Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 50


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 49
49 6.6.4 Step 4: Compare Expected Crashes is 10 fatal, 1,200 injury, and 4,200 PDO. Therefore, with and without PRPMs the RIC can be calculated as follows: The difference between the expected number of nighttime (1, 304.3 10 + 27.4 1, 200 + 4, 200) nonintersection crashes estimates from Steps 2 and 3 is cal- RIC = (10 + 1, 200 + 4, 200) (6-7) culated as = 9.25 ^ 2002 - E( K2002 ) =K PRPM = 1.841 - 1.0005 (6.5) b) Estimate the potential reduction in crash costs. The average cost of a crash is the product of the RIC and = 0.841 crashes per mile-year the cost of a PDO crash: Cost per crash = 9.25 $2,300 (6-8) 6.6.5 Step 5: Conduct a Benefit-Cost Analysis = $21,275 per crash A sample benefit-cost analytical procedure is presented here: The total savings per year is the product of the aver- a) Estimate the relative injury cost (RIC) for all two- age cost of a crash and the expected crash reduction lane roadways (or a large sample) in the jurisdiction: per year: wfat (Fat) + winj (Inj) + (PDO) Crash savings benefit RIC = (6-6) (Fat) + (Inj) + (PDO) per year = $21,275 * 0.841 (6-9) = $17,892 per mile-year Where c) Determine an annual cost of installing and maintain- Fat = Number of fatal injury crashes, Inj = Number of nonfatal injury crashes, ing PRPMs. Each jurisdiction should obtain its own PDO = Number of property-damage-only crashes, annual cost estimate for the installation and mainte- wfat = Weighting factor for fatal injury crashes, nance of PRPMs at the study locations. and The annual cost estimate will consist of three winj = Weighting factor for nonfatal injury crashes. components: 1. Indirect installation cost. This includes the cost The weighting factor for fatal injury crashes (wfat) of providing work zone signs, attenuation vehi- is the ratio of the cost of a fatal injury crash to the cles, special law enforcement, and so forth to cost of a PDO crash. The weighting factor for non- implement PRPMs. This cost is incurred at each fatal injury crashes is the ratio of the cost of a non- site where PRPM lenses are replaced or PRPMs fatal injury crash to the cost of a PDO crash. The two are installed. The indirect cost per PRPM can be most commonly used accident cost figures are those determined by dividing the total indirect cost by contained in the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide the total number of PRPMs to be installed during (50) and the FHWA comprehensive cost figures the contract. The following equation can be used based on the willingness-to-pay concept. Users to determine the annual indirect cost, A: should choose the set of accident cost figures that best suits their particular study. Table 6-7 shows the COST i(1 + i ) n crash costs used by the FHWA (51) updated to 2002 A= (6-10) (1 + i ) n - 1 dollars and the RIC values estimated from these crash cost values. Assume that on all two-lane roadways within this Where jurisdiction, the average number of crashes per year COST = Indirect cost of installation per PRPM, i = Annual discount rate, and TABLE 6-7 Crash costs n = Number of years in lens replacement and relative injury cost values cycle. Crash severity Cost (2002) RIC Fatal $3,000,000 1304.3 If the indirect cost of implementing 500 PRPMs is $5,000, then the indirect cost per PRPM = Injury $63,000 27.4 $5,000/500 = $10. Assuming a discount rate PDO $2,300 1.0 of 5 percent, the annual cost = 10 0.05

OCR for page 49
50 (1.05)3/[(1.05)3 - 1] = $3.67 per PRPM for a 3-year discount rate of 5 percent, the annual cost equals lens replacement cycle. 6.20 0.05 (1.05)3/[(1.05)3 - 1] = $2.28 per 2. Direct installation cost. This refers to the actual PRPM is estimated for a 3-year lens replacement cost of installing or replacing the PRPM and cycle. If justified by jurisdictional procedures, includes the cost of material, equipment, and labor. any annual costs incurred by lens replacement Equation 6-10 can be used to calculate the annual outside the typical cycle should be included in the direct installation cost, in which case n is equal to overall maintenance costs. The total annual cost the number of years in the PRPM replacement per PRPM is the sum of these three cost compo- cycle. For example, in Missouri (52), the cost of nents: $3.67 + $5.50 + $2.28 = $11.45. Based on installing one PRPM is about $42.50, and PRPMs this assumed cost, the cost per mile (1 mile = are replaced every 10 years. Assuming a discount 5,280 ft) for 40 ft and 80 ft PRPM spacings are rate of 5 percent, the annual cost equals 42.50 $1,511 and $756, respectively. For the example 0.05 (1.05)10/[(1.05)10 - 1] = $5.50 per PRPM for illustrated here, if PRPMs are implemented at a a 10-year PRPM replacement cycle. 40-ft (12-m) spacing (at curves) for 80 percent of 3. Maintenance cost. This refers to the average the length of the 1-mile-long section and at 80-ft annual cost of replacing the lens according to the (24-m) spacing for the remainder of the length, replacement cycle and includes the cost of mate- the annual PRPM implementation and mainte- rials, equipment, and labor. Equation 6-10 can be nance cost will be 0.8($1,511) + 0.2($756) = used to calculate the annual maintenance cost, in $1,360 for a 1-mile-long, two-lane roadway which case n is equal to the number of years in the section. lens replacement cycle. For example, Missouri d) Determine benefit-cost ratio. The benefit-cost ratio DOT replaces the lens every 3 years at a cost of equals the present value of crash savings divided by approximately $6.20 per lens (52). Assuming a the implementation cost ($17,892/$1,360 = 13.16).