Freight Transportation Surveys (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

66 REFERENCES 1. Victoria, I., and M. Walton, Freight Data Needs at the Metropolitan Level and the Suitability of Intelligent Transportation Systems in Supplying MPOs with the Needed Freight Data, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, 2004. 2. Allen, J., and M. Browne, Review of Survey Techniques Used in Urban Freight Studies, University of Westmin- ster, London, U.K., 2008. 3. U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency, Travel Survey Manual, Travel Model Improvement Program, Washington, D.C., July 1, 1996. 4. Statewide Truck Lanes Needs Identification Study, Tech- nical Memorandum 1: Data Collection, HNTB Corpora- tion, Cambridge Systematics Inc., and GeoStats, LP for Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, 2007. 5. Port of Portland and Oregon Department of Transporta- tion, Roadside Intercept Survey, Cambridge Systematics, Cambridge, Mass., Sep. 8, 2005. 6. Ahanotu, D., and A. Mani, Freight Data Synthesis, Report No. CDOT-2008-3, Final Report, Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 2008. 7. Port of Portland and Oregon Department of Transporta- tion, Roadside Intercept Survey, Cambridge Systematics, Sep. 8, 2005. 8. Port of Portland and Oregon Department of Transporta- tion, Task 4—Gate and Establishment Survey Plan Mem- orandum, Cambridge Systematics, Cambridge, Mass., Sep. 16, 2005. 9. Jessup, E.W., K.L.W. Casavant, and C.U. Lawson, “Truck Trip Data Collection Methods,” Oregon Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, Salem, 2004. 10. Special Report 276—A Concept for a National Freight Data Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, 114 pp. 11. Hancock, K.L., Freight Demand Modeling, Tools for Public-Sector Decision Making, Summary of a Confer- ence, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Sep. 27, 2006. 12. Harrison, R., N. Hutson, J. West, and J. Wilkie, Charac- teristics of Drayage Operations at the Port of Houston, Report SWUTC/08/473700-00075-1, Southwest Region University Transportation Center, University of Texas at Austin, 2008, 28 pp. 13. Meyer, M.A.I., Port of Los Angeles Baseline Transporta- tion Study, Port of Los Angeles, Calif., 2004, p. 19. 14. Washington Transportation Plan Update Freight Move- ment, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2008. 15. Austin Area Freight Transportation Study, MACTEC Engineering & Consulting Inc., and Alliance Transporta- tion Group, Inc., Alpharetta, Ga., 2008. 16. Arellano Associates et al., Multi-County Goods Move- ment Action Plan: Technical Memorandum 2b: Public Outreach—Survey No. 2 Report, Arellano Associates, Chino, Calif., 2008. 17. Arizona Multimodal Freight Analysis Study, Technical Memorandum #1, Analysis of Arizona’s Freight Depen- dent Industries, Wilbur Smith Associates, 2007. 18. Kansas Statewide Freight Plan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 2008. 19. Virginia Statewide Multimodal Freight Study, Phase I, Interview Summaries, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 2009. 20. Wilbur Smith Associates et al., Atlanta Regional Freight Mobility Plan Final Report, Wilbur Smith Associates, 2008. 21. Multi-County Goods Movement Action Plan; Technical Memorandum 2a: Stakeholder Opinion Survey of Goods Movement Issues, Arellano Associates, Chino, Calif., Apr. 30, 2008. 22. Enhancing Consideration of Freight in Regional Trans- portation Planning—Final Report, Cambridge Systemat- ics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 2007. 23. Short, J., Survey of Motor Carrier Opinions on Potential Optional Truck Only Toll (TOT) Lanes on Atlanta Inter- state Highways, CD-ROM, 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 21–25, 2007. 24. Huang, Y.-H., M. Roetting, J.R. McDevitt, D. Melton, and G.S. Smith, “Feedback by Technology: Attitudes and Opinions of Truck Drivers,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, Vol. 8, Nos. 4–5, 2005, pp. 277–297. 25. Ko, B., S.S. Washburn, and D.S. McLeod, “Performance Measures for Truck Level-of-Service: An Exploratory Survey Analysis,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2130, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 120–128.

