National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 88: Strollers, Carts, and Other Large Items on Buses and Trains (2011)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Murray, Gail, Goldman, Joey M, Transportation Research Board. "Literature Review on Segways, Scooters, and Other Mobility Devices and Accommodation Policies." TCRP Synthesis 88: Strollers, Carts, and Other Large Items on Buses and Trains. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
23
bottomleft bottomright
Page
23
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-4)
Methodology (5-5)
Organization of Report (6-6)
CHAPTER TWO - Characteristics of Surveyed Transit Agencies (7-10)
Agency Operations (11-15)
Literature Review on Wheelchairs and Wheelchair Accommodation Policies (16-17)
Survey Results (18-20)
One Agency's Experience: TriMet, Portland, Oregon - Revisiting Wheelchair Policies (21-22)
Literature Review on Segways, Scooters, and Other Mobility Devices and Accommodation Policies (23-23)
Survey Results (24-27)
One Agency's Experience: Metro Transit, Madison, Wisconsin - Learning Safe Operation of a Segway from a User (28-29)
Literature Review on Strollers and Stroller Accommodation Policies (30-32)
Survey Results (33-35)
One Agency's Experience: Tri Delta Transit, Antioch, California - Creating Space on Buses for Strollers (36-37)
Literature Review on Bicycles and Bicycle Accommodation Policies (38-40)
One Agency's Experience: King County Metro, Seattle - Three-Position Bike Racks (41-41)
Survey Results (42-45)
One Agency's Experience: BART, San Francisco Bay Area - Innovations for Bicycle Access on Rail (46-47)
Literature Review on Luggage, Carts, and Other Large Items and Accommodation Policies (48-49)
Survey Results (50-52)
One Agency's Experience: RoadRUNNER Transit, Las Cruces, New Mexico - A Different Way to Define Large Items (53-53)
General Large Items and Transport Aids (Strollers, Bicycles, Luggage, etc.) on Paratransit (54-54)
Other Large Items (55-56)
One Agency's Experience: Marble Valley Regional Transit District, Rutland, Vermont - Accommodating Skis and Snowboards, Suitcases and Pets (57-57)
Literature Review on Vehicle Design (58-59)
Survey Results (60-61)
Survey Responses (62-68)
One Agency's Experience: OC Transpo, Ottawa, Ontario - Developing, Refining, and Enforcing Policies, and Public Outcry (69-70)
Strollers (71-71)
Carts, Parcels, and Other Items (72-73)
REFERENCES (74-76)
APPENDIX A - Survey Questionnaire (77-122)
APPENDIX B - List of Participating Agencies (123-124)
APPENDIX C - Summary Tables of Agency Policies (125-132)
APPENDIX D - Sample Policies (133-164)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 23
23 CHAPTER FOUR SEGWAYS, SCOOTERS, AND OTHER MOBILITY DEVICES LITERATURE REVIEW ON SEGWAYS, SCOOTERS, AND ing Council composed guidance that states, "Transportation OTHER MOBILITY DEVICES AND ACCOMMODATION providers may establish their own general policies regarding POLICIES Segways and other devices, just as they do with respect to pets or bicycles. However, when a device is being used as "The use of non-traditional mobility aids is increasing and a mobility device by a person with a mobility-related dis- there is confusion and lack of uniformity in how they are ability, then the transportation provider must permit the accommodated," according to the 2008 Easter Seals Proj- person and his or her device onto the vehicle." The council ect ACTION Status Report on the Use of Wheelchairs and determined that Segways do not qualify as wheelchairs and, Other Mobility Devices on Public and Private Transporta- therefore, if they exceed ADA size allowances, they do not tion (Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates 2008). The need to be permitted (U.S.DOT and FTA 2005). report cites examples such as Segways, orthopedic strollers (pediatric wheelchairs or "wheelchair strollers"), scooters, and wheeled walkers with seats. Oxygen tanks can also be categorized as mobility aids when their use is essential for the rider to complete a trip. Figures 10 and 11 show a scooter and a Segway. FIGURE 10 Mobility scooter (courtesy : H. Cherin, Nelson\Nygaard Associates). FIGURE 11 Segway operating in the street (courtesy : Segway Policies Mauritsvink on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ File:Segway_Amsterdam.jpg). The Segway, a recent innovation gaining popularity, can be one of the most troublesome to physically accommo- BART adopted a policy in 2008 when a Segway ran off date because of its size and problems with maneuverability the platform and onto the tracks, causing a train to hit it and in a confined space. Although it is not an ADA-protected resulting in widespread system delays. Because other manu- mobility device, the U.S.DOT's Disability Law Coordinat- facturers are entering the market, BART's policy discusses