National Academies Press: OpenBook

Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations (2012)

Chapter: Appendix B Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People

« Previous: Appendix A Biographical Sketches of the Panel for Review of Best Practices In Research and Development Organizations
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People." National Research Council. 2012. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13529.
×

Appendix B

Importance of Alignment Between an Organization’s Vision and Its People

At a National Research Council workshop on best practices in assessment of research and development organizations (a data-gathering workshop conducted under the auspices of the Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations) on March 19, 2012, Dr. John Sommerer, Head, Space Sector, and Johns Hopkins University Gilman Scholar, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, highlighted the importance of assessing the alignment between an organization’s vision and its people. The following is taken from the summary of his presentation titled “Assessing R&D Organizations: Perspectives on a Venn Diagram,” provided in the NRC workshop summary.1

Alignment between an organization’s vision and its people is addressed by asking the following questions, and any assessment, even of technical quality, needs this context: Does the parent stakeholder have a strategy articulated with clear milestones so that it can be internalized by the organization? Does the organization have a supportive strategy? Is there a clearly articulated vision of what the parent/organization is trying to achieve according to some milestones? Are all of these elements in synchrony? Are these strategies mutually supportive and updated? Are they good or bad strategies? Within this alignment, is the organization looking for first-mover advantages or second-mover advantages? What developments does the organization consider important to capture?

Vision is addressed by asking the following questions: Does the organization know what it wants to become (in 1-, 5-, 10-year frameworks)? What expertise is it trying to achieve? Acknowledging that strategy is about what one is going to do and not do, where does the organization choose to be a leader as opposed to a follower of fast developments? Does the organization have expertise in areas in which it desires to be a leader, and less in areas in which it desires to be a follower? Are the synergies nurtured? Are there exit strategies? Are there realistic stretch goals? Are there sufficient resources? A vision without resources is a hallucination.

The component of people is addressed by the following considerations: Human capital is fundamental. Innovation requires free energy—that is, giving researchers some latitude and discretion in their work. There is no hope for the future of an organization without free energy. Peer reviews, which measure competence, have been well defined, but it is more difficult to measure motivation and external engagement. There is a need for external engagement globally in order to innovate. An assessment of human capital includes asking: Are the people in the organization trying to become better?

The intersection of people with alignment is addressed by the following questions: Do the people know the strategy of the organization and its parent? Are there mechanisms by which the people can contribute to the strategy? Can they interact with the organization’s customers? Are the leaders administrators or role models? What are their credentials and qualifications? Do they have a strategy to support the people? Does the organization assess and mentor the people? Does

____________________________

1 National Research Council, 2012. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations—Summary of a Workshop. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People." National Research Council. 2012. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13529.
×

the organization have the will to release people who should not be there? Does the organization have a strategy and the resources for engagement with the external world and for encouraging such engagement? Is innovation welcomed, supported, protected? External engagement must be focused on the broad global community.

The intersection of vision with alignment is addressed by the following questions: Is there updating of the vision in response to changing external factors? Is there a process of self-assessment? Is there a list of lessons learned, and are they really learned, not just recorded? Is the self-assessment diligent, and does it have integrity? Is the assessment updated in acknowledgment of new strategies? There is need for both bottom-up and top-down assessment.

The intersection of people with vision is addressed by the following questions: Do the people know the vision? Can the people contribute to the vision? Does the R&D organization have a strategy and appropriate resources for engagement with the larger technical community, the commercial sector, and the global community? Is innovation welcomed, supported, and protected?

The intersection of vision, people, and alignment is addressed by examination of the organization’s agility, flexibility, and adaptability in the face of changing pressures, budgets, and external contexts. This intersection needs to be consciously worked by staff and leadership, and it must be internalized.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People." National Research Council. 2012. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13529.
×
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Importance of Alignment Between an Organization's Vision and Its People." National Research Council. 2012. Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13529.
×
Page 53
Next: Appendix C Validating the Assessment »
Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $37.00 Buy Ebook | $29.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Research and development (R&D) organizations are operated by government, business, academe, and independent institutes. The success of their parent organizations is closely tied to the success of these R&D organizations. In this report, organizations refers to an organization that performs research and/or development activities (often a laboratory), and parent refers to the superordinate organization of which the R&D organization is a part. When the organization under discussion is formally labeled a laboratory, it is referred to as such. The question arises: How does one know whether an organization and its programs are achieving excellence in the best interests of its parent? Does the organization have an appropriate research staff, facilities, and equipment? Is it doing the right things at high levels of quality, relevance, and timeliness? Does it lead to successful new concepts, products, or processes that support the interests of its parent?

This report offers assessment guidelines for senior management of organizations and of their parents. The report lists the major principles of assessment, noting that details will vary from one organization to another. It provides sufficient information to inform the design of assessments, but it does not prescribe precisely how to perform them, because different techniques are needed for different types of organizations.

Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations covers three key factors that underpin the success of an R&D organization: (1) the mission of the organization and its alignment with that of the parents; (2) the relevance and impact of the organization's work; and (3) the resources provided to the organization, beginning with a high-quality staff and management.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!