Dorph, R., Shields, P., Tiffany-Morales, J., Hartry, A., and McCaffrey, T. (2011). High hopes—few opportunities: The status of elementary science education in California. Sacramento, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd. Available: [July 2012].

Dorph, R., Schunn, C., Crowley, K., and Shields, P. (2012). Activating young science learners: Igniting persistent engagement in science learning and inquiry. A structured poster session presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Gamoran, A., Anderson, C.W., Quiroz, P.A., Secada, W.G., Williams, T., and Ashmann, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., and Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.

Garet, M.S., Wayne, A., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Eaton, M., Walters, K., Song, M., Brown, S., Hurlburt, S., Zhu, P., Sepanik, S., and Doolittle, F. (2011). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation. NCEE 2011-4024. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., and Trouche, L. (Eds.). (2012). Mathematics curriculum material and teacher development: From text to “lived” resources. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Hartry, A., Dorph, R., Shields, P., Tiffany-Morales, J., and Romero, V. (2012). The status of middle school science education in California. Sacramento, CA: The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd. Available: [October 2012].

Hidi, S., and Renninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.

Higher Education Research Institute. (2010). Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors. Available:,%20Eagan,%20Chang%20-%20Degrees%20of%20Success.pdf [August 2012].

Hill, H.C., and Ball, D.L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.

Hill, H.C., Schilling, S.G., and Ball, D.L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11-30.

Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., and Ball, D.L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.

Hill, C.J., Bloom, H.S., Black, A.R., and Lipsey, M.W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172-177.

Hochberg, E., and Desimone, L. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 89-106.

Hudson, S.B., McMahon, K.C., and Overstreet, C.M. (2002). The national survey of science and mathematics education: Compendium of tables. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research. Available: [October 2012].

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement