Click for next page ( 4

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 3
2 OPENING PLENARY Lorelle Espinosa, Director of Policy and Strategic Initiatives at the Institute for Higher Education Policy in Washington, gave the plenary speech. She explained that more research on different populations will contribute to both the translation of research into practice and to the framing of theoretical work on the intersection of race and gender. Studies on men of color1 can benefit, she said, from previous research and assessment of programmatic activities on gender that have focused on women and girls, adding that findings from prior theoretical work may be applicable to men and boys. For example, research on intersectionality2 for minority males could refer to Black Feminist Theory as it looks at gender, race, and socioeconomic status. For research on men of color, Espinosa noted that it was important to take into account where they are in terms of their institution of higher education (e.g., community colleges and minority-serving institutions). It is also important to consider the geographic location of populations of young (precollege) minority males, as there are distinct geographic differences in the largest minority populations on the east and west coasts as well as the southern borders (see Figure 1). 1 The terms “men of color,” “minority males,” and “underrepresented minority males” are used interchangeably in this report. 2 The term intersectionality is used “to denote the various ways in which race and gender interact to shape the multiple dimensions” of an individual’s experience. The term is often used in research on African American women. The core concept of intersectionality is that one cannot understand the full impact “wholly by looking at the race or gender dimensions of those experiences separately.” Source: Kimberle Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity, Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, 1241, 1993. 3

OCR for page 3
FIGURE 1. Large metro areas with majority-minority child (under 18) populations, 2008. SOURCE: Brookings Institution, 2010. In response to an audience member’s question, Espinosa agreed that it was important to look at research data on minority men in a disaggregated manner and that data for any single minority group may look very different from aggregated data across groups. Disaggregating the data by populations, regions, or ethnicities is critical to identifying target populations and capturing their unique characteristics as it relates to STEM participation. To illustrate, she referred to her slides on the top BS-granting colleges for minority males in STEM in 2007 (Table 1), showing that very few schools are listed as top producers for more than one minority male population. 4

OCR for page 3
TABLE 1. Top Ten BS-Granting Colleges/Universities for Minority Males in STEM, 2007 Black Men Latino Men Native American Men Asian Pacific Islander Men 1 Southern University University of Oklahoma State University of California, and A&M College Puerto Rico, University Berkeley Mayaguez 2 Florida A&M Florida University of University of California, University International Oklahoma, Norman Davis University 3 North Carolina A&T University of Southeastern University of California, San State University Texas, El Paso Oklahoma State Diego University 4 University of Universidad Northeastern State University of California, Phoenix Politecnica de University Irvine Puerto Rico 5 Strayer University University of North California State University of California, Los Texas, Austin University, Raleigh Angeles 6 Alabama A&M University of University of North University of Texas, Austin University Florida Carolina, Pembroke 7 Howard University University of Arizona State University of Washington, Texas, Pan University Seattle American 8 Prairie View A&M Texas A&M University of Arizona San Jose State University University University 9 University of California State East Central University California State Polytechnic Florida Polytechnic University, Pomona University, Pomona 10 University of The University of University of University of Illinois, Urbana- Maryland, Texas, San Washington, Seattle Champaign Baltimore County Antonio SOURCE: Lorelle Espinosa, Institute for Higher Education Policy, Presentation on August 9, 2010. 5