will Publish Progress Report on Nuclear Exit in December.” July 24.

Bonvillian, William B. 2006. “Power Play, The DARPA Model and U.S. Energy Policy.” The American Interest II(2):39-48.

Borger, Klaus, et al. 2005. Mittelstand Monitor, 2005: Annual report on cyclical and structural issues relating to small and medium-sized enterprises, Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. 2005.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Borras, Susana. 2003. The Innovation Policy of the European Union: From Government to Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Borrus, Michael, and Jay Stowsky. 2000. “Technology Policy and Economic Growth.” In Charles Edquist and Maureen McKelvey, eds. Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment. Volume 2. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Bradsher, Pete. 2009. “China-U.S. Trade Dispute Has Broad Implications.” New York Times September 14.

Branscomb, L. M., and P. E. Auerswald. 2001. Taking Technical Risks: How Innovators, Executives, and Investors Manage High-Tech Risks. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.

Branscomb, Lewis M., and Philip E. Auerswald. 2002. Between Invention and Innovation: An Analysis of Funding for Early-Stage Technology Development. NIST GCR 02-841. Gathersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. November.

Braudel, Fernand. 1973. Capitalism and Material Life 1400-1800. London, UK: Harper Colophon Books.

Breschi, S. and F. Lissoin. 2001. “Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey.” Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4):975-1005.

Breznitz, D. and Murphree. 2011. Run of the Red Queen; Government, Innovation, and Globalization and Economic Growth in China. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Breznitz, Dan. 2007. Innovation in the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Broder, J. and J. Ansfield. 2009. “China and U.S. Seek a Truce on Greenhouse Gases.” The New York Times June 7.

Browning, L., and J. Shetler. 2000. SEMATECH: Saving the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.

Bush, Nathan. 2005. “Chinese Competition Policy, It Takes More than a Law.” China Business Review. May-June.

Bush, Vannevar. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Caliendo, Marco, and Alexander Kritikos. 2012. “Searching for the entrepreneurial personality: New evidence and avenues for further research.” Journal of Economic Psychology 33(2):319-324.

Caliendo, Marco, Frank Fossen, and Alexander Kritikos. 2008. “The Impact of Risk Attitudes on Entrepreneurial Survival.” GfA Discussion Paper No. 12/2008.

Capron, Henri, and Michele Cincera. 2006. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Flemish Innovation System: An External Viewpoint. Brussels, Belgium: IWT.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Caracostas, Paraskevas, and Ugur Muldur. 2001. “The Emergence of the New European Union Research and Innovation Policy.” In P. Laredo and P. Mustar, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Cardoso, Ana Rute, Paulo Guimaraes, and Klaus Zimmermann. 2010. “Trends in Economic Research: An International Perspective.” Kyklos 63(4):479-494.

Castells, M., and P. Hall. 1994. Technopoles of the World. London, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cebrowski, Arthur, and John Garska. 1998. “Network Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future.” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. January.

Center for Economic Development and Business Research. 2008. “Kansas Aviation Manufacturing,” Wichita State University: W. Frank Barton School of Business. September

Chambers, John, ed. 1999. The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Chan, K. F., and Theresa Lau. 2005. “Assessing Technology Incubator Programs in the Science Park: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.” Technovation 25(10):1215-1228.

Chand, Satish, and Kunal Sen. 2002. “Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing.” Review of Development Economics 6(February).

Chang, Connie, Stephanie Shipp, and Andrew Wang. 2002. “The Advanced Technology Program: A Public-Private Partnership for Early-stage Technology Development.” Venture Capital 4(4): 363-370.

Chao, Loretta. 2011. “China Plans to Ease Rules That Irked Companies.” The Wall Street Journal July 1.

Chesbrough, Henry. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. April.

China Daily. 2008. “China Luring ‘Sea Turtles’ Home.” December 18.

China Trade Extra. 2005. China Agrees to Delay Software Procurement Rule While Talking with U.S. July 11.

Chinese Ministry of Finance. 2006. Opinions of the Ministry of Finance on Implementing Government Procurement Policies That Encourage Indigenous Innovation. Cai Ku [2006] No. 47. June 13.

Chordà, I. M. 1996. “Towards the Maturity State: An Insight into the Performance of French Technopoles.” Technovation 16(3):143-152.

Chu Ng, Ying and Sung-ko Li, 2009. “Efficiency and productivity growth in Chinese universities during the post-reform period.” China Economic Review. Volume 20

Chuma, Hiroyuki. 2006. “Increasing Complexity and Limits of Organization in the Microlithography Industry: Implications for Science-based Industries.” Research Policy 35:394-411.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Chuma, Hiroyuki, and Norikazu Hashimoto. 2007. “Moore’s Law, Increasing Complexity and Limits of Organization: Modern Significance of Japanese DRAM ERA.” NISTEP Discussion Paper No. 44. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy.

Cimoli, Mario, and Marina della Giusta. 2000. “The Nature of Technological Change and its Main Implications on National and Local Systems of Innovation.” IIASA Interim Report IR-98-029.

Cincera, Michele. 2006. Comparison of Regional Approaches to Foster Innovation in the European Union: The Case of Flanders. Brussels, Belgium: IWT.

Cincera, Michele. 2006. R&D Activities of Flemish Companies in the Private Sector: An Analysis for the Period 1998-2002. Brussels, Belgium: IWT. Clark, B. 1995. Places of Inquiry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Clarke, P. 2004. “LETI, Crolles Alliance Open $350-million 32-nm Research Fab.” EE Times April 24.

Clarke, P., M. LaPedus, and M. Santarini. 2005. “IBM-led Consortium to Build Fab in N.Y.” EE Times January 5.

Clough, G. Wayne. 2007. “The Role of the Research University in Fostering Innovation.” The Americas Competitiveness Forum. June 12.

Coakes, Elayne, and Peter Smith. 2007. “Developing Communities of Innovation by Identifying Innovation Champions.” The Learning Organization: An International Journal 14(1):74-85.

Coburn, Christopher, and Dan Berglund. 1995. Partnerships: A Compendium of State and Federal Cooperative Programs. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.

Cohen, W. 2002. “Thoughts and Questions on Science Parks.” Presented at the National Science Foundation Science Parks Indicators Workshop. University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Cohen, W., R. Florida, and R. Goe. 1992. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University.

Cohen, W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. 2000. “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not).” NBER Working Paper 7552. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Cohen, W. M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R. R. Nelson, and J. P. Walsh. 2002. “R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States.” Research Policy 1425:1-19.

Cole, Jonathan R. 2010. “The Great American University: Its Rise to Preeminence, Its Indispensible National Role, Why It Must Be Protected.” Public Affairs.

Combs, Kathryn L., and Albert N. Link. 2003. “Innovation Policy in Search of an Economic Paradigm: The Case of Research Partnerships in the United States.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15(2).

Conant, Jennet. 2002. Tuxedo Park. New York: Simon & Shuster. Conant, Jennet. 2005. 109 East Palace. New York: Simon & Shuster.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Cooper, Helene and M. Lander. 2011. “U.S. Shifts Focus to Press China for Market Access.” New York Times. January 18

Constant, Amelie F., Bienvenue N. Tien, Klaus F. Zimmermann, and Jingzhou Meng. 2011. “China’s Latent Human Capital Investment: Achieving Milestones and Competing for the Top.” IZA Discussion Paper 5650.

Council on Competitiveness. 2005. Innovate America: Thriving in a World of Challenge and Change. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.

Council on Government Relations. 2000. Technology Transfer in U.S. Research Universities: Dispelling Common Myths. Washington, DC: Council on Government Relations.

Crain, Mark. 2005. “The Impact of Regulatory Costs on Small Firms.” SBA: SBHQ-03-M-0522. Washington, DC: Small Business Administration.

Crafts, N. F. R. 1995. “The Golden Age of Economic Growth in Western Europe, 1950-1973.” Economic History Review 3:429-447.

Czarnitzki, Dirk, and Niall O’Byrnes. 2007. “Innovation and the Impact on Productivity in Flanders.” Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management 52(2).

Dahlman, Carl. 2005. India and the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

Dahlman, Carl. 2011. The World Under Pressure: How China and India Are Influencing the Global Economy and Environment. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Dahlman, Carl, and Anuja Utz. 2005. India and the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Dahlman, Carl J., and Jean Eric Aubert. 2001. China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Daneke, Gregory A. 1998. “Beyond Schumpeter: Non-linear Economics and the Evolution of the U.S. Innovation System.” Journal of Socio-economics 27(1):97-117.

Darby, Michael, Lynne G. Zucker, and Andrew J. Wang. 2002. Program Design and Firm Success in the Advanced Technology Program: Project Structure and Innovation Outcomes. NISTIR 6943. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Das, Gurcharan. 2006. “The India Model.” Foreign Affairs 85(4).

Dasgupta, P., and P. David. 1994. “Toward a New Economics of Science.” Research Policy 23:487-521.

David, P. A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75(2):332-337.

Davidsson, Per. 1996. “Methodological Concerns in the Estimation of Job Creation in Different Firm Size Classes.” Working Paper, Jönköping International Business School.

Davis, Steven, John Haltiwanger, and Scott Schuh. 1993. “Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing the Facts.” Working Paper No. 4492. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

de Jonquieres, Guy. 2004. “China and India Cannot Fill the World’s Skills Gap.” Financial Times July 12.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

de Jonquieres, Guy. 2004. “To Innovate, China Needs More than Standards.” Financial Times July 12.

de Jonquieres, Guy. 2006. “China’s Curious Marriage of Convenience.” Financial Times July 19.

De la Mothe, J., and Gilles Paquet. 1998. “National Innovation Systems, ‘Real Economies’ and Instituted Processes.” Small Business Economics 11:101-111.

De Proft, A. 2006. Presentation at National Academies symposium on “Synergies in Regional and National Policies in the Global Economy.” Leuven, Belgium. September.

Debackere, Koenraad, and Reinhilde Veugelers. 2005. “The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links.” Research Policy 34(3):321-342.

Debackere, Koenraad, and Wolfgang Glänzel. 2004. “Using a Bibliometric Approach to Support Research Policy Making: The Case of the Flemish BOF-key.” Scientometrics 59(2).

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 2003. DARPA Over The Years. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. October 27.

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 2005. DARPA—Bridging the Gap, Powered by Ideas. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. February.

Deng, Xiaoping, General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee. 1978. Address at the First National Science Congress.

Department of Energy. 2011. U.S.-China Clean Energy Cooperation: A Progress Report by the U.S. Department of Energy. January.

Dirks, S and M. Keeling. 2009. Executive Report. “A Vision of Smarter Cities: How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future,” IBM Global Business Services,

Doloreux, David. 2004. “Regional Innovation Systems in Canada: A Comparative Study.” Regional Studies 38(5):479-492.

Dries, Ilse, Peer van Humbeek, and Jan Larosse. 2005. Linking Innovation Policy and Sustainable Development in Flanders. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Eaton, Jonathan, Eva Gutierrez, and Samuel Kortum. 1998. “European Technology Policy.” NBER Working Papers 6827.

Edler, J., and S. Kuhlmann. 2005. “Towards One System? The European Research Area Initiative, the Integration of Research Systems and the Changing Leeway of National Policies.” Technikfolgenabschätzung: Theorie und Praxis 1(4):59-68.

EE Times. 2006. “Chinese Province Pays to Get 300-mm Wafer Fab.” June 28.

Ehlen, Mark A. 1999. Economic Impacts of Flow-Control Machining Technologies: Early Applications in the Automobile Industry. NISTIR 6373. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Ehlers, Vernon J. 1998. Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy, A Report to Congress by the House Committee on Science. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Ehrenberg, R. 2000. Tuition Rising. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Eickelpasch, Alexander, and Michael Fritsch. 2005. “Contests for Cooperation: A New Approach in German Innovation Policy.“ Research Policy 34:1269-1282.

Electronic News. 2006. “SMIC Gets $3B Nod from Chain’s Wuhan Government.” May 22.

Endquist, Charles, ed. 1997. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions, and Organizations. London, UK: Pinter.

Energy Information Administration. 2009. “State Energy Consumption Estimates: 1960 through 2007.” Tables 8-12.

Engardio, Pete. 2009. “Can the Future be Built in America? Inside the U.S. Manufacturing Crisis.” BusinessWeek September 21.

Engel, Kristen. 2005. “Mitigating Global Climate Change in the United States: A Regional Approach.” NYU Environmental Law Journal 14:54.

EOS Gallup Europe. 2004. “Entrepreneurship.” Flash Eurobarometer 146. January.

European Commission. 2003. Innovation in Candidate Countries: Strengthening Industrial Performance. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, May.

European Commission. 2003. “Investing in Research: An Action Plan for Europe 2003.” Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Evans, D., and Jovanovic, B. 1989. “An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice under Liquidity Constraints.” Journal of Political Economy 97:808-827.

Evans, Sir Harold. 2005. They Made America. Sloan Foundation Project. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Faems, Dries, Bart Van Looy, and Koenraad Debackere. 2005. “Inter-organizational Collaboration and Innovation: Toward a Portfolio Approach.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3):238-250.

Fan, W., and White, M. J. 2002. “Personal Bankruptcy and the Level of Entrepreneurial Activity.” NBER Working Paper, Series 9340. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Fangerberg, Jan. 2002. Technology, Growth, and Competitiveness: Selected Essays. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Federal Communications Commission. 2009. Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.

Federal Register Notice. 2004. “2004 WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding China: Value Added Tax on Integrated Circuits.” April 21.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Federal Trade Commission. 2003. To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Patent and Competition Law Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. October.

Feigenbaum, Evan. 2003. China’s Techno-Warriors: National Security and Strategic Competition from the Nuclear to the Information Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Feldman, Maryann, and Albert N. Link. 2001. “Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-based Economy.” Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation. Volume 23. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.

Feldman, Maryann, Irwin Feller, Janet Bercovitz, and Richard Burton. 2002. “Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities.” Management Science 48(1):105-121.

Feller, Irwin. 1997. “Technology Transfer from Universities.” In John Smart, ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Volume XII. New York: Agathon Press.

Feller, Irwin. 2004. A Comparative Analysis of the Processes and Organizational Strategies Engaged in by Research Universities Participating in Industry-University Research Relationships. Final report submitted to the University of California Industry-University Cooperative Research Program. Agreement No. M-447646-19927-3.

Ferguson, R. and C. Olofsson. 2004. “Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs: Location, Survival and Growth.” Journal of Technology Transfer 29(1):5-17.

Field, A. J. 2003. “The Most Technologically Progressive Decade of the Century.” American Economic Review (September):1406.

Flamm, K. 1996. Mismanaged Trade: Strategic Policy and the Semiconductor Industry. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Flamm, K. 2003. “Microelectronics Innovation: Understanding Moore’s Law and Semiconductor Price Trends.” International Journal of Technology, Policy, and Management 3(2).

Flamm, K. 2003. “The New Economy in Historical Perspective: Evolution of Digital Technology.” In New Economy Handbook. St. Louis, MO: Academic Press.

Foerst, Ann. 2005. God in the Machine. New York: Penguin Books.

Fonfria, Antonio, Carlos Diaz de la Guardia, and Isabel Alvarez. 2002. “The Role of Technology and Competitiveness Policies: A Technology Gap Approach.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 13(1-2-3):223-241.

Fong, Glenn R. 1998. “Follower at the Frontier: International Competition and Japanese Industrial Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 42(2).

Fong, Glenn R. 2001. “ARPA Does Windows: The Defense Underpinning of the PC Revolution.” Business and Politics 3(3).

Foray, Dominique, and Patrick Llerena. 1996. “Information Structure and Coordination in Technology Policy: A Theoretical Model and Two Case Studies.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 6(2).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Friedman, Thomas. 2005. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Fukugawa, N. 2006. “Science Parks in Japan and Their Value-Added Contributions to New Technology-based Firms.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 24(2):381-400.

Furman, Jeffrey L., Michael E. Porter, and Scott Stern. 2002. “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.” Research Policy 31:899-933.

Gallaher, M. P., A. N. Link, and J. E. Petrusa. 2006. Innovation in the U.S. Service Sector. London, UK: Routledge.

Geiger, R. 1986. To Advance Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

Geiger, R. 1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

George, Gerard, and Ganesh N. Prabhu. 2003. “Developmental Financial Institutions as Technology Policy Instruments: Implications for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies.” Research Policy 32(1):89-108.

Gibb, M. J. 1985. Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

Goldstein, H. A., and M. I. Luger. 1990. “Science/Technology Parks and

Regional Development Theory.” Economic Development Quarterly 4(1):64-78.

Goldstein, H. A., and M. I. Luger. 1992. “University-based Research Parks as a Rural Development Strategy.” Policy Studies Journal 20(2):249-263.

Goodwin, James C., et al. 1999. Technology Transition. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Government of the People’s Republic of China. 2004. Anticompetitive Practices of Multinational Companies and Countermeasures. Administration of Industry and Commerce, Office of Antimonopoly, Fair Trade Bureau, State Administration of Industry and Commerce. May.

Government of the People’s Republic of China. 2005. Article 10: Exemptions of Monopoly Agreements. Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China. Revised July 27.

Government of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Information Industry. 2006. “Outline of the 11th Five-Year Plan and Medium-and-Long-Term Plan for 2020 for Science and Technology Development in the Information Industry.” Xin Bu Ke, No. 309, August 29.

Government of the People’s Republic of China, National Development and Reform Commission. 2006. The 11th Five-Year Plan. March 19.

Grande, Edgar. 2001. “The Erosion of State Capacity and European Innovation Policy: A Comparison of German and EU Information Technology Policies.” Research Policy 30(6):905-921.

Grayson, L. 1993. Science Parks: An Experiment in High-Technology Transfer. London, UK: The British Library Board.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Griffing, Bruce. 2001. “Between Invention and Innovation, Mapping the Funding for Early-Stage Technologies.” Presentation at Carnegie Conference Center. Washington, DC. January 25.

Griliches, Z. 1993. “The Search for R&D Spillovers.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94(S): S29-S47.

Grindley, Peter, David Mowery, and Brian Silverman. 1994. “SEMATECH and Collaborative Research: Lessons in the Design of High Technology Consortia.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13(4):723-758.

Grove, A. 2001. Swimming Across. New York: Warner Books.

Gu, Shulin and Lundvall Bengt-Åke. 2006. “Policy learning as a key process in the transformation of the Chinese Innovation Systems.” In Asian Innovation Systems in Transition. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Guy, I. 1996. “A Look at Aston Science Park.” Technovation 16(5):217-218.

Guy, I. 1996. “New Ventures on an Ancient Campus.” Technovation 16(6):269-270.

Hackett, S. M., and D. M. Dilts. 2004. “A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research.” Journal of Technology Transfer 29(1):55-82.

Hall, B. H. 2002. “The Assessment: Technology Policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(1):1-9.

Hall, B. H. 2005. “Exploring the Patent Explosion.” Journal of Technology Transfer 30:35-48.

Hall, B. H., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2001. “Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Uni-versities: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2):87-98.

Hall, B. H., A. N. Link, and J. T. Scott. 2003. “Universities as Research Partners.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85(2):485-491.

Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” RAND Journal of Economics 36:16-38.

Hall, B. H., and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. 1979-1995.” RAND Journal of Economics 32:101-128.

Halpern, Mark. 2006. “The Trouble with the Turing Test.” The New Atlantis 11(Winter):42-63.

Hane, G. 1999. “Comparing University-Industry Linkages in the United States and Japan.” In L. Branscomb, F. Kodama, and R. Florida, eds. Industrializing Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hansson, F., K. Husted, and J. Vestergaard. 2005. “Second Generation Science Parks: From Structural Holes Jockeys to Social Capital Catalysts of the Knowledge Society.” Technovation 25(9):1039-1049.

Hart, David. 1998. Forged Consensus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Hashimoto, T. 1999. “The Hesitant Relationship Reconsidered: University-Industry Cooperation in Postwar Japan.” In Lewis M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkage in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hassan, Mohamed H.A. 2005. “Small Things and Big Changes in the Developing World.” Science 309: 65-66. July 1.

Hayashi, Fumio, and Edward C. Prescott. 2002. “The 1990s in Japan: A Lost Decade.” Review of Economic Dynamics 5(1):206-235.

Heller, M., and R. Eisenberg. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.” Science 280:698.

Henderson, J. V. 1986. “The Efficiency of Resource Usage and City Size.” Journal of Urban Economics 19(1):47-70.

Henderson, Jennifer A., and John J. Smith. 2002. “Academia, Industry, and the Bayh-Dole Act: An Implied Duty to Commercialize.” White Paper. Center for the Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology. Harvard University. October.

Henderson, R., L. Orsenigo, and G. P. Pisano. 1999. “The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in Molecular Biology: Interactions among Scientific, Institutional, and Organizational Change.” In D. C. Mowery and R. R. Nelson, eds. Sources of Industrial Leadership. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Henderson, R., M. Trajtenberg, and A. Jaffe. 1998. “Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1):119-127.

Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro, and K. Hamilton. 2001. “The Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the U.S.—A Portrait Based on Patent Analysis.” Research Policy 30(4):681-704.

Hilpert, U., and B. Ruffieux. 1991. “Innovation, Politics and Regional Development: Technology Parks and Regional Participation in High-Technology in France and West Germany.” In U. Hilpert, ed. Regional Innovation and Decentralization: High-Technology Industry and Government Policy. London, UK: Routledge.

Himmelberg, C., and B. C. Petersen. 1994. “R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 76(1):38-51.

Holtz-Eakin, D., D. Joulfian, and H. Rosen. 1994. “Striking it Out:

Entrepreneurial Survival and Liquidity Constraints.” Journal of Political Economy 102(1):53-75.

Hoshi, Takeo, and Anil Kashyap. 2004. “Japan’s Economic and Financial Crisis: An Overview.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives Winter.

Howell, Thomas, et al. 2003. China’s Emerging Semiconductor Industry. San Jose, CA: Semiconductor Industry Association, October.

Hu, Jintao. General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee. 2005. Keynote Speech. November 27.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Hu, Jintao. General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee. 2007. Speech to the Seventeenth Communist Party of China National Conference. October.

Hu, Jintao. President of China. 2009. Speech to United Nations General Assembly. September 22.

Hu, Zhijian. 2006. “IPR Policies In China: Challenges and Directions.” Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26.

Huang, Can, C. Amorim, M. Spinoglio, B. Gouveia and A. Medina. 2004. “Organization, Programme and Structure:An Analysis of the Chinese Innovation Policy Framework.” R&D Management 34(4).

Huang, Yasheng, and Tarun Khanna. 2003.“Can India Overtake China?” Foreign Policy July-August.

Huddleson, Lillian, and Vicki Daitch. 2002. True Genius—The Life and Science of John Bardeen. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

Hughes, Kent. 2005. Building the Next American Century: The Past and Future of American Economic Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Chapter 14.

Hughes, Kent. 2005. “Facing the Global Competitiveness Challenge.” Issues in Science and Technology XXI(4):72-78.

Hulsink, W., H. Bouwman, and T. Elfring. 2007. “Silicon Valley in the Polder? Entrepreneurial Ðynamics, Virtuous Clusters and Vicious Firms in the Netherlands and Flanders.” ERIM Report Series Research in Management (ERS-2007-048-ORG).

Hundley, Richard O. 1999. Past Revolutions, Future Transformations: What Can the History of Revolutions in Military Affairs Tell Us About Transforming the U.S. Military. Rand Corporation National Research Institute.

Iansati, Marco, and Roy Levien. 2005. The Keystone Advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Industrial Research Institute, Inc. 2001. “Industry-University Intellectual Property.” Position Paper. External Research Directors Network. April.

Inkpen, Andrew C. and Wang Pien. 2006. “An Examination of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park.” Journal of Management Studies 43(4):779-811.

Inside U.S.-China Trade. 2006. “Industry Worried China Backing out of Commitment to Join GPA.” September 27.

Jacob, Klaus, et al. 2005. “Lead Markets for Environmental Innovations.” ZEW Economic Studies. Volume 27. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

Jacobs, Tom. 2002. “Biotech Follows Dot.com Boom and Bust.” Nature 20(10):973.

Jaffe, A. B. 1989. “Real Effects of Academic Research.” American Economic Review 79(5):957-970.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Jaffe, A. B. 1997. Economic Analysis of Research Spillovers: Implications for the Advanced Technology Program. NIST GCR 97-708. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Jaffe, A. B. 1998. “The Importance of ‘Spillovers’ in the Policy Mission of the ATP.” Journal of Technology Transfer 23(1):11-19.

Jaffe, A. B. 2000. “The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process.” Research Policy 29:531-557.

Jaffe, A. B., and J. Lerner. 2006. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Jaffe, A. B., J. Lerner, and S. Stern, eds. 2003. Innovation Policy and the Economy. Volume 3. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3):577-598.

Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 1997. Comparative Science and Technology Policy. Elgar Reference Collection. International Library of Comparative Pubic Policy. Volume 5. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Jorgenson, D. W. 2001. “Information Technology and the U.S. Economy.” American Economic Review 91(1) March.

Jorgenson, D. W. 2001. “U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age.” Issues in Science and Technology Fall.

Jorgenson, D. W., and K. Motohashi. 2003. “The Role of Information Technology in the Economy: Comparison between Japan and the United States.” Prepared for RIETI/KEIO Conference on Japanese Economy: Leading East Asia in the 21st Century? Keio University. May 30.

Jorgenson, D. W. et al. 2005. Productivity: Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 2005.

Joy, William. 2000. “Why the Future Does Not Need Us.” Wired 8.04. April.

Kaelble, Steve. 2004. “Good Neighbors: Indiana’s Certified-Technology-park Program.” Indiana Business Magazine July 1.

Kaiser, Ulrich, et al. 2011. “Labor Mobility, Social Network Effects, and Innovative Activity.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5654.

Kapur, Devesh. 2003. “Indian Diaspora as a Strategic Asset.” Economic and Political Weekly 38(5):445-448.

Kawamoto, Takuji. 2004. “What Do the Purified Solow Residuals Tell Us about Japan’s Lost Decade?” Bank of Japan IMES Discussion Paper Series. No. 2004-E-5. Tokyo, Japan: Bank of Japan.

Kenney, Martin, ed. 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Ketzler, Rolf, and Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2009. “Publications: German Economic Research Institutes on Track.” Scientometrics 80(1):233-254.

Kim, Linsu. 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Kim, Yong-June. 2006. “A Korean Perspective on China’s Innovation System.” Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26.

Kinast, Juliane, Christian Reiermann, and Michael Sauga. 2007. “Labor Paradox in Germany: Where have the Skilled Workers Gone?” Spiegel Online June 22.

Kneller, R. 2003. “University-Industry Cooperation and Technology Transfer in Japan Compared with the U.S.: Another Reason for Japan’s Economic Malaise?” Journal of International Economic Law 24:329-450.

Koizumi, Kei. 2007. “Historical Trends in Federal R&D.” In AAAS Report XXXII: Research and Development FY2008. AAAS Publication Number 07-1A. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Kondo, Masayuki. 2003. “Chinese Model to Create High-Tech Start-Ups from Universities and Research Institutes.” In M. von Zedtwitz, G. Haour, T. Khalil, and L. Lefebvre, eds. Management of Technology: Growth through Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Kondo, Masayuki. 2004. “Policy Innovation in Science and Technology in Japan—from S&T Policy to Innovation Policy.” (In Japanese.) Journal of Science Policy and Research Management 19(3/4):132-140.

Kondo, Masayuki. 2005. “Spin-offs from Public Research Institutes as Domestic Technology Transfer Means—The Case of RIKEN and Riken Industrial Group.” (In Japanese.) Development Engineering 11:31-41.

Kortum, S., and J. Lerner. 1999. “What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?” Research Policy 28:1-22.

Koschatzky, Knut. 2003. “The Regionalization of Innovation Policy: New Options for Regional Change?” In G. Fuchs and Phil Shapira, eds. Rethinking Regional Innovation: Path Dependency or Regional Breakthrough? London, UK: Kluwer.

Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Krugman, Paul. 1994. “Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession.” Foreign Affairs March/April.

Kuhlmann, Stephan and Jakob Edler. 2003. “Scenarios of Technology and Innovation Policies in Europe: Investigating Future Governance—Group of 3.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 70.

Kumar, Deepak. 1995. Science and the Raj: 1857-1905. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lall, Sanjaya. 2002. “Linking FDI and Technology Development for Capacity Building and Strategic Competitiveness.” Transnational Corporations 11(3):39-88.

Lanjouw, J. O., and I. Cockburn. 2000. “Do Patents Matter? Empirical Evidence after GATT.” NBER Working Paper No. 7495.

Lanjouw, J. O., and J. Lerner 1997. “The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature.” NBER Working Paper No. W6296. Boston: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Laredo, Philippe, and Philippe Mustar, eds. 2001. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Larosse, J. 2004. Towards a ‘Third Generation’ Innovation Policy in Flanders: Policy Profile of the Flemish Innovation. Brussels, Belgium: IWT.

Lazowska, Edward D., and David Paterson. 2005. “An Endless Frontier Postponed.” Science 308(5723):757. May 6.

Lebra, Takie Sugiyama. 1971. “The Social Mechanism of Guilt and Shame: The Japanese Case.” Anthropological Quarterly 44(4):241-255.

Lembke, Johan. 2002. Competition for Technological Leadership: EU Policy for High Technology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Lemola, Tarmo. 2002. “Convergence of National Science and Technology Policies: The Case of Finland.” Research Policy 31(8-9):1481-1490.

Lerner, J. 1995. “Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors.” Journal of Law and Economics 38(October):463-495.

Lerner, J. 2002. “Patent Policy Shifts and Innovation Over 150 Years.” American Economic Review P&P. May.

Lerner, J., and J. Tirole. 2004. “Efficiency of Patent Pools.” American Economic Review 94(3):691-711.

Leslie, Stuart, and Robert Kargon. 2006. “Exporting MIT.” Osiris 21:110-130.

Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter. 1987.

“Appropriating the Returns to Industrial R&D.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 783-820.

Levitt, Rachelle, ed. 1987. The University/Real Estate Connection: Research Parks and Other Ventures. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

Lewis, James A. 2005. Waiting for Sputnik: Basic Research and Strategic Competition. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Leyden, D. P., A. N. Link, and D. S. Siegel. 2008. “A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Decision to Locate on a University Research Park.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55(1):23-28.

Li, Jianjun. 2006. “The Development and Opening of Tianjin Binhai: New Area & China’s Biotechnical Innovations.” Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26.

Licklider, J. C. R. 1960. “Man-Computer Symbiosis.” IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics. March.

Lin, Otto. 1998. “Science and Technology Policy and its Influence on the Economic Development of Taiwan.” In Henry S. Rowen, ed. Behind East Asian Growth: The Political and Social Foundations of Prosperity. New York: Routledge.

Lindelöf, P., and H. Löfsten. 2003. “Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden: Implications for Strategy and Performance.” Small Business Economics 20(3):245-258.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Lindelöf, P. and H. Löfsten. 2004. “Proximity as a Resource Base for Competitive Advantage: University-Industry Links for Technology Transfer.” Journal of Technology Transfer 29(3-4): 311-326.

Lindh, T., and Ohlsson, H. 1996. “Self-Employment and Windfall Gains: Evidence from the Swedish Lottery.” Economic Journal 106:1515-1526.

Link, A. N. 1981. “Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing: Some Additional Evidence.” American Economic Review 71(5):1111-1112.

Link, A. N. 1981. Research and Development Activity in U.S. Manufacturing. New York: Praeger.

Link, A. N. 1995. A Generosity of Spirit: The Early History of the Research Triangle Park. Research Triangle Park, NC: University of North Carolina Press for the Research Triangle Park Foundation.

Link, A. N. 2002. From Seed to Harvest: The Growth of the Research Triangle Park. Research Triangle Park, NC: University of North Carolina Press for the Research Triangle Park Foundation.

Link, A. N., and D. S. Siegel. 2003. Technological Change and Economic Performance. London, UK: Routledge.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 1998. Public Accountability: Evaluating Technology-Based Institutions. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2001. “Public/Private Partnerships: Stimulating Competition in a Dynamic Market.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 19(5):763-794.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2003. “The Growth of Research Triangle Park.” Small Business Economics 20(2):167-175.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2003. “U.S. Science Parks: The Diffusion of an Innovation and Its Effects on the Academic Mission of Universities.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1323-1356.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2005. “Opening the Ivory Tower’s Door: An Analysis of the Determinants of the Formation of U.S. University Spin-Off Companies.” Research Policy 34(7):1106-1112.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2006. “U.S. University Research Parks.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 25(1):43-55.

Link, A. N., and J. T. Scott. 2007. “The Economics of University Research Parks.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23(4):661-674.

Link, A. N., and K. R. Link. 2003. “On the Growth of U.S. Science Parks.” Journal of Technology Transfer 28(1):81-85.

Litan, Robert E., and Lesa Mitchell. 2008. “Should Universities be Agents of Economic Development?” Astra Briefs 7(7-8).

Locke, Gary. 2010. “Remarks on Clean Energy Trade Mission to China, Indonesia.” Briefing at the Washington Foreign Press Center. May 12.

Löfsten, Hans, and Peter Lindelöf. 2002. “Science Parks and the Growth of New Technology-based Firms—Academic-industry Links, Innovation and Markets.” Research Policy 31(6):859-876.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Long, Guogiang. 2005. “China’s Policies on FDI: Review and Evaluation.” In Theodore H. Moran, Edward M. Graham, and Magnus Blomström, eds. Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

Luger, M. I. 2007. “Smart Places for Smart People: Using Cluster-based Planning in the 21st Century.” In Creating Enterprise: Igniting Innovation through Business-University-Government Networks. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Luger, M. I., and H. A. Goldstein. 1991. Technology in the Garden. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Luger, M. I., and H. A. Goldstein. 2006. Research Parks Redux: The Changing Landscape of the Garden. Washington, DC: U.S. Economic Development Administration.

Lundstörm, A., and L. Stevenson. 2001. Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future. Stockholm, Sweden: FSF.

Lynn, Leonard. 2006. “Collaborative Advantage and China’s Evolving Position in the Global Technology System.” Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26.

Maddison, Angus, and Donald Johnston. 2001. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Malecki, E. J. 1991. Technology and Economic Development. New York: John Wiley.

Mani, Sunil. 2004. “Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis.” International Journal of Technology and Globalization 1(1).

Mansfield, E. 1986. “Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study.” Management Science 32:173-181.

Mansfield, E. 1996. Estimating Social and Private Returns from Innovations Based on the Advanced Technology Program: Problems and Opportunities. GCR 99-780. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Mansfield, E. 1996. “How Fast Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?” Journal of Industrial Economics 34(2):217-224.

Marshall, Andrew. 1993. “Some Thoughts on Military Revolutions-Second Version.” Memorandum for the Record. August 23.

Mazuzan, George. 1988. The National Science Foundation: A Brief History (1950-1985). NSF 88-16. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

McKibben, William. 2003. Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

Megginson, William L. 2004. “Towards a Global Model of Venture Capital?” Journal of Applied and Corporate Finance 16(1).

Merges, R. P. 1996. “A Comparative Look at Intellectual Property Rights and the Software Industry.” In David C. Mowery, ed. The International Software Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Merges, R. P., and R. R. Nelson. 1990. “On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope.” Columbia Law Review 90:839-916.

Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159(3810):56-63.

METI. 2003. The 2003 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Small Business Research Institute.

METI. 2005. The 2005 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Small Business Research Institute.

MEXT. 2004. Annual Report on Science and Technology Promotion Measures 2004: White Paper on Science and Technology. (Heisei 16 nendo Kagaku-Gijutu Sinkou-ni-kansuru Nenji-houkoku). MEXT.

Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder. 2001. “The German Innovation System.” Pp. 205-252 in P. Larédo and P. Mustar, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Meyer-Krahmer, Frieder. 2001. “Industrial Innovation and Sustainability—Conflicts and Coherence.” Pp. 177-195 in Daniele Archibugi and Bengt-Ake Lundvall, eds. The Globalizing Learning Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Middleton, Andrew, and Steven Bowns. With Keith Hartley and James Reid. 2006. “The Effect of Defense R&D on Military Equipment Quality.” Defense and Peace Economics 17(2):117-139. April.

Miller, Roger, and Marcel Cote. 1987. Growing the Next Silicon Valley: A Guide for Successful Regional Planning. Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company.

Mills, K, E. Reynolds, and A Reamer. 2008. Clusters and Competitiveness: A New Federal Role for Stimulating Regional Economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. 2006. New Economic Growth Strategies 2006. Tokyo, Japan: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. (In Japanese).

Mitra, Raja. 2006. “India’s Potential as a Global R&D Power.” In Magnus Karlsson, ed. The Internationalization of Corporate R&D. Östersund: Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.

Miyata, Shinpei. 1983. A Free Paradise for Scientists. (In Japanese.) Bungeishunju.

Mody, Ashok, and Carl Dahlman. 1992. “Performance and Potential of Information Technology: An International Perspective.” World Development 20(12):1703-1719.

Mooris, P. R. 1990. A History of The World Semiconductor Industry. Stevenage, UK: Peter Peregrinus Ltd.

Morrison, Wayne M. 2010. “China-U.S. Trade Issues” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. June 1.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Moser, P. 2001. “How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth Century World Fairs.” University of California at Berkeley. Working Paper.

Motohashi, Kazuyuki. 2005. “University-industry Collaborations in Japan: The Role of New Technology-based Firms in Transforming the National Innovation System.” Research Policy 34:583-594.

Motohashi, Kazuyuki, and Xiao Yun. 2007. “China’s Innovation System Reform and Growing Industry and Science Linkages.” Research Policy 36:1251-1260.

Mowery, D. C., and A. A. Ziedonis. 2002. “Academic Patent Quality and Quantity Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States.” Research Policy 31(3):399-418.

Mowery, D. C., and B. N. Sampat. 2005. “The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University-Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments?” Journal of Technology Transfer 30(1/2):115-127.

Mowery, D. C., R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A. Ziedonis. 2001. “The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980.” Research Policy 30.

Mowery, D. C., R. Nelson, B. Sampat, and A. Ziedonis. 2003. The Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Muro, Mark and S. Rahman. 2010. “Budget 2011: Industry Clusters as a Paradigm for Job Growth,” Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program. June 10.

Murphy, L. M., and P. L. Edwards. 2003. Bridging the Valley of Death: Transitioning from Public to Private Sector Financing. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. May.

Mustar, Phillipe, and Phillipe Laredo. 2002. “Innovation and Research Policy in France (1980-2000) or the Disappearance of the Colbertist State.” Research Policy 31:55-72.

Nadiri I. 1993. Innovations and Technological Spillovers. NBER Working Paper No. 4423. Boston, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Nagaoka, Sadao. 2007. “Assessing the R&D Management of Firms by Patent Citation: Evidence from the U.S. Patents.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(1).

Nagaoka, Sadao, Naotoshi Tsukada, and Tomoyuki Shimbo. 2006. “The Emergence and Structure of Essential Patents of Standards: Lessons from Three IT Standards.” IIR Working Paper WP#06-08. Institute of Innovation Research. Hitotsubashi University.

Nakamura, K., Y. Okada, and A. Tohei. 2006. “Does the Public Sector Make a Significant Contribution to Biomedical Research in Japan? A Detailed Analysis of Government and University Patenting, 1991-2002.” Discussion Paper Series. Competition Policy Research Center. Fair Trade Commission of Japan. CPDP25-E.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Nakayama, Yasuo, Mitsuaki Hosono, Nobuya Fukugawa, and Masayuki Kondo. 2005. University-Industry Cooperation: Joint Research and Contract Research. (In Japanese.) NISTEP Research Material. No. 119. Tokyo, Japan: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. 2007 Is America Falling Off the Flat Earth? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Academy of Sciences/National Academy of Engineering/Insitute of Medicine. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Institute of Science and Technology Policy and Mitsubishi Research Institute. 2005. Government S&T Budget Analysis during the First and Second S&T Basic Plans. (Dai-ikki oyobi dai-niki Kagaku-Gijutu-Kihonkeikaku kikanchuu no kenkyuu-kaihatu-soushi no naiyou-bunseki). NISTEP Report No. 84. March.

National Manufacturing Competitiveness Council. 2006. “The National Strategy for Manufacturing.” New Delhi, India. March.

National Research Council. 1982. Scientific Communication and National Security. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1987. Balancing the National Interest: U.S. National Security Export Controls and Global Economic Competition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1996. Conflict and Cooperation in National Competition for High-?echnology Industry. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1999. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

National Research Council. 1999. Defense Manufacturing in 2010 and Beyond. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1999. Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1999. Industry-Laboratory Partnerships: A Review of the Sandia Science and Technology Park Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1999. New Vistas in Transatlantic Science and Technology Cooperation. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 1999. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2000. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: A Review of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2000. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance. David C. Mowery, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. Capitalizing on New Needs and New Opportunities: Government-Industry Partnerships in Biotechnology and Information Technologies. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research 1998 to 2000. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. A Review of the New Initiatives at the NASA Ames Research Center. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2001. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Stephen A. Merrill, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2003. Government-Industry Partnerships for the Development of New Technologies: Summary Report. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2003. Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to Support the Semiconductor Industry. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2004. Productivity and Cyclicality in Semiconductors: Trends, Implications, and Questions. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2004. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Program Diversity and Assessment Challenges. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2005. Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Superconducting. Susan L. Graham, Marc Snir, and Cynthia A. Patterson, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

National Research Council. 2005. Large-Scale Biomedical Science Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2005. Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Post-doctoral Scholars in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2007. Enhancing Productivity Growth in the Information Age: Measuring and Sustaining the New Economy. Dale W. Jorgenson and Charles W. Wessner, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2007. India’s Changing Innovation System: Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities for Cooperation. Charles W. Wessner and Sujai J. Shivakumar, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2007. Innovation Inducement Prices at the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2007. Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2007. SBIR and the Phase III Challenge of Commercialization. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Energy. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2008. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Science Foundation. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2008. Innovative Flanders: Innovation Policies for the 21st Century. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2008. Innovation in Global Industries: U.S. Firms Competing in a New World. Jeffrey T. Macher and David C Mowery, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2009. 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change. Sadao Nagaoka, Masayuki Kondo, Kenneth Flamm, and Charles Wessner, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the Department of Defense. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Institutes of Health. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

National Research Council. 2009. An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2009. Revisiting the Department of Defense SBIR Fast Track Initiative. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2009. Understanding Research, Science, and Technology Parks: Global Best Practices. Charles W. Wessner, ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2010. Choosing Our Nation’s Fiscal Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council 2010. The Dragon and the Elephant, Understanding the Development of Innovation Capacity in China and India. S. Merrill ed., Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2010. Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest, Stephen A. Merrill and Ann-Marie Mazza, editors, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2010. S&T Strategies of Six Countries: Implications for the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. 2011. Building the 21st Century: U.S.-China Cooperation in Science, Technology, and Innovation. Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2011. The Future of Photovoltaics Manufacturing in the United States. Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2011. Growing Innovation Clusters for American Prosperity. Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur. Washington, DC : The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2011. Research Training in the Biomedical, Behavioral and Clinical Research Sciences. Washington, DC.; The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2012. Breaking Through: Ten Strategic Actions to Leverage Our Research Universities for the Future of America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2012. Building Hawaii’s Innovation Economy. Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. 2012. Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policy for the Global Economy. Charles W. Wessner and Alan Wm. Wolff, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. Forthcoming. Building the U.S. Battery Industry for Electric-Drive Vehicles: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

National Research Council. Forthcoming. Clustering for 21st Century Prosperity. Charles W. Wessner, Rapporteur. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board. 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board. 2008. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board. 2010. Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Board. 2011. Science and Engineering Indicators 2011. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Foundation. 2004. Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 2003. NSF 05-300. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Needham, Joseph. 1954-1986. Science and Civilization in China. (Five volumes.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, R. R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. R., and K. Nelson. 2002. “Technology, Institutions, and Innovation Systems.” Research Policy 31:265-272.

Nelson, R. R., and N. Rosenberg. 1993. “Technical Innovation and National Systems.” In National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Richard R. Nelson, ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Neuffer, John. 2010 “China: Intellectual Property Infringement, Indigenous Innovation Policies, and Frameworks for Measuring the Effects on the U.S. Economy.” Testimony to the United States International Trade Commission Investigation. June 15.

Nishimura, Kiyohiko, G., Takanobu Nakajima, and Kozo Kiyota. 2003. “Does the Natural Selection Mechanism Still Work in Severe Recessions? Examination of the Japanese Economy in the 1990s.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58:53-78.

Odagari, H. 1999. “University-Industry Collaboration in Japan: Facts and Interpretations.” In Lewis M. Branscomb, Fumio Kodama, and Richard Florida, eds. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkage in Japan and the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Odagiri, H., and A. Goto. 1993. “The Japanese System of Innovation: Past, Present and Future.” In R. R. Nelson, ed. National Systems of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Odagiri, H., and A. Goto. 1996. Technology and Industrial Development in Japan: Building Capabilities by Learning, Innovation and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1999. Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. The New Economy: Beyond the Hype—The OECD Growth Project. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Social Sciences and Innovation. Washington, DC: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. Summary Report: Micro-policies for Growth and Productivity. DSTI/IND(2004)7. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. October.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2008. Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2008. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: China. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Orszag, Peter, and Thomas Kane. 2003. “Funding Restrictions at Public Universities: Effects and Policy Implications.” Brookings Institution Working Paper. September.

Oughton, Christine. 1997. “Competitiveness in the 1990s.” The Economic Journal 107(444): 1486-1503.

Oughton, Christine, Mikel Landabaso, and Kevin Morgan. 2002. “The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1).

Owens, William, with Edward Offley. 2001. Lifting the Fog of War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Park, W. G., and J. C. Ginarte. 1997. “Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth.” Contemporary Economic Policy XV(July):51-61.

Ozgen, Ceren, et al. 2011. “Immigration and Innovation in European Regions.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 5676.

Patel, P., and K. Pavitt. 1994. “National Innovation Systems: Why They are Important and How They Might Be Compared?” Economic Change and Industrial Innovation.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Peck, M. J., R. C. Levin, and Akira Goto. 1988. “Picking Losers: Public Policy Toward Declining Industries in Japan.” In J. B. Shoven, ed. Government Policy Toward Industry in the United States and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 165-239.

Peek, Joe, and Eric S. Rosengren. 2005. “Unnatural Selection: Perverse Incentives and the Misallocation of Credit in Japan.” The American Economic Review 95(4):114-1166.

Penrose, E. 1951. The Economics of the International Patent System. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Perez, Carlota. 2002. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Phan, Phillip H., and Donald S. Siegel. 2006. “The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned from Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the U.S. and U.K.” Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics 0609. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Department of Economics.

Phan, Phillip H., Donald S. Siegel, and Mike Wright. 2005. “Science Parks and Incubators: Observations, Synthesis and Future Research.” Journal of Business Venturing 20(2):165-182.

Phillimore, J. 1999. “Beyond the Linear View of Innovation in Science Park Evaluation: An Analysis of Western Australian Technology Park.” Technovation 19(11):673-680.

Polenske, Karen, Nicolas Rockler, et al. 2004. Closing the Competitive Gap: A Retrospective Analysis of the ATP 2mm Project. NIST GCR 03-856. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Porter, M. E., 1998. “Clusters and the New Economics of Competition.” Harvard Business Review 76(6):77-90.

Porter, M. E., and M. Sakakibara. 2004. “Competition in Japan.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(1).

Posen, Adam. 1998. Restoring Japan’s Economic Growth. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Posen, Adam. 2001. “Japan.” In Benn Steil, David G. Victor, and Richard R. Nelson, eds. Technological Innovation and Economic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Powell, Jeanne, and Francisco Moris. 2002. Different Timelines for Different Technologies. NISTIR 6917. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2004. “Sustaining the Nation’s Innovation Ecosystems.” Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. January.

President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee. 2005. “Cybersecurity: A Crisis of Prioritization.” Report to the President. February.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2006. “China’s Impact on the Semiconductor Industry: 2005 Update.” New York: PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Procassini, Andrew. 1995. Competitors in Alliance: Industry Associations, Global Rivalries, and Business-Government Relations. New York: Greenwood Publishing.

Purvis, G. 2002. “Moving into the Real World.” Electronic Business July 1.

Qiang, Christine Zhen-Wei. 2004. Contribution of Information and Communication Technologies to Growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Qiang, Christine Zhen-Wei. 2009. Broadband Infrastructure Investment in Stimulus Packages: Relevance for Developing Countries. Washington DC: World Bank.

