National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 88: Strollers, Carts, and Other Large Items on Buses and Trains (2011)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Murray, Gail, Goldman, Joey M, Transportation Research Board. "Agency Operations." TCRP Synthesis 88: Strollers, Carts, and Other Large Items on Buses and Trains. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
11
bottomleft bottomright
Page
11
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
Methodology (5-5)
Organization of Report (6-6)
CHAPTER TWO - Characteristics of Surveyed Transit Agencies (7-10)
Agency Operations (11-15)
Literature Review on Wheelchairs and Wheelchair Accommodation Policies (16-17)
Survey Results (18-20)
One Agency's Experience: TriMet, Portland, Oregon - Revisiting Wheelchair Policies (21-22)
Literature Review on Segways, Scooters, and Other Mobility Devices and Accommodation Policies (23-23)
Survey Results (24-27)
One Agency's Experience: Metro Transit, Madison, Wisconsin - Learning Safe Operation of a Segway from a User (28-29)
Literature Review on Strollers and Stroller Accommodation Policies (30-32)
Survey Results (33-35)
One Agency's Experience: Tri Delta Transit, Antioch, California - Creating Space on Buses for Strollers (36-37)
Literature Review on Bicycles and Bicycle Accommodation Policies (38-40)
One Agency's Experience: King County Metro, Seattle - Three-Position Bike Racks (41-41)
Survey Results (42-45)
One Agency's Experience: BART, San Francisco Bay Area - Innovations for Bicycle Access on Rail (46-47)
Literature Review on Luggage, Carts, and Other Large Items and Accommodation Policies (48-49)
Survey Results (50-52)
One Agency's Experience: RoadRUNNER Transit, Las Cruces, New Mexico - A Different Way to Define Large Items (53-53)
General Large Items and Transport Aids (Strollers, Bicycles, Luggage, etc.) on Paratransit (54-54)
Other Large Items (55-56)
One Agency's Experience: Marble Valley Regional Transit District, Rutland, Vermont - Accommodating Skis and Snowboards, Suitcases and Pets (57-57)
Literature Review on Vehicle Design (58-59)
Survey Results (60-61)
Survey Responses (62-68)
One Agency's Experience: OC Transpo, Ottawa, Ontario - Developing, Refining, and Enforcing Policies, and Public Outcry (69-70)
Strollers (71-71)
Carts, Parcels, and Other Items (72-73)
REFERENCES (74-76)
APPENDIX A - Survey Questionnaire (77-122)
APPENDIX B - List of Participating Agencies (123-124)
APPENDIX C - Summary Tables of Agency Policies (125-132)
APPENDIX D - Sample Policies (133-164)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 11
11 Table 1 continued from p. 10 San Francisco Bay 93 833,762 8,965 Rail 540 115,227,684 · · · · · · · · · Area Rapid Transit District (BART) Oakland, California OC Transpo 170.5 784,725 4,602 Bus 845 · · · · · · · · Ottawa, Ontario Rail 2 Paratransit 91 Total 938 Southeastern Penn- 832 3,300,407 3,967 Bus 1,172 183,574,756 · · · · · · · · · · · sylvania Transporta- Rail 720 155,593,575 tion Authority (SEPTA) Paratransit 345 1,773,845 Philadelphia, Penn. Total 2,237 340,942,176 TriMet 574 1,466,540 2,555 Bus 532 64,114,973 · · · · · · Portland, Oregon Rail 85 6,875,263 Paratransit 272 7,847,149 Total 889 104,168,660 Utah Transit Author- 1,412 1,744,417 1,235 Bus 371 23,395,624 · · · · · · ity (UTA) Rail 64 16,182,145 Salt Lake City, Utah Paratransit 150 478,242 Total 585 40,056,011 Washington Metro- 692 1,305,693 1,887 Bus 1,285 135,484,298 · · · · politan Area Transit Rail 830 288,039,725 Authority (WMATA) Paratransit 452 1,712,709 Washington, District Total 2,567 425,236,560 of Columbia Sources: U.S. Census, National Transit Database, Canadian Urban Transit Association. Note: All data from 2008 except for the following agencies: Las Vegas Monorail Company (2007), Sun Tran (2007), Pullman Transit (2007), Riverbend Transit (2006/2008), BC Transit (2007), Miami-Dade Transit (2007). AGENCY POLICIES AGENCY OPERATIONS Many of the agencies surveyed have policies regarding Surveyed agencies operate rail only, buses only, or a combi- bringing large items on board buses and trains. The major- nation of services, as shown in Figure 3 (n = 42). ity of agencies (33 of 42, or 78%) have policies regarding wheelchairs on transit, followed by strollers (30 of 42, or 71%). Policies regarding bringing bicycles on vehicles are in place at only 13 of the agencies surveyed (31%). Although all of the agencies that offer paratransit service have policies in place regarding the transport of wheelchairs, and nearly all (29 of 36, or 91%) have policies regarding accommodation of mobility devices (including scooters and, FIGURE 3 Surveyed agencies by type of operation. in some cases, Segways), only one-third of the agencies have policies regarding luggage, carts, and parcels. Only nine agen- Bus Services cies (28%) have policies in place regarding the transport of strollers on paratransit, some of which allow for strollers and Of the 40 agencies surveyed that operate buses (including some of which prohibit them. These policies are discussed in those that operate buses in addition to rail), 39 (98%) offer subsequent chapters and a summary table that highlights ele- local, regular fixed-route bus service. A large group of those ments of all agency policies is included in Appendix C. surveyed (16 of 40, or 40%) offer express or commuter bus

