National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Subjective Well-Being Module of the American Time Use Survey: Assessment for Its Continuation (2012)
Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Citation Manager

. "References." The Subjective Well-Being Module of the American Time Use Survey: Assessment for Its Continuation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
18
bottomleft bottomright
Page
18

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 18
References Aguiar, M., and Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969­1006, 1008. Archer, M., Paleti, R., Konduri, K., and Pendyala, R. (2012). "Modeling the connection Between Activity-Travel Patterns and Subjective Well-Being. Submitted for Presentation and Publication, 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Boeham, J.K., and Kubzansky, L.D. (2012). The Heart's Content: The Association between Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Health." Psychological Bulletin, online April 17, 2012. Available: http://www.rwjf.org/pioneer/product.jsp?id=73919 (accessed September 7, 2012). Christodoulou, C., Schneider, S., and Stone, A. (2012). Validation of a Brief Yesterday Measure of Hedonic Well-Being and Daily Activities: Comparison with the Day Reconstruction Method. Working Paper, June 4. Deaton, A.S. (2011). The Financial Crisis and the Well-Being of Americans. NBER Working Papers 17128. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w17128 (accessed July 29, 2012). Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151­157. Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., and Arora, R. (2009). Income's Differential Influence on Judgments of Life Versus Affective Wellbeing. Assessing Wellbeing. Oxford, UK: Springer. Huppert, F.A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and WellBeing, 1, 137­164. Kahneman, D., and Deaton, A. (2010, August). High Income Improves Evaluation of Life but not Emotional Well-Being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. Krueger, A.B., and Mueller, A. (2012). Time use, emotional well-being and unemployment: Evidence from longitudinal data. American Economic Review, 102(3), 594­599. Krueger, A.B., and Stone, A.A. (2008). Assessment of pain: A community-based diary survey in the USA. Lancet, 371(May 3), 1519­1525. Meyer, B.D., and Sullivan, J.X. (2009). Economic Well-Being and Time Use. Working paper, June 22. Steg, L., and Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59­69. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available: http://www.stiglitz-sen- fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf (accessed August 2, 2012). 18