National Academies Press: OpenBook

Crash Records Systems (2005)

Chapter: References

« Previous: Chapter Five - Conclusions
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Crash Records Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13688.
×
Page 29
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Crash Records Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13688.
×
Page 30

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

30 1. Halladay, M.L., et al., Traffic Safety Information Sys- tems in Europe and Australia, Report FHWA-PL-04- 010, Office of International Programs, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (HPIP), Washington, D.C., 2004, 112 pp. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.international.fhwa.dot.gov/tsis_04010/ index.htm [2004, Sep.]. 2. An Evaluation of the Highway Safety Program—A Report to Congress from the Secretary of Transporta- tion, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., July 1977. 3. Highway Safety Act of 1966, U.S. Statutes at Large, Vol. 80, pt. 1, PL 89-564, secs. 402–403, 1967, 2743. 4. Highway Safety Act of 1966, U.S. Statutes at Large, Vol. 80, pt. 1, PL 89-564, secs. 402–403, 1967. 5. Highway Safety Program Standards, United States Code of Federal Regulations, Vol. 23, 506, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 1983. 6. “Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents,” 6th ed., ANSI D-16, National Safety Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 1996 [Online]. Available: http:// nhtsa.dot.gov/people/perform/trafrecords/crash2003/pdf/ d16.pdf (n.d.). 7. “States’ Model Motorist Data Base Data Element Dic- tionary for Traffic Records Systems,” ANSI D-20-2002, American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, Arlington, Va., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www. aamva.org/Documents/std2003ANSIDICTIONARYFI NAL.pdf [2004, Nov. 24]. 8. “State Data Systems,” National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administra- tion, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www-nrd.nhtsa. dot.gov/departments/nrd-30/ncsa//SDS.html (n.d.). 9. Council, F.M. and J.F. Paniati, “The Highway Safety Information System (HSIS),” Public Roads, Vol. 54, No. 3, Dec. 1990, pp. 234–240. 10. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), Public Law 102-240, 105, Stat. 2177, Dec. 1991. 11. CADRE—Critical Automated Data Reporting Elements for Highway Safety Analysis, National Safety Council, Chicago, Ill., June 30, 1991. 12. Johnson, S.W. and J. Walker, The Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES), NHTSA Technical Report, Report DOT HS 808 338, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1996, 98 pp. 13. “Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC),” 2nd ed., National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot. gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/MMUCC/2003/MMUCC_02.pdf [2003, Apr.]. 14. Safety Management Systems: Good Practices for Devel- opment and Implementation, Office of Highway Safety, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1996, 30 pp. 15. Uniformity in Motor Carrier Accident Reporting: Rec- ommendations for the States, National Governors’ Asso- ciation Center for Policy Research, Washington, D.C., June 1988. 16. Highway Safety Program Advisories, Report DOT HS 807 655, National Highway Traffic Safety Administra- tion, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1990, pp. 47–59. 17. An Evaluation of Traffic Accident Records Systems in Texas and Other States, Policy Research Project Report 65, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin, 1984, p. 8. 18. Contact Surveys conducted by National Highway Traf- fic Safety Administration and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Unpublished, 2004. 19. Pfefer, R.C., R.A. Raub, and R.E. Lucke, Highway Safety Data: Costs, Quality, and Strategies for Improvement, Final Report, Report FHWA-RD-96-192, Federal High- way Administration, McLean, Va., Jan. 1998, 34 pp. 20. Traffic Records Advisory, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, Washington, D.C., 1998. 21. O’Day, J., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 192: Accident Data Quality, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, 48 pp. 22. Hatch, C.E., Effectiveness and Efficiencies in Traffic Records, National Highway Traffic Safety Administra- tion, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Mar. 1982, 34 pp. 23. Hughes, W.E., et al., New and Emerging Technologies for Improving Accident Data Collection, Report FHWA-RD- 92-097, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1993, p. 8. 24. Pfefer, R.C., T.R. Neuman, and R.A. Raub, NCHRP Report 430: Improved Safety Information to Support Highway Design, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, p. 38. 25. Cannon, J.L., Technocar 2000: The Car of the Future, Law Enforcement Technology, Nov. 1994, pp. 42–44. 26. Crouse, M.R., Emerging Technologies for Automated Data Collection, Report TARE-90, Texas Transporta- tion Institute, College Station, Jan. 1992. REFERENCES

31 27. DeLucia, B.H. and R.A. Scopatz, “Safety Data Action Plan Project 9: Explore Options for Using Technology in Data Collection,” Presented at the Safety in Numbers Conference, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Wash- ington, D.C., Jan. 9, 2002. 28. Thielman, C.Y., Expert Systems for Crash Data Col- lection, Report FHWA-RD-99-052, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 1999, 73 pp. 29. National Model: Statewide Application of Data Collection and Management Technology to Improve Highway Safety, Report FHWA-RD-99-140, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1999, 4 pp. 30. Griffith, M.S., C. Hayden, and H. Kalla, “Data is Key to Understanding and Improving Safety,” Public Roads, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2003, pp. 42–47 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/03jan/09.htm [2003, Jan./Feb.]. 31. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 21: Highway Location Reference Methods, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974, 30 pp. 32. Zegeer, C.V., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 91: Highway Accident Analysis Systems, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1982, 69 pp. 33. A National Agenda for the Improvement of Highway Safety Information Systems, National Safety Council, Chicago, Ill., 1996, 10 pp. 34. “The Strategic Highway Safety Plan,” American Asso- ciation of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., Sep. 1997 [Online]. Available: http:// safety.transportation.org/plan.aspx [n.d.]. 35. Griffith, M.S. and B.H. DeLucia, “Traffic Safety Infor- mation Systems: An International Scan Aimed to Find Strategies for Improving Safety Data,” Public Roads, Vol. 68, No. 2, Sep./Oct. 2004, pp. 52–56.

Next: Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire »
Crash Records Systems Get This Book
×
 Crash Records Systems
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 350: Crash Records Systems examines crash records systems practices and programs as applied to highway and traffic safety. The report covers crash data collection, crash processing and management, and data linkages for reporting and analysis. While no single comprehensive system examples are identified in the report, many examples of one or more successful components were found to address the needs of three groups of stakeholders—data collectors, data managers, and data users. The report also contains information about lessons learned from examples of successful systems, addressing the needs and concerns of stakeholders.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!