Access Rights (2005)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

42 1. Clay, L.D., A Ten-Year National Highway Program: A Report to the President, Washington, D.C., 1955. 2. Netherton, R.D., Control of Highway Access, The Uni- versity of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1963. 3. NCHRP Legal Research Digest 44: Reexamination of the Line Between Governmental Exercise of the Police Power and Eminent Domain, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, 64 pp. 4. Nichols on Eminent Domain, 3rd ed., Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1976. 5. NCHRP Research Results Digest 165: Legal Techniques for Reserving Right-of-Way for Future Projects Includ- ing Corridor Protection, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, 44 pp. 6. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets—2001, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2001, 947 pp. 7. Selected Transportation Laws, 2001–2002 ed., Chapter 374, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem. 8. Erbe, N.A., “A Review and Some New Thinking on Control of Highway Access,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 232, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1959, pp. 49–78. 9. Access Management Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, 387 pp. 10. Pennsylvania Coal Company v. Mahon, 160 U.S. 393, 1922. 11. Meltz, R., D.H. Merriam, and R.M. Frank, The Taking Issue: Constitutional Limits on Land Use Control and Environmental Regulation, Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1999, 595 pp. 12. Williams, K.M. and J.R. Forester, NCHRP Synthesis 233: Land Development Regulations That Promote Access Management, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, 45 pp. 13. Lewis, H., Highway Research Special Report 76: The Future of Abutters’ Rights: Access, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1962, pp. 163–178. 14. Williams v. Highway Commission, 252 N.C. 772, 114 S.E. 2d 782, 1960. 15. Corridor Preservation: Case Studies and Analysis Fac- tors in Decision-Making, Report FHWA-PD-96-044, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1996, 216 pp. 16. Access Control Policy to the Highway System, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, Nov. 2002. 17. A Policy on Design Standards—Interstate System, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., July 1991, 14 pp. 18. Butorac, M.A. and J.C. Wen, NCHRP Synthesis 332: Access Management on Crossroads in the Vicinity of Interchanges, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, 82 pp. 19. Moser, L.C., “Methods Used to Protect, Reserve, and Acquire Rights-of-Way for Future Use in Maryland,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 77, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., Nov. 1953, pp. 51–59. 20. Carlson, R.F., “Where Does Police Power End and Emi- nent Domain Begin?” Selected Studies in Highway Law, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, Vol. 1, pp. 1–23. 21. Feifarek, A., “Administration of Highway Protection Laws,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 140, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1956, pp. 72–75. 22. Bowman, D.L. and C.C. Rushing, Access Management: Transportation Policy Considerations for a Growing Virginia, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Virginia Department of Transportation, Charlottesville, Nov. 1998, 88 pp. 23. City of Phoenix v. Wade, 5 Ariz. App. 505, 428 P.2d 450, 453 (1967). 24. Koepke, F.J. and H.S. Levinson, NCHRP Report 348: Access Management Guidelines for Activity Centers, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1956, pp. 72–75. 25. State of Minnesota, Minnesota Statutes 2003, Statute 161.43, 2003. 26. Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, PL 105- 178, Sec. 1303, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1998. 27. Netherton, R.D., “A Summary and Reappraisal of Access Control,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 345, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1962, pp. 1–14. 28. Colorado Revised Statutes 43-2-147, Jan. 1995. REFERENCES