Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 46


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 45
Testing and Evaluating Potential Solutions 45 associated with the rejection of a bag being imported into the United States that would increase both the fee for international door-to-door services and the logistics of handling CBP referrals to Secondary for air cargo shipment of passenger bags. Alternative Procedure Variations Beyond the seven categories of alternative procedures, several additional directions could be considered, pending further development: Large group handling: Where there are large groups of people (e.g., conventions, cruises, special events) with identical connecting routes, special procedures to deal with eliminating baggage recheck have been developed. These are site specific but could offer potential solu- tions that are relevant during peak-hour conditions. For example, the large number of visitors at and then departing Disney World is provided an off-site check-in facility to facilitate their process. Remote declaration: Global Entry has modified the Customs Declaration process to be an on-screen kiosk interaction between a passenger and CBP. Should technologies for in-flight communications continue to evolve, there may be additional programs developed that could assist in managing the flow of bags at transfer points. High-Level Evaluation Model A high-level evaluation model was outlined to prioritize the key benefits/costs for baggage recheck elimination/reduction based on the following four categories. Market Demand All solutions must be derived from market demand. A critical mass of travelers is needed to enable solutions to be facilitated. These can be based on improving customer satisfaction and new routing potential, among other criteria. Airlines New solutions could impose additional capital/operational costs on airlines. Of critical concern to the airlines are the incremental costs associated directly with the alternative process to produce a system cost reduction or neutral impact. For example, a shift of resources from the baggage recheck area to the ground handling team, or the process/costs, could be absorbed within existing ground handling and customer staff processes. The costs of the upline manage- ment (i.e., before a flight leaves for the United States) also must be factored into the evaluation criteria. Airports Airport costs are related to transport equipment and facilities (e.g., storage, sortation), passenger way-finding solutions, and/or additional facility/signage changes. However, the costs associated with the airport are mitigated by its ability to stimulate new traffic, which in turn can stimulate additional aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues (e.g., concessions). CBP Risk Management Finally, CBP's continued ability to conduct effective risk management techniques/protocols is of primary importance. While there are national parameters that will be used to mitigate key