Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 3

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 2
2 Wayfinding and Signing Guidelines for Airport Terminals and Landside recognize the benefit of experiencing a transparent system of wayfinding and signs as they use the airport terminals and their landsides. 1.2 Historical Perspective Prior to the research that led to ACRP Project 07-06, "Wayfinding and Signage Guidelines for Airport Terminals and Landside," there was a previous guideline originally developed in 1984: Guidelines for Airport Signing and Graphics. Before looking forward, it is appropriate to include a historical perspective and review the events that led to where we are now. During the 1960s and through the mid 1970s, airport signing and graphic systems were designed to be predominantly permanent installations. This was due in large part to the relative stability in the aviation industry regarding which airlines served which airports combined with infrequent route changes. With certain airlines as fixtures at specific airports, the airlines them- selves had a very strong influence on terminal design and signage. Terms like "Baggage Claim" and "Boarding Area" found their way into the vernacular and soon became standards in the lan- guage of airport signage. Additionally, airline permanency made the use of premium materials for sign systems more economically feasible. These higher-end materials often had an ancillary benefit of reduced maintenance and repair costs over the life of the sign, which meant signs-- and terminology--that were designed to last. However, when President Carter signed the Airline Deregulation Act on October 24, 1978, the status quo was altered radically. With the stroke of a pen, airlines were now able to enter and exit airports with relative ease. The aggregate efforts of each airline's dynamic changes in "testing the market" (expansion or contraction in the number of cities served coupled with frequent reloca- tion within the airport terminal complex) required substantial and continual changes to sign sys- tems throughout most of the nation's airports. As a result, the cost associated with maintaining an effective informational signage system increased dramatically and, despite best efforts to the contrary, the traveling public was often left to navigate through inconsistency and confusion. To help rectify this situation, a joint aviation industry Airport Signing and Graphics Task Force was established in March 1982. This task force--led by Joseph Erhart, then manager of corporate design for Republic Airlines, and comprised of representatives from ATA, AAAE, and ACI-NA (then known as the Airport Operators Council International)--accepted the assignment to investigate the state of the industry and develop a reference guide that would inform airport operators, airlines, and consultants of economical and practical signing methods to be applied to various aviation facilities. In order to make this effort a more comprehensive and authoritative document, the task force requested and received valuable assistance and input from professionals in the design community: sign manufacturers, the Society of Environmental Graphics Designers (SEGD), the American Institute of Graphic Arts (AIGA), the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), the Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Civil Aero- nautics Board (CAB). For 2 years, these individuals played a key role in helping to create a publi- cation that would help the aviation industry reduce costs, increase flexibility, and provide a more uniform information system to assist the traveling public. The resulting publication--representing the philosophical consensus of everyone involved--entitled Guidelines for Airport Signing and Graphics was first distributed in September 1984. Over the years, Guidelines for Airport Signing and Graphics has been updated twice (1994 and 2001) to maintain its relevancy in the midst of an ever-changing and increasingly complex indus- try. The contents of the previous publication included guidelines and design criteria for devel- oping practical, functional, and flexible airport signing and graphics systems.