67 26. Washington State Truck Parking Survey Summary Report, PRR, Inc., Seattle, Wash., Apr. 4, 2008. 27. Moore, D., and J.Y. Wang, 2008 Economic Impact of I-5 and I-90 Highway Closures on Shipping, Freight, and Trucking Businesses, Data Report 08-016, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, 2008. 28. Ohio Department of Transportation, 2003–2004 Ohio Statewide General Establishment Survey, Technical Memorandum, NuStats, Austin, Tex., 2004. 29. Department for Transport, Review of Road Freight Sta- tistics—National Statistics Quality Review Series, Report No. 30, United Kingdom Department for Transport, Lon- don, 2004. 30. Department for Transport, “Guidance Notes on Com- pleting the Continuing Survey of Road Goods Transport (GB) Questionnaire,” United Kingdom Department for Transport, London, 2008. 31. Surveys and Methodology: National Survey of Transport of Goods by Road, Central Statistics Office Ireland, Dub- lin, May 10, 2009. 32. National Survey of Transport of Goods by Roads, Cen- tral Statistics Office, Cork, Ireland, May 10, 2009, p. 1. 33. National Survey of Transport of Goods by Roads, Cen- tral Statistics Office, Cork, Ireland, May 10, 2009, p. 2. 34. National Survey of Transport of Goods by Roads, Cen- tral Statistics Office, Cork, Ireland, May 10, 2009, p. 3. 35. Allen, J., G. Tanner, M. Browne, S. Anderson, G. Christ- odoulou, and P. Jones, Modelling Policy Measures and Company Initiatives for Sustainable Urban Distribu- tion—Final Technical Report, Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster, London, 2003. 36. Ahanotu, D.M.A., Freight Data Synthesis, Report No. CDOT-2008-3, Final Report, Colorado Department of Transportation, Boulder, 2008. 37. Hunt, J.D., K. Stefan, A.T. Brownlee, J.D.P. McMillan, A. Farhan, K. Tsang, D. Atkins, and M. Ishani, A Commer- cial Movement Modelling Strategy for Alberta’s Major Cities, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2004. 38. Hunt, J.D., A.T. Brownlee, and M. Ishani, Edmonton Commercial Movements Study, Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Woodstock, ON, Canada, 2004. 39. 2000 Commodity Flow Survey Report, International Results Group, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2001. 40. Subregional Freight Movement Truck Access Study— Final Report, Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc., Santa Ana, Calif., 2004. 41. Wilbur Smith Associates, Global Insight, Georgia Insti- tute of Technology, Street Smarts, Atlanta Regional Freight Mobility Plan, Atlanta Regional Commission, Freight Mobility Plan, Feb. 2008, 119 pp. 42. Mani, A., and J. Prozzi, “State of the Practice in Freight Data: A Review of Available Freight Data in the U.S.,” Center for Transportation Research, Austin, Tex., 2004. 43. Special Report 277: Measuring Personal Travel and Goods Movement—A Review of the Bureau of Transpor- tation Statistics’ Surveys, National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, 133 pp. 44. 2007 Commodity Flow Survey, Survey Overview and Methodology, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Wash- ington, D.C., 2009. 45. Southworth, F., A Preliminary Roadmap for the Ameri- can Freight Data Program, Draft, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn., 2004. 46. Transportation Research Circular E-C119: North Amer- ican Freight Transportation Data Workshop, K. Han- cock, Ed., Transportation Research Board Freight Transportation Data Committee and International Trade and Transportation Committee, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, 62 pp. 47. Allen, J., and M. Browne, Survey Forms Used in Urban Freight Studies, University of Westminster, London, 2008. 48. Jensen, M., M. Williamson, R. Sanchez, A. Newton, C. Mitchell, and M. Hallenbeck, WSDOT Intermodal Data Linkages Freight ITS Operational Test Evaluation—Fi- nal Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, Wash- ington, D.C., 2003. 49. Jones, C., D. Murray, and J. Short, Methods of Travel Time Measurement in Freight-Significant Corridors, CD-ROM, Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 9–13, 2005. 50. McCormack, E.H., and M.E. Hallenbeck, “ITS Devices Used to Collect Truck Data for Performance Bench- marks,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1957, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C., 2006, pp. 43–50. 51. Srour, F.J., and D. Newton, “Freight-Specific Data Derived from Intelligent Transportation Systems: Poten- tial Uses in Planning Freight Transportation Systems,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 1957, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 66–74.

68 52. Roorda, M., S. McCabe, and H. Kwan, A Shipper-Based Survey of Goods and Service Movements in the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH)—Report I: Survey Design and Implementation, Ministry of Transportation—Trans- portation Planning Section and Region of Peel, Bramp- ton, ON, Canada, Sep. 14, 2007. 53. Starcrest Consulting Group LLC, “Draft Methodology for Estimating Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Activity at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach,” The Port of Long Beach and the Port of Los Angeles, Calif., 2006. 54. Fischer, M.J.C., and M.J. Han, NCHRP Synthesis 298: Truck Trip Generation Data, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001. 55. Allen, J.U., M.U. Browne, T.U. Cherrett, and F.U. McLeod, Review of UK Urban Freight Studies, Univer- sity of Westminster and University of Southampton, United Kingdom, 2008. 56. Casavant, K., and E. Jessup, Development of a Washing- ton State Freight Data System, Washington State Depart- ment of Transportation, Olympia, 2007. 57. Browne, M., J. Allen, S. Anderson, and A. Woodburn, “Night-Time Delivery Restrictions: A Review,” Recent Advances in City Logistics. The 4th International Confer- ence on City Logistics, E. Tanaiguchi and R.G. Thomp- son, Eds., Langkawi, Malaysia, July 12–14, 2005, Elsevier, Kidington, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2006, pp. 269–281. 58. Patier, D., and Routhier, J.-L. Best Urban Freight Solu- tions II; D 3.2. BESTUFS Best Practice in Data Collec- tion, Modeling Approaches and Application Fields for Urban Commercial Transport. University of Lyon, Aug. 31, 2008.