Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 130

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 129
Appendix G Industry Stakeholder Feedback Industry stakeholder feedback for six of the alternative procedures was sought during a peer review session in January 2011. The group consisted of nine airline, airport, and aviation asso- ciation representatives. Six of the seven alternative procedures were presented to the group and discussed. Participants were asked to consider and quantitatively rate each alternative as well as to provide qualitative pros and cons from their respective industry points of views. Tables G-1 and G-2 summarize the written responses received from stakeholders. Alternative Procedure 7 (door-to-door baggage service) was not reviewed by the industry stakeholder session in January 2011 as it did not directly affect airport-specific processes. Table G-1. Peer review session ratings of alternative procedures. Aviation Alternative Procedure Average Airline 1 Airport Airline 2 Association 1: Exemption of Checked 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 4.0 Baggage from FIS 2: AP1 + New Airline/Airport 2.5 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 Processes on Arrival 3: AP1 + New CBP Processes on 3.0 2.5 1.0 4.5 4.0 Arrival 4: Enhanced Pre-departure 2.1 2.5 1.0 3.0 2.0 Information 5: Information Sharing with 3.9 3.5 3.0 5.0 4.0 TSA Programs 6: Leveraging Other DHS 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Programs 7: Door-to-Door Baggage Service Not reviewed 5 = highest possible rating, 1 = lowest possi ble rating G-1

OCR for page 129
G-2Elimination or Reduction of Baggage Recheck for Arriving International Passengers Table G-2. Peer review session pros and cons of alternative procedures. Alternative Procedure Airport Airline 2 1: Exemption of Checked "Cleanest" solution Resistance of CBP to change and Baggage from FIS perceived "loss of control" 2: AP1 + New Airline/Airport Reduced operational costs Significant IT and infrastructure Processes on Arrival costs 3: AP1 + New CBP Processes on Reduced baggage connection Costly solutions Arrival times 4: Enhanced Pre-departure CBP risk issues addressed CBP resources required Information 5: Information Sharing with Bag connect times reduced Major investment by carrier or TSA Programs origin airport 6: Leveraging Other DHS Bags could be treated similar to Regulation issues or assent from Programs precleared Congress, TSA, DHS 7: Door-to-Door Baggage Service Not reviewed