Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 64
P R O C E S S I N G T H E D E N V E R T R AV E L S U RV E Y 53 Portland, Oregon. DOT-T-99-02. U.S. Department of No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Transportation, 1998. Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 6877. 6. Bowman, J., M. Bradley, Y. Shiftan, K. Lawton, and M. 8. The Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission Model: Val- Ben-Akiva. Demonstration of an Activity-Based Model Sys- idation and Final Report, draft, PB Consult, New York, tem for Portland. Presented at 8th World Conference on April 2004. Transport Research, Antwerp, Belgium, 1998. 9. PB Consult. Progress Report for the Year 2003: Modeling 7. Vovsha, P., E. Peterson, and R. Donnelly. Microsimulation Task 2--Activity/Tour-Based Models. Regional Trans- in Travel Demand Modeling: Lessons Learned from the portation Plan Major Update Project. Atlanta Regional New York Best Practice Model. In Transportation Research Commission, Atlanta, Ga., Jan. 2004. Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board,