Greenstone, M., and T. Gayer. 2007. Quasi-Experimental and Experimental Approaches to Environmental Economics. Discussion Paper 07-22. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. June 2007 [online]. Available: http://www.rff.org/documents/rff-dp-07-22.pdf [accessed Apr. 11, 2012].

Hackett, E.J., J.N. Parker, D. Conz, D. Rhoten, and A. Parker. 2008. Ecology transformed: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis and the changing patterns of ecological research. Pp. 277-296 in Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, G.M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, and N. Bos, eds. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

Hajkowicz, S., and K. Collins. 2007. A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour. Manage. 21(9):1553-1566.

Hampton, S.E., and J.N. Parker. 2011. Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. BioScience 61(11):900-910.

Harrington, W., L. Heinzerling, and R. Morgenstern, eds. 2009. Reforming Regulatory Impact Analysis. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future [online]. Available: http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF.RIA.V4.low_res.pdf [accessed Apr. 11, 2012].

Heinz Center (The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment). 2002. The State of the Nation’s Ecosystems: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Heinz Center (The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment). 2008. The State of the Nation’s Ecosystems 2008: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Hellerstein, D., and S. Malcolm. 2011. The Influence of Rising Commodity Prices on the Conservation Reserve Program. Economic Research Report No. 110, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Services [online]. Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/ERR110/ERR110.pdf [accessed Apr. 9, 2012].

Humbert, S., J.D. Marshall, S. Shaked, J.V. Spadaro, Y. Nishioka, P. Preiss, T.E. McKone, A. Horvath, and O. Jolliet. 2011. Intake fraction for particulate matter: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45(11):4808-4816.

InnoCentive. 2012. What We Do [online]. Available: http://www.innocentive.com/about-innocentive [accessed Apr. 16, 2012].

Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell, and R.N. Stavins. 2002. Environmental policy and technological change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 22(1-2):41-69.

Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell, and R.N. Stavins. 2005. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 54(2-3):164-174.

Kalil, T. 2006. Prizes for Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution [online]. Available: http://www.brookings.edu/views/papers/200612kalil.pdf [accessed Aug. 2, 2012].

Kasprzyk, J.R., P.M. Reed, B.R. Kirsch, and G. W. Characklis.2009. Managing population and drought risks using many-objective water portfolio planning under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res. 45: W12401, doi:10.1029/2009WR008121.

Khosla, V. 2008. Biofuels: Clarifying assumptions. Science 322(5900):371-374.

Kline, K.L., and V.H. Dale. 2008. Biofuels: Effects on land and fire. Science 321 (5886):199-201.

Kuminoff, N., V.K. Smith, and C. Timmins. 2010. The New Economics of Equilibrium Sorting and its Transformational Role for Policy Evaluation. NBER Working Paper No. 16349. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA [online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w16349.pdf [accessed Apr. 2, 2012].



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement