Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. Travel and the Built Environ- ment: A Synthesis. In Transportation Research Record: Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 87â114. Golledge, R., and T. Garling. 2003. Cognitive Maps and Urban Travel. Research Paper No. 601, University of Cali- fornia Transportation Center. Guo, J. Y., and C. R. Bhat. 2004. Modifiable Areal Units: Problem or Perception in Modeling of Residential Location Choice? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1898, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 138â147. Guo, J. Y., and C. R. Bhat. 2007. Operationalizing the Con- cept of Neighborhood: Application to Residential Location Choice Analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 31â45. Handy, S. 1996. Methodologies for Exploring the Link Between Urban Form and Travel Behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 151â165. Kitamura, R., P. L. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. 1997. Micro- Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 125â158. Krizek, K. J. 2003. Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel: Does Neighborhood- Scale Urban Form Mat- ter? Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 265â281. Lewbel, A. 2004. Simple Estimators For Hard Problems: Endogeneity in Discrete Choice Related Models. Working Papers in Economics No. 604, Boston College, Mass. Louviere, J., K. Train, M. Ben- Akiva, C. R. Bhat, D. Brown- stone, T. A. Cameron, R. T. Carson, J. R. DeShazo, D. Fiebig, W. Greene, D. Hensher, and D. Waldman. 2005. Recent Progress on Endogeneity in Choice Modeling. Mar- keting Letters, Vol. 16, No. 3, Dec., pp. 255â265. Lund, H. 2003. Testing the Claims of New Urbanism. APA Journal, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 414â429. Rajamani, J., C. R. Bhat, and S. Handy. 2003. Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level- of- Service Effects. In Transportation Research Record: Jour- nal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 158â165. Rodriguez, D.A., A. J. Khattak, and K. R. Evenson. 2005. Can Neighborhood Design Encourage Walking and Bicycling? Physical Activity on a New Urbanist and a Conventional Suburban Community. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Schwanen, T., and P. L. Mokhtarian. 2005. What Affects Com- mute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2005, pp. 83â99. Shay, E., and A. J. Khattak. 2005. Automobile Ownership and Use in Neo- Traditional and Conventional Neighborhoods. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Trans- portation Research Board, No. 1902, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 18â25. ADDITIONAL RESOURCE Handy, S., X. Cao, T. J. Buehler, and P. Mokhtarian. 2005. The Link Between the Built Environment and Travel Behav- ior: Correlation or Causality? Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D.C. 141AN INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK