Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
85 1. Levinson, H.S., W.F. Hoey, D.B. Sanders and F.H. Wynn, NCHRP Report 143: Bus Use of HighwaysâState of the Art, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1973. 2. Levinson, H.S., C.L. Adams, and W.F. Hoey, NCHRP Report 155: Bus Use of HighwaysâPlanning and Design Guidelines, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1975. 3. Danaher, A., P. Ryus, and M. Walker, TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 4. Levinson, H.S., et al., TCRP Report 90: Bus Rapid Tran- sit Volume 2: Implementation Guidelines, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 5. Danaher, A., K. Blume, H.S. Levinson. S. Zimmerman, TCRP Report 118: Bus Rapid Transit Practitionerâs Guide, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. 6. BRT Guideways GuidelinesâFinal Draft, APTA BRT Standards Working Group, American Public Transit Asso- ciation, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2009. 7. Viegas, J., R. Roque, B. Lu, and J. Viera, âThe Intermittent Bus Lane System: Demonstration in Lisbon,â TRB 2007 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. 8. Fitzpatrick, K., K.M. Hall, and S. Farnswarth, TCRP Report 65: Evaluation of Bus Bulbs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 2001. 9. Zimmerman, S., H.S. Levinson, and S. Rutherford, TCRP Report 90: Bus Rapid TransitâVolume 1: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. 10. Wilbur Smith and Associates, Sverdrup and Parcel and Associates, Inc., Stanford Research Institute, GCA Technology Division, Wyle Laboratories, Bus Rapid Transit Options for Densely Developed Areas, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1975. 11. Vuchic, V., âBus Semi-Rapid Transit Mode Develop- ment and Evaluation,â Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, pp. 71â95. 12. Cherry, C., E. Deakin, N. Higgins, and S.B. Huey, âToward a Systems Level Approach to Sustainable Urban Arterial Revitalization: A Case Study of San Pablo Avenue,â 2006 TRB Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., 2006. 13. Jarzab, J.T., J. Lightbody, and E. Maeda, âCharacteristics of Bus Rapid Transit Projects: An Overview,â Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, pp. 31â46. 14. Blume, K., A. Danaher, B. Ball, and J. Rey, âTransit Cor- ridor Evaluation and Prioritization Framework,â TRB 2005 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005. 15. Korve, H., H.S. Levinson, and T. Chira-Chavala, TCRP Report 17: Integration of Light Rail Transit into City Streets, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. 16. St. Jacques, K. and H.S. Levinson, TCRP Report 26: Operational Analysis of Bus Lanes on Arterials, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 17. St. Jacques, K. and H.S. Levinson, TCRP Research Results Digest 38: Operational Analysis of Bus Lanes on Arterials: Application and Refinement, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Sep. 2000. 18. TCRP Web Document 6: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006. 19. TRB Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service, Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 20. Mesbah, M., M. Sarvi, and G. Currie, âA New Method- ology for Optimizing Transit Priority at the Network Level,â TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 21. Baker, R., J. Collura, J. Dale, J. Greenough, L. Head, B. Hemily, M. Ivanovic, J. Jarzab, D. McCormick, J. Obenberger, L. Smith, and G. Stoppenhagen, âOverview of Transit Signal Priority,â ITS America, Washington, D.C., 2002. 22. Collura, J., K. Vlachou, and A. Mermelstein, Improving Transportation Mobility, Safety, and Efficiency: Guide- lines for Planning and Deploying Traffic Signal Priority Strategies, prepared for the Vermont Agency of Trans- portation, May 25, 2007. 23. Wang, Y., M. Hallenbeck, J. Zheng, G. Zhang, X.M. Ma, and J. Corey, Comprehensive Evaluation of Tran- sit Signal Priority System Impacts Using Field Observed Traffic Data, Department of Civil Engineer- ing, University of Washington, Seattle, June 2008 24. Curie, G. and A. Shalaby, âActive Transit Signal Priority for StreetcarsâExperience in Melbourne and Toronto,â TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 25. Dion, F., H. Rakha, and Y. Zhang, âEvaluation of Transit Signal Priority Benefits Along a Fixed-Time Signal- ized Arterial,â TRB 2002 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, REFERENCES
86 Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2002. 26. Chada, S., âCritical Factors Affecting Transit Signal Prior- ity,â TRB 2004 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. 27. Mucsu, K., The Tale of Seven Queue Jumps, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2007. 28. Zhou, G., A. Gan, D. Lue, and D. Shen, âDesign of Transit Signal Priority at Intersections with Queue Jumper Lanes,â TRB 2008 Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C., Nov. 2007. 29. Texas Transportation Institute, TCRP Report 19: Guide- lines for the Design and Location of Bus Stops, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, 15 pp. 30. DKS Associates, âKing County Route 5 Evaluationâ Work Order No. 3,â prepared for King County Transit Speed & Reliability Program, Seattle, Wash., Sep. 13, 2005. 31. Danaher, A. and C. Braud, JTA ITS Signal Priority Pro- gram StudyâFinal Report, Dec. 2007. 32. Hinebaugh, D. and R. Diaz, Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making, National BRT Institute, Tampa, Fla., Feb. 2009. 33. El-Geneidy, A.M., J. Strathman, T. Kimpel, and D. Crout, âThe Effects of Bus Stop Consolidation on Passenger Activity and Transit Operations,â 2006 TRB Annual Meet- ing CD, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. 34. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 1985â 88 Preferential Streets Program Final Report, 1988.