Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 21


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 20
How the proposed changes would affect protected population groups. The methods presented in this chapter include many effective techniques for identifying protected populations using demographic data. This information can be collected either directly or from sources such as the U.S. Census Bureau. In addition, various geographic information system (GIS) and database applications allow you to process 1990 and 2000 census data and apply a number of the methods presented in this chapter. The methods presented generally involve the following steps: Collect the necessary information. Verify the accuracy of the information if possible. Calculate pertinent population statistics. Assess the presence or absence of protected populations. Many of the methods are quantitative and use census data, survey data, and GIS. Other methods are more qualitative and rely heavily on local knowledge and the public participation process. Which method is best to use depends on various factors including the probable magnitude of a particular impact, data availability and cost, and the capabilities and experience of the person performing the analysis. The most important factor is whether or not the method is appropriate for the type of transportation system change being evaluated. For example, some effects of transportation system projects are distributed geographically, whereas other effects are distributed among system users based on their demographic characteristics. The best methods and data for identifying the demographic characteristics of affected populations may differ from case to case. One purpose of any protected population assessment is to accurately represent the demographic characteristics of the affected populations. Any assessment should include input from members of the public and individuals with comparatively high levels of knowledge of the local area. Many methods rely directly upon these sources of information. For other methods, such as those that rely on census data, local knowledge and public input can be used to validate source data and study results. A number of special considerations must be addressed when evaluating census data to identify protected populations. Some of these considerations include identifying appropriate comparison thresholds for analysis; selecting the appropriate scale of census data; estimating population characteristics for study areas; and comparing historic census data with current (2000) census data. These special topics are addressed in this chapter and in the appendices to this guidebook. STATE OF THE PRACTICE Most studies conducted since the mid-1990s to conform to requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) include some level of demographic review that includes analysis of minority and low-income population information. Inclusion of this information in 20

OCR for page 20
transportation planning studies is common but not universal. A review of recent NEPA- conformance studies and a survey of practitioners show that local knowledge and analysis of large-scale census data are the most commonly used techniques for identifying protected populations (Sheeley and Forkenbrock 2002). Similar types of environmental justice assessment are also becoming commonplace in planning products such as major investment studies (MISs). Field survey and data collection techniques also are commonly used. Assessment results released to the public often are brief summaries with very little detail. The specific methods used and analytical results obtained generally are not documented in detail. Some techniques are used more rarely because of their technical complexity. These include formalized public participation-based qualitative assessment techniques, detailed assessment of small-scale census data, and complex methods such as historical data analysis and population projection. The state of practice could clearly be enhanced, however, if these rigorous assessment methods were more accessible to practitioners. Making these methods more accessible is one of the goals of this guidebook. The methods presented in this chapter cover the spectrum of potential approaches from simple to complex and qualitative to quantitative. A key consideration in environmental justice analyses related to potential transportation projects is how protected populations move about in time and space. Because few people spend the majority of their time at home, it often is not sufficient to determine only where minority and low-income populations live; it also is important to ascertain prevalent daily activity spaces. Trip diaries and surveys are the most common means of identifying how people move about in time and space. These methods can be very simple in nature or quite involved. The survey data can reveal the activity space within which protected populations frequently, occasionally, or seldom travel. Revealed preference analyses are a practical way to evaluate how people actually respond to the choices available to them, and therefore what their preferences are when trading off attributes. These analyses enable you to assess, for example, how groups of people balance lower prices against convenience when purchasing goods. With sufficient data, this approach can enable you to "make direct inferences about the trade-offs travelers make among site and distance attributes" (Pipkin 1986, p. 183). When using these analyses, you should keep in mind that people will reveal preferences only in terms of the available alternatives. In considering shopping trips, Pipkin pointed out that individuals who do not own a vehicle or are otherwise disadvantaged might be forced to forego certain kinds of trips or to restrict their travel to nearer, smaller, and perhaps more expensive alternatives. Variables that help explain travel patterns include the following: Personal attributes such as age, ethnicity, income, and level of education; Site characteristics such as price, quality and convenience for shopping, service, or recreational destinations; and 21