Reid, T. R. 2004. The United States of Europe: The New Superpower and the End of American Supremacy. New York: Penguin Press.

Reiko, Yamada. 2001. “University Reform in the Post-massification Era in Japan: Analysis of Government Education Policy for the 21st Century.” Higher Education Policy 14(4).

Reuters. 2006. “China Sees No Quick End to Economic Boom.” February 21.

Rich, Ben. 1996. Skunkworks. New York: Back Bay Books.

Rodrik, Dani and Arvind Subramanian. 2004. “From ‘Hindu Growth’ to Productivity Surge: The Mystery of the Indian Growth Transition.” NBER Working Paper 10376.

Romer, Paul. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98:72-102.

Rosenberg, N., and R. Nelson. 1994. “American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry.” Research Policy 23:325-348.

Rosenzweig, R., and B. Turlington. 1982. The Research Universities and Their Patrons. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Rothaermel, F. T., and M. C. Thursby. 2005. “Incubator Firm Failure or Graduation? The Role of University Linkages.” Research Policy 34(7):1076-1090.

Rothaermel, F. T., and M. C. Thursby. 2005. “University-Incubator Firm Knowledge Flows: Assessing Their Impact on Incubator Firm Performance.” Research Policy 34(3):302-320.

Rowen, Henry S., and A. Maria Toyoda. 2002. “From Kiretsu to Start-ups: Japan’s Push for High Tech Entrepreneurship.” Asia-Pacific Research Center Working Paper. Stanford, CA.

Ruegg, Rosalie, and Irwin Feller. 2003. A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP’s First Decade. NIST GCR 03-857. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Ruttan, Vernon W. 2002. Technology, Growth and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. Is War Necessary for Economic Growth, Military Procurement and Technology Development? New York: Oxford University Press.

Ruttan, Vernon W. 2006. “Will Government Programs Spur the Next Breakthrough?” Issues in Science and Technology Winter.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Rutten, Roel, and Frans Boekema. 2005. “Innovation, Policy and Economic Growth: Theory and Cases.” European Planning Studies 13(8).

Rycroft, Robert W., and Don E. Kash. 1999. “Innovation Policy for Complex Technologies.” Issues in Science and Technology Fall.

Saito, Ken. 1987. Research on a New Concern: RIKEN Industrial Group. (In Japanese.) Jichosha

Sakakibara, M., and L. Branstetter. 2001. “Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent law Reforms.” Rand Journal of Economics 32:77-100.

Sakakibara, M., and L. Branstetter. 2002. Measuring the Impact of ATP-Funded Research Consortia on Research Productivity of Participating Firms, A Framework Using Both U.S. and Japanese Data. NIST GCR 02-830. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Sakamoto, Kozo, and Masayuki Kondo. 2004. “The Analysis of University-Industry Research Collaborations by Time Series and Corporate Characteristics.” (In Japanese.) Development Engineering 10:11-26.

Sallet, J, J. Masterman, and E. Paisley. 2009. “The Geography of Innovation.” Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

Sapolsky, Harvey M. 1990. Science and the Navy—The History of the Office of Naval Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schaffer, Teresita. 2002. “Building a New Partnership with India.” Washington Quarterly 25(2):31-44.

Scherer, F. M. 2001. “U.S. Government Programs to Advance Technology.” Revue d’Economie Industrielle 0(94):69-88.

Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1996. “Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products Be Patentable?” Rand Journal of Economics 27:322-331.

Scotchmer, Suzanne. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Shane, S. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Shang, Yong. 2006. “Innovation: New National Strategy of China.” Presentation at Industrial Innovation in China. Levin Institute Conference. July 24-26.

Shanghai Municipal Government. 2004. Notice of the Shanghai Municipal Government Regarding Distributing the Outline of Shanghai’s Intellectual Property Strategy (2004-2010). September 14.

Shapiro, Carl. 2001. “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross License, Patent Pools and Standard-Setting.” In Adam Jaffe, Joshua Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Shearmur, R., and D. Doloreux. 2000. “Science Parks: Actors or Reactors? Canadian Science Parks in their Urban Context.” Environment and Planning 32(6):1065-1082.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Sheehan, Jerry, and Andrew Wyckoff. 2003. “Targeting R&D: Economic and Policy Implications of Increasing R&D Spending.” DSTI/DOC(2003)8. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Shenzhen Daily. 2005. “Nation May Introduce Antimonopoly Law.” December 30.

Sherwin, Martin, and Kai Bird. 2005. American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Shin, Roy W. 1997. “Interactions of Science and Technology Policies in Creating a Competitive Industry: Korea’s Electronics Industry.” Global Economic Review 26(4):3-19.

Siegel, Donald S., David Waldman, and Albert Link. 2004. “Toward a Model of the Effective Transfer of Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technologies.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 21(1-2):115-142.

Siegel, Donald S., P. Westhead, and M. Wright. 2003. “Assessing the Impact of Science Parks on Research Productivity: Exploratory Firm-Level Evidence from the United Kingdom.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1357-1369.

Simon, Dennis and Cong Cao. 2009. China’s Emerging Technological Edge: Addressing the Role of High-End Talent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skolnikoff, Eugene B. 1993. “Knowledge Without Borders? Internationalization of the Research Universities.” Daedalus 122(4).

Smith, Kathlin. 1998. The Role of Scientists in Normalizing U.S.-China Relations: 1965-1979. Council on Library and Information Resources

Smits, Ruud, and Stefan Kuhlmann. 2004. “The Rise of Systemic Instruments in Innovation Policy.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1(1/2).

Soete, Luc G., and Bastiann J. ter Weel. 1999. “Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Technology Policy: The Case of the Netherlands.” De Economist 147(3). September.

Sofouli, E., and N. S. Vonortas. 2007. “S&T Parks and Business Incubators in Middle-Sized Countries: The Case of Greece.” Journal of Technology Transfer 32(5):525-544.

Solow, Robert. 2000. Growth Theory: An Exposition. 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Solow, Robert. 2000.“Toward a Macroeconomics of the Medium Run.” Journal of Economic Perspectives Winter.

Spence, Michael. 1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Spencer, W. J., L. Wilson, and R. Doering. 2004. “The Semiconductor Technology Roadmap.” Future Fab International 18.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Springut, Micah, et al. 2011. “China’s Program for Science and Technology Modernization: Implications for American Competitiveness.” U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. January.

Stanford University. 1999. Inventions, Patents and Licensing: Research Policy Handbook. Document 5.1. July 15.

State Council of the Peoples’ Republic of China. 2006. Outline of the National Medium- and Long-term Program on Scientific and Technological Development (2006-2020). February 9.

Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. 2005. Report on the Survey of Research and Development 2004. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

Stephan, P. 2001. “Educational Implication of University-Industry Technology Transfer.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26:199-205.

Sternberg, R. 1990. “The Impact of Innovation Centres on Small Technology-based Firms: The Example of the Federal Republic of Germany.” Small Business Economics 2(2):105-118.

Stiglitz, Joseph. 2005. “The Ethical Economist.” Foreign Affairs. November/December.

Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Strout, E. 2005. “Gift of a Book Was a Key to Intel Founder’s Big Donation to City College of New York.” Chronicle of Higher Education. December 2. P. A27.

Swann, G. M. P. 1998. “Towards a Model of Clustering in High-Technology Industries.” In G. M. P. Swann, M. Prevezer, and D. Stout, eds. The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Talele, Chitram J. 2003. “Science and Technology Policy in Germany, India and Pakistan.” Indian Journal of Economics and Business 2(1):87-100.

Tanaka, Nobua. 2005. Presentation at the International Forum on Technology Foresight and National Innovation Strategies. Seoul, Republic of Korea. November 4.

Tassey, G. 1997. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Tassey, G. 2004. “Policy Issues for R&D Investment in a Knowledge-based Economy.” Journal of Technology Transfer 29:153-185.

Tassey, G. 2007. The Innovation Imperative. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Teubal, Morris. 2002. “What Is the Systems Perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy and How Can We Apply It to Developing and Newly Industrialized Economies?” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12(1-2).

Thelin, J. 2004. A History of American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Thomas, J. R., and W. H. Schacht. 2008. “Patent Reform in the 110th Congress: Innovation Issues.” Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Order Code RL33996.

