National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 712: Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement (2012)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Button, Joe, Elseifi, Mostafa A, Scherocman, James A, Mohammad, Louay N, Bae, Abraham, Patel, Nachiketa, Transportation Research Board. "References." NCHRP Report 712: Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
82
bottomleft bottomright
Page
82
Front Matter (R1-R11)
Summary (1-3)
1.3 Research Scope (4-4)
1.4 Research Approach (5-6)
2.1 Tack Coat Materials (7-7)
2.3 Tack Coat Breaking and Setting Time (8-8)
2.4.1 Equipment (9-9)
2.4.2 Proper Tack Coat Application (10-10)
2.5.1 Laboratory Characterization of Tack Coats (11-13)
2.6 Worldwide Survey (14-18)
3.2.1 HMA Pavement Surface Preparation (19-19)
3.2.3 Tack Coat Application (20-21)
3.2.4 Overlay Construction (22-23)
3.2.6 Specimen Coring and Conditioning (24-26)
3.3 Experiment Plan I: Development of a Test Device to Evaluate the Quality of the Bond Strength of Tack Coat Spray Application in the Field (27-27)
3.6 Experiment Plan IV: Effects of Test Temperature and Its Relationship with Tack Coat Rheology (28-29)
3.8 Experiment Plan VI: Effects of Surface Texture and Permeability on Interface Shear Strength (30-31)
3.9 Theoretical Investigation (32-34)
4.1.2 Types of Tack Coat Applied to Different Pavement Surfaces (35-36)
4.1.3 Findings Related to Tack Coat Application Methods (37-43)
4.1.4 Findings Related to Tack Coat Application (44-44)
4.2 Experiment I: Development of a Test Device to Evaluate the Quality of the Bond Strength of Tack Coat Spray Application in the Field (45-45)
4.2.2 Second Generation of LTCQT (46-47)
4.2.3 Development of Tack Coat Test Procedure Using LTCQT (48-48)
4.2.5 Effect of Tack Coat Temperature on the Ultimate Tensile Strength (49-50)
4.3 Experiment II: Rheological Properties of Tack Coat Materials and Its Relationship to Bond Strength (51-51)
4.3.2 Relationship Between LTCQT Test Results and Tack Coat Rheological Properties (52-52)
4.4 Experiment III: Development of a Laboratory Test Procedure to Measure the Interface Bond Strength (53-54)
4.4.1 Effects of Tack Coat Characteristics on Interface Shear Strength (55-57)
4.4.2 Effect of Confining Pressure (58-59)
4.4.3 Effect of Dusty Conditions of HMA Surface (60-60)
4.5.1 Interface Bond Strength at Various Temperatures (61-64)
4.5.3 Relationship Between Interface Shear Strength and Tack Coat Rheology (65-65)
4.6.1 Effects of Tack Coat Type and Residual Application Rate (66-67)
4.6.3 Effects of Surface Wetness (68-68)
4.7 Experimental VI: Effects of Texture and Permeability on Tack Coat Bond Strength (69-71)
4.8 Theoretical Investigation (72-79)
Section 5 - Conclusions (80-81)
References (82-83)
Appendix A - Worldwide Survey Questionnaire (84-88)
Appendix B - ATacker Displacement Rate Verification Experiment (89-89)
Appendix C - Standard Test Method for Assessing Tack Coat Installation Quality Using the LTCQT (90-96)
Appendix D - Comparison of the LISST Device and the Simple Shear Tester (97-97)
Appendix E - Standard Test Procedure for Measuring Interface Bond Strength in the Laboratory Using the LISST (98-105)
Appendix F - Tack Coat Training Manual (106-134)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (135-135)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 82
82 References 1.ASTM D8-02, Standard Terminology Relating to Materials for 17. Estakhri, C.K. and Button, J.W. "Performance Evaluation of Roads and Pavements, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.03, NovachipTM--Ultrathin Friction Course," Report 553-2F, Texas 2004. Transportation Institute for Texas DOT, November 1995. 2. Roberts, F.L., Kandhal, P.S., Brown, E.R., Lee, D., and Kennedy, 18. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington. T.W. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials, Mixture Design, Construction. Sec- http://hotmix.ce.washington.edu/wsdot_web./Modules/07_ ond edition, NAPA Education Foundation, Lanham, MD, 1996. construction/tack_coats.htm. Tech Notes: "Tack Coat." Washington 3. CPB 03-1. "Paint Binder (Tack Coat) Guidelines." Construction State DOT, March 2003. Procedure Bulletin (CPB), California DOT, February 20, 2003. 19. "ASTM D 2995-99: Standard Practice for Estimating Application 4. Chaignon, F. and J.-C. Roffe. "Characterization Tests on Bond Coats: Rate of Bituminous Distributors." Annual Book of ASTM Standards Worldwide Study, Impact, Tests, Recommendations," Canadian 2003, Section 4: Construction, Volume 04.03, ASTM, West Con- Technical Asphalt Association, Toronto, Canada, November, 2001. shohocken, PA, 2003. 5. Roffe, J.-C. and F. Chaignon. "Characterization Tests on Bond 20. "COLNET and EMULCOL." Product Flyer, COLAS, France. Coats: Worldwide Study, Impact, Tests, Recommendations," 3rd 21. Sangiorgi C., A.C. Collop, and N.H. Thom. "Laboratory Assessment International Conference on Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements, of Bond Condition using the Leutner Shear Test." 3rd International Thessaloniki, Greece, 2002, pp. 315. Conference on Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements, Thessaloniki, 6. Paul, H.R. and Scherocman, J.A. "Friction Testing of Tack Coat Sur- Greece, 2002, pp. 315­324. faces," Transportation Research Record 1616, Transportation Research 22. Uzan, J., Livneh, M., and Eshed, Y. "Investigation of Adhesion Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC; pp. 6­12, 1998. Properties Between Asphaltic Concrete Layers," Asphalt Paving 7. Cross, S.A. and P.P. Shrestha. "Guidelines for Using Prime and Technology, Vol. 47, pp. 495­521, February 1978. Tack Coats." Report No. FHWA-CFL-04-001, Central Federal 23. Mohammad, L.N., M.A. Raqib, and B. Huang. "Influence of Lands Highway Division, FHWA, Lackwood, CO, 2004. Asphalt Tack Coat Materials on Interface Shear Strength." Trans- 8. "Bituminous Tack Coat." Unified Facilities Guide Specification portation Research Record 1789, Transportation Research Board, (UFGS) 02744N. the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2002, pp. 56­65. 9. Construction of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements. Manual Series No. 22 24. Mrawira, D. and D. Damude. "Revisiting the Effectiveness of Tack (MS-22), Second edition, The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY. Coats in HMA Overlays: The Shear Strength of Tack Coats in 10. A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual. Manual Series No. 19 (MS-19), Young Overlays," Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference, Canadian Third edition, The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY. Technical Asphalt Association, pp. 116­129, 1999. 11. The Asphalt Handbook. Manual Series No. 4 (MS-4), 1989 edition, 25. Crispino M., Festa B., Giannattasio P., and V. Nicolosi. "Evalua- The Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY. tion of the Interaction between the Asphalt Concrete Layers by a 12. Hot-Mix Asphalt Paving Handbook 2000. AC 150/5370-14A, New Dynamic Test." Proceeding of the 8th International Conference USACE, 2000. on Asphalt Pavements, Vol-1, pp. 741­754, 1997. 13. "Proper Tack Coat Application." Technical Bulletin, Flexible Pave- 26. Canestrari, F. and E. Santagata. "Temperature Effects on the Shear ment of Ohio, Columbus, OH, 2001. Behavior of Tack Coat Emulsions Used in Flexible Pavements," Inter- 14. Hachiya, Y. and Sato, K. "Effect of Tack Coat on Bonding Character- national Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 39­46, istics at Interface between Asphalt Concrete Layers," Proceedings of March 2005. the 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, pp. 349­362, 27. Hakim, B., Cheung, L.W., and Armitage, R.J. "Use of FWD Data 1997. for the Prediction of Bonding between Pavement Layers," Interna- 15. Sholar, G.A., G.C. Page, J.A. Musselman, P.B. Upshaw, and H.L. tional Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 49­59, 2000. Moseley. "Preliminary Investigation of a Test Method to Evaluate 28. Raab, C. and Partl, M.N. "Effect of Tack Coats on Interlayer Shear Bond Strength of Bituminous Tack Coats." Journal of the Association Bond of Pavements," 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 73, 2004. Southern Africa. 16. Estakhri, C.K. and Button, J.W. "Evaluation of NovachipTM-- 29. Akhtarhusein, A.T., Rahman, M.S., Moreshwar B.K., and Xu, Construction Report," Research Report 553-1, Texas Transporta- Q.X. "A Mechanistic Approach to Evaluate Contribution of Prime tion Institute for Texas DOT, July, 1994. and Tack Coat In Composite Asphalt Pavements," Final Report,

OCR for page 83
83 FHWA/NC/2004-05, North Carolina DOT, Department of Civil Decks." Transportation Research Record 1740, Transportation Engineering, North Carolina State University, June 25, 2004. Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001, 30. Raab, C. and M. Partl. "Interlayer Shear Performance: Experience pp. 143­150. with Different Pavement Structures." 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobi- 37. ATACKERTM, A Tack Coat Testing Device, Operator's Guide, Instro- tume Congress, Vienna, 2004. Tek, Inc., 2005. 31.Buchanan, S. and M. Woods. "Field Tack Coat Evaluator 38. "AASHTO T 315-05: Standard Method of Test for Determination (ATACKerTM)", Final Report, FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-168, the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic December 2004. Shear Rheometer (DSR)," AASHTO. 32. West, R., Zhang, J., and Moore, J. "Evaluation of Bond Strength 39. "AASHTO M208: Standard Specification for Cationic Emulsified between Pavement Layers," NCAT Report No. 05­xx, National Asphalt," AASHTO. Center for Asphalt Technology, August 2005. 40. "ASTM E74-06: Standard Practice of Calibration of Force-Measuring 33. DeJong, D.L. Computer Program: BISAR, Royal/Shell Laboratory, Instruments for Verifying the Force Indication of Testing Machines," External Report AMSR0006.73, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1973. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.01, 2006. 34. Crispino, M., Festa, B., Giannattasio, P., and Nicolosi, V. "Evalua- 41. Canestrari, F., Ferrotti, G., Partl, M.N., and Santagata, E. "Advanced tion of the Interaction between the Asphalt Concrete Layers by a New Testing and Characterization of Interlayer Shear Resistance," Trans- Dynamic Test." 8th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, portation Research Record 1929, Transportation Research Board, the Vol. 1, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, pp. 741­754, 1997. National Academies, Washington, DC, 2005, pp. 69­78. 35. Romanoschi, S. and Metcalf, J. "Characterization of Asphalt 42. McGhee, K.K. and T. Clark. "Bond Expectations for Milled Sur- Concrete Layer Interfaces." Transportation Research Record 1778, faces and Typical Tack Coat Materials Used in Virginia." Final Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Report VTRC 09-R21, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Washington, DC, 2001, pp. 132­139. Charlottesville, VA. 36. Donovan, E., Al-Qadi, I., and Loulizi, A. "Optimization of Tack 43. Huang, Y.H. Pavement Analysis and Design, Prentice Hall, NJ, 2nd Coat Application Rate for Geocomposite Membrane on Bridge edition, 2004.