OCR for page 12
12 services. Of these 16 agencies, 14 (88%) are operated by fleet of vehicles. Many offer both low-floor and high-floor either medium- or large-sized agencies. Only a few offer bus buses. Only 11 of 39 agencies (28%) operated only one kind rapid transit (BRT) services in dedicated rights-of-way (six of vehicle. Overall, 35 of 39 responding agencies operate low- of 40, or 15%). floor buses (90%) and 33 operate high-floor buses (85%). Of 40 responding transit agencies, 32 (80%) operate para- Rail Services transit vehicles (Table 2). BART noted that agency staff "do not directly operate paratransit" but "do so through contrac- Sixteen agencies offer some sort of rail service. Although two tors." Similarly, Miami­Dade and Metro Ride noted that agencies operate only rail, the other 14 also offer bus service. they have affiliated service. Although they do not operate paratransit directly, a couple of other agencies included para- It is generally difficult to make wide conclusions from transit vehicles in the information about their fleet. (and about) these data, other than acknowledging the great variety among the 16 rail-operating agencies. Nearly a third TABLE 2 of them (five of 16 agencies) offer more than one mode of DOES YOUR AGENCY OPERATE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES? rail. Additionally, a majority feature platform-level entry Yes 32 (80%) trains (80%). One-half of the agencies (eight of 16) operate 8 (20%) heavy rail service. The survey group includes one monorail No operator in Las Vegas, as well as one agency, Capital Metro n = 40. in Austin, that operates freight service in addition to start-up commuter rail. Table 3 summarizes the types of buses and Bus Features rail cars operated by surveyed agencies. With regard to regular bus service (regular, local bus service, commuter buses, and BRT), agencies generally have a diverse

OCR for page 13
TABLE 3 TYPES OF BUSES AND RAIL CARS OPERATED BY SURVEYED AGENCIES Agency Name Types of Buses and Services Height of Vehicle Types of Rail Service Height of Vehicle Interior Floor Interior Floor Local Express/ BRT Paratransit Low-floor High- Commuter Heavy Light Streetcar, Platform- Low-floor High- bus commuter (dedicated (boarding) floor rail rail rail trolley level (boarding) floor service buses right-of- buses buses or other entry trains trains way) fixed rail trains service Small Brandon Transit · · · · Brandon, Manitoba Downeast Transportation, Inc. · · · Ellsworth, Maine Greater Glens Falls Transit · · · · Glens Falls, New York Macatawa Area Express Transportation Authority (MAX) · · · · Holland, Michigan City of Las Cruces RoadRUNNER Transit · · · · Las Cruces, New Mexico Las Vegas Monorail Company · · Las Vegas, Nevada The T · · · Lawrence, Kansas SunTran · · · Ocala, Florida Ottumwa Transit Authority · · · Ottumwa, Iowa Pullman Transit · · · · Pullman, Washington River Bend Transit · · Quad Cities, Iowa Marble Valley Regional Transit District (MVRTD) · · · · · Rutland, Vermont City of Sioux Falls/Sioux Area Metro · · · · Sioux Falls, South Dakota Metro Ride Wausau, Wisconsin · · · · Subtotal Small 12 2 12 9 12 1 1 13 Table 3 continued on p. 14

OCR for page 14
Table 3 continued from p. 13 Agency Name Types of Buses and Services Height of Vehicle Types of Rail Service Height of Vehicle Interior Floor 14 Interior Floor Local Express/ BRT Paratransit Low-floor High- Commuter Heavy Light Streetcar, Platform- Low-floor High- bus commuter (dedicated (boarding) floor rail rail rail trolley or level (boarding) floor service buses right-of- buses buses other fixed entry trains trains way) rail service trains Medium CyRide · · · Ames, Iowa Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority (Tri Delta) Antioch, California · · · · · Valley Transit · · · Appleton, Wisconsin Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA) Concord, California · · · · VOTRAN · · · · Daytona Beach, Florida Lane Transit District · · · · Eugene, Oregon Lee County Transit · · · Ft. Myers, Florida/Lee County BC Transit · · · · Kelowna, British Columbia Laketran · · · · · Lake County, Ohio Metro Transit · · · · · Madison, Wisconsin North County Transit District (NCTD) · · · · · · · Oceanside, California Sarasota County Area Transit · · · · Sarasota, Florida Subtotal Medium 12 3 1 10 11 11 1 1 1 Table 3 continued on p. 15

OCR for page 15
Table 3 continued from p. 14 Agency Name Types of Buses and Services Height of Vehicle Types of Rail Service Height of Vehicle Interior Floor Interior Floor Local Express/ BRT Paratransit Low-floor High- Commuter Heavy Light Streetcar, Platform- Low-floor High- bus commuter (dedicated (boarding) floor rail rail rail trolley or level entry (boarding) floor service buses right-of- buses buses other fixed trains trains trains way) rail service Large Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) · · · · · Atlanta, Georgia Capital Metro · · · · · Austin, Texas Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) · · · · · Chicago, Illinois Community Transit · · · · · Everett, Washington Public Transit Division (TheBus) · · · · · Honolulu, Hawaii Metropolitan Transit Authority Harris County (METRO) · · · · · · · Houston, Texas Miami-Dade Transit · · · · · · Miami, Florida Société de transport de Montréal (STM) · · · · · · · · Montreal, Quebec NJ TRANSIT Corporation · · · · · · · · · · Newark, New Jersey MTA New York City Transit · · · · · · · · New York, New York San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) · · Oakland, California OC Transpo · · · · · · · · Ottawa, Ontario Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) · · · · · · · · · · Philadelphia, Penn. TriMet · · · · · · · · · · Portland, Oregon Utah Transit Authority (UTA) · · · · · · · · · Salt Lake City, Utah Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) · · · · · · · Washington, District of Columbia 15 Subtotal Large 15 11 5 13 15 10 5 8 7 2 12 3 5 Total 39 16 6 35 35 33 6 8 8 3 14 3 5