Thursby, J., and M. Thursby. 2002. “Who is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing.” Management Science 48:90-104.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Thursby, J., and M. Thursby. 2004. “Industry Perspectives on Licensing University Technologies: Sources and Problems.” AUTM Journal P. 2000.

U.S. Congress. 1988. Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-418, codified in 15 U.S.C. 278n.) and later amended by the American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-245, codified in 15 U.S.C. 3701).

U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008. Innovation Measurement: Tracking the State of Innovation in the American Economy, Report to the Secretary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. January.

U.S. General Accounting Office. 2002. Export Controls: Rapid Advances in China’s Semiconductor Industry Underscore Need for Fundamental U.S. Policy Review. GAO-020620. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office. April.

U.S. Small Business Administration. 2004. “Small Business by the Numbers.” Office of Advocacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration. June.

Vaidyanathan, G. 2008. “Technology Parks in a Developing Country: The Case of India.” Journal of Technology Transfer 33(3):285-299.

Van Atta, Richard. 2004. “Energy and Climate Change Research and the DARPA Model.” Presentation to the Washington Roundtable on Science and Public Policy. November 3.

Van Atta, Richard. 2008. “Fifty Years of Innovation and Discovery.” In DARPA: 50 Years of Bridging the Gap. Arlington, VA: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. April.

Van Atta, Richard, and Michael Lippitz. 2003. Transformation and Transition: DARPA’s Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs. Volume 1: Overall Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.

Van Atta, Richard, et al. 1991. DARPA Technical Accomplishments. Volumes I-V. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.

Van Atta, Richard, et al. 1991. DARPA Technological Accomplishments: An Historical Review of Selected DARPA Projects. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.

Van Looy, Bart, K. Debackere, and T. Magerman. 2005. Assessing Academic Patent Activity: The Case of Flanders. Leuven, Belgium: SOOS.

Van Looy, Bart, Marina Ranga, Julie Callaert, Koenraad Debackere, and Edwin Zimmermann. 2004. “Combining Entrepreneurial and Scientific Performance in Academia: Towards a Compounded and Reciprocal Matthew-effect?” Research Policy 33(3):425-441.

Vedovello, C. 1997. “Science Parks and University-Industry Interaction: Geographical Proximity between the Agents as a Driving Force.” Technovation 17(9):491-502.

Vest, C. 2005. “Industry, Philanthropy and Universities-The Roles and Influences of the Private Sector in Higher Education.” 2005 Clark Kerr Lecture. University of California at Berkeley. September 13.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

Wadhwa, Vivek, and Gary Gereffi. 2005. Framing the Engineering Outsourcing Debate. Durham, NC: Duke University.

Walcott, Susan M. 2003. Chinese Science and Technology Industrial Parks. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

Waldrop, M. Mitchell. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Waldrop, M. Mitchell. 2001. The Dream Machine. New York: Viking Press. Wall Street Journal. 2010. “Loan Squeeze Thwarts Small-Business Revival.” March 15.

Walsh, J. P., and W. M. Cohen. 2004. “Does the Golden Goose Travel? A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D in the U.S. and Japan.” Mimeo.

Wang, Liwei. 1993. “The Chinese Traditions Inimical to the Patent Law.” Northwestern Journal of International Lawand Commerce Fall.

Warsh, David. 2006. Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations. New York: W. W. Norton.

Wiener, Norbert. 1948. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Wen, Jiang, and Shinichi Kobayashi. 2001. “Exploring Collaborative R&D Network: Some New Evidence in Japan.” Research Policy 30:1309-1319.

Wessner, Charles W. 2005. “Entrepreneurship and the Innovation Ecosystem.” In David B. Audretsch, Heike Grimm, and Charles W. Wessner, eds. Local Heroes in the Global Village: Globalization and the New Entrepreneurship Policies. New York: Springer.

Westhead, P. 1995. “New Owner-Managed Businesses in Rural and Urban Areas in Great Britian: A Matched Pairs Comparison.” Regional Studies 29(4):367-380.

Westhead, P., and D. Storey. 1997. “Financial Constraints on the Growth of High-Technology Small Firms in the U.K.” Applied Financial Economics 7(2):197-201.

Westhead, P., and M. Cowling. 1995. “Employment Change in Independent Owner-Managed High-Technology Firms in Great Britain.” Small Business Economics 7(2):111-140.

Westhead, P., and S. Batstone. 1998. “Independent Technology-based Firms: The Perceived Benefits of a Science Park Location.” Urban Studies 35(12):2197-2219.

World Bank. 2004. Innovation Systems: World Bank Support of Science and Technology Development. Vinod Kumar Goel, ed. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank. 2006. The Environment for Innovation in India. South Asia Private Sector Development and Finance Unit. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank International Finance Corporation. 2006. Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

World Trade Organization Working Party on the Accession of China. 2001. Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China. WT/MN(01)/3. November 10.

Wu, Ching. 2006. “China to Build 30 New Science and Technology Parks.” SciDev.net. April 19.

Yan, Dai. 2004. “Anti-Monopoly Legislation on the Way.” China Daily June 18.

Yoshida, Fujio. 1967. “Preparation of Legal System for Capital Liberalization (Part 3).” Panel Discussion in Zaikei Shoho. July 17.

Yoshida, Junko. 2006. “Grenoble Lure: Un-French R&D.” EE Times June 12.

Young, John. 2007. Info Memo for Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates. DoD Science and Technology Program. August 24.

Yukio, Sato. 2001. “The Structure and Perspective of Science and Technology Policy in Japan.” In Phillipe Laredo and Phillipe Mustar, eds. Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Zachary, G. Pascal. 1999. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Zeigler, Nicholas J. 1997. Governing Ideas: Strategies for Innovation in France and Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Zemin, Jiang, General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee. 1999. Keynote Speech at the National Technological Innovation Conference, August 23.

Zhang, Chunlin, Douglas Zhihua Zeng, William Peter Mako, and James Seward. 2009. Promoting Enterprise-Led Innovation in China, 2009. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

Ziedonis, R. H., and B. H. Hall. 2001. “The Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry.” In Gary Libecap, ed., Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes: New Studies of Entrepreneurship in the United States. Volume 13 of Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 186
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 187
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 188
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 189
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 190
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 191
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 192
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 193
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 194
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 195
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 196
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 197
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 198
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 199
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 200
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 201
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 202
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 203
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 204
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 205
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 206
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 207
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 208
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 209
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 210
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 211
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 212
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 213
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 214
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 215
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 216
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 217
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 219
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Bibliography." National Research Council. 2012. Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13488.
×
Page 220
Meeting Global Challenges: German-U.S. Innovation Policy: Summary of a Symposium Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $49.00 Buy Ebook | $39.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

While nations have always competed for territory, mineral riches, water, and other physical assets, they compete most vigorously today for technology-based innovations and the value that flows from them. Much of this value is based on creating scientific knowledge and transforming it into new products and services for the market. This process of innovation is complex and interdisciplinary. Sometimes it draws on the genius of individuals, but even then it requires sustained collective effort, often underpinned by significant national investments. Capturing the value of these investments to spur domestic economic growth and employment is a challenge in a world where the outputs of innovation disseminate rapidly. Those equipped to understand, apply, and profit from new knowledge and technical advances are increasingly able to capture the long-term economic benefits of growth and employment.

In response to this new, more distributed innovation paradigm, the National Academies Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) convened leading academics, business leaders, and senior policymakers from Germany and the United States to examine the strengths and challenges of their innovation systems. More specifically, they met to compare their respective approaches to innovation, to learn from their counterparts about best practices and shared challenges, and to identify cooperative opportunities. The symposium was held in Berlin and organized jointly by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) and the U.S. National Academies with support of the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) and the American Embassy in Berlin.

Both U.S. and German participants described common challenges on a wide variety of issues ranging from energy security and climate change to low-emissions transportation, early-stage financing, and workforce training. While recognizing their differences in approach to these challenges, participants on both sides drew out valuable lessons from each other's policies and practices. Participants were also aware of the need to adapt to a new global environment where many countries have focused new policy measures and new resources to support innovative firms and promising industries. Meeting Global Challenges: U.S.-German Innovation Policy reviews the participants meeting and sets goals and recommendations for future policy.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!