Access Rights (2005)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

43 Bartelsmeyer, R.R., Highway Research Board Special Report 76: Highway Laws Research, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1962, pp. 1–4. “Constitutional Law Fifth Amendment Eminent Domain Clause—Compensation for Partial Regulatory Takings,” Tennessee Law Review, Winter 1995, pp. 403–424. Dunbar, D.W., “An Attorney General Looks at Highway Law,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 237, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1960, pp. 8–15. Feifarek, A., “Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Highway Access Control,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 345, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1962, pp. 21–26. Frierson, M., “Michigan DOTs Policies and Practices Regard- ing Appraisal and Appraisal Reviews for Condemnation Lit- igation,” Proceedings of the 1997 AASHTO/FHWA Right of Way Conference, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Federal Highway Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 68–71. Hattan, D.E., T.S. Frisbie, R.W. Felsburg, and J.R. Kullman, US 85 Access Control Plan, ITE 2001 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Chicago, Ill., Aug. 19–22, 2001, 13 pp. Kockelman, K.M., et al., “Frontage Roads: Assessment of Legal Issues, Design, Decisions, Costs, Operations, and Land-Development Differences,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 3, May 2003, pp. 242–252. Kockelman, K.M., et al., Frontage Roads in Texas: A Com- prehensive Assessment, FHWA/TX-0-1873-2, University of Texas, Austin; Texas Department of Transportation, Austin; Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2001, 192 pp. Lindas, L.I., “Conveyancing Techniques for Acquisition of Access Rights,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 345, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1962, pp. 26–32. Mandelker, D. and B.W. Baessler, Corridor Preservation Study of Legal and Institutional Barriers, Report FHWA- PD-96-045, Federal Highway Administration, Washing- ton, D.C., 1995, 194 pp. Morrow, H., “Constitutional and Case Law Principles Guid- ing Access Control: Access Modifications in Projects and Project Related Eminent Domain Proceedings,” First National Access Management Conference, Colorado Department of Transportation, Transportation Research Board, Federal Highway Administration, 1993, pp. 35–37. Munro, J., “Valuation of Access Rights,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 345, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1962, pp. 33–34. Nissel, S.N., “Control of Access and Police Power,” High- way Research Board Bulletin 205, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1958, pp. 29–34. Powers, L., “Regulation of Access vs. Control of Access in Oklahoma,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 140, High- way Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 1956, pp. 55–59. Richardson, M., “The Role of the Public Trust Doctrine in Eminent Domain Decisions,” Detroit College of Law Review, Spring 1995, pp. 58–68. Rose, D., J. Gluck, P. Demosthenes, B. Koepke, H. Levin- son, and R. Armour, Review of SDDOT’s Highway Access Control Process, SD99-01-F, Final Report, Dye Manage- ment Group, Inc., South Dakota Department of Trans- portation, Pierre, Feb. 2000, 214 pp. Saito, M., D.A. Thomas, R.S. Payne, and G.J. Thurgood, “Utah’s Legal Framework for Corridor Preservation Activities,” Transportation Research Record 1706, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 29–37. Scheib, D., Access Management in Maryland, Third National Access Management Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., Oct. 4–7, 2000, pp. 227–230. Stanhagen, W.H. and J.J. Mullins, “Application of Police Power and Planning Controls to Arterial Streets,” High- way Research Board Bulletin 271, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1960, pp. 14–28. Thomas, L., “Legal Implications of Control of Access to Uncontrolled-Access Highways,” Selected Studies in Highway Law, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1979, Vol. 2, 38 pp. Towcimak, K.M., “Management of the Appraisal Process in a High Volume Eminent Domain Litigation Environ- ment,” Proceedings of the 1997 AASHTO/FHWA Right of Way Conference, New Orleans, La., May 12–15, 1997, pp. 62–67. Vance, J.C., “Rights of Abutting Property Owner Upon Conversation of Uncontrolled-Access Road into Limited-Access Highway,” Selected Studies in Highway Law, Vol. 2, Transportation Research Board, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, 23 pp. Wagner, T., “Business Relocation and Reestablishments in Wisconsin,” Proceedings of the 1997 AASHTO/FHWA Right of Way Conference, New Orleans, La., May 12–15, 1997, pp. 100–101. Williams, K.M., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 304: Driveway Regulation Practices, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 83. Websites www.accessmanagement.gov www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/access_mgmt BIBLIOGRAPHY