National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 518: Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Pavement Markers (2004)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Smiley, A, McGee, H, Persaud, B, Lyon, C, Bahar, G, Mollett, C, Smahel, T, Transportation Research Board. "Appendix A - Details of Calibrated Safety Performance Functions." NCHRP Report 518: Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Pavement Markers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
55
bottomleft bottomright
Page
55
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-2)
Chapter 1 - Introduction (3-3)
2.1.2 Retroreflective PRPMs (4-4)
2.1.3 Implementation Criteria and Maintenance Procedures (5-6)
2.2.1 Review of Literature (7-11)
2.2.2 Methodological Problems in Past Research (12-12)
2.3.1 Driver Needs with Respect to Delineation and Visibility (13-13)
2.3.2 Visibility of PRPMs (14-16)
2.3.3 Driver Behavior in Response to PRPMs (17-22)
2.3.4 Summary (23-23)
3.1 State Survey and Selection of Potential States for PRPM Safety Evaluation (24-24)
3.2.1 PRPM Treatment Sites Inventory (25-25)
3.2.2 Reference and Comparison Group Sites (26-26)
3.2.3 Crash Data (27-27)
3.2.5 Traffic Volume Data (28-30)
3.2.6 Additional Delineation and Guidance Measures (31-32)
4.1 Composite Analysis Methodology (33-33)
4.2.2 Multivariate Modeling of the Index of Effectiveness (Theta) (34-34)
4.3.3 Multivariate Modeling of the Index of Effectiveness (Theta site) (35-36)
4.4.1 Composite Analysis (37-38)
4.5 Results of the Composite Analysis for Four-Lane Divided Expressways (39-39)
5.1.1 Overview of Human Factors Issues (40-40)
5.1.2 Expected PRPM Impacts on Two-Lane Roadways (41-41)
5.2.2 Expected PRPM Impacts on Four-Lane Freeways, (42-43)
6.1 Background (44-44)
6.4 Proposed Revisions to the MUTCD (45-45)
6.5 Overview of the Analytical Engineering Procedure (46-46)
6.6.2 Step 2: Estimate Expected Nighttime Nonintersection Crashes without PRPMs (47-47)
6.6.3 Step 3: Estimate Expected Nighttime Nonintersection Crashes with PRPMs (48-48)
6.6.5 Step 5: Conduct a Benefit-Cost Analysis (49-50)
Chapter 7 - Conclusions (51-52)
References (53-54)
Appendix A - Details of Calibrated Safety Performance Functions (55-60)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (61-61)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 55
A-1 APPENDIX A DETAILS OF CALIBRATED SAFETY PERFORMANCE FUNCTIONS The tables in this appendix summarize the safety perfor- · TER = 0 if flat terrain, 1 if rolling terrain. mance functions and annual factors developed as part of this · DOC = degree of curvature. study. The information is organized by roadway type: · ENV = environmental type (either urban or rural). · s.e. = standard error. · Two-lane roadways (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New · 1, 2, 3, and 4 = model coefficients. York, and Illinois), · Four-lane freeways (Pennsylvania, New York, Missouri, To account for the effect of trends in safety not related to and Wisconsin), and traffic volumes, annual factors were estimated using a pro- · Four-lane divided expressways (Pennsylvania and cedure documented by Harwood et al. ("Prediction of the Wisconsin). Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane High- ways," FHWA-RD-99-207, Federal Highway Administra- The symbols and short forms in the following tables are tion, 2000). defined here: The methodology used this report compared data before PRPMs were installed with data after PRPMs were installed. · k = calibrated parameter relating the mean and variance The actual year that the PRPMs were installed cannot be used of the prediction. for data analysis because for part of the year there were no · f = factor applied to the calibrated model to predict for PRPMs and for part of the year PRPMs were installed. The a crash type other than that used for the model calibration. data from the same year as the installation of the PRPMs was · AADT = annual average daily traffic. not used in the analysis, which is why certain years of data · SW = shoulder width in feet. are missing.

OCR for page 56
A-2 TABLE A-1 Safety performance functions for two-lane roadways Model Form Pennsylvania New Jersey New York I llinois Crashes per Mile-yr (AADT)1exp(2DOC) (AADT)1exp(3SW) (AADT)1exp(3 SW) (AADT)1exp(3SW + 4TER) ln()(s.e.) -6.1060 (0.3340) -10.4380 (0.8970) -7.8980 (0.6050) -7.1120 (0.4630) 1 (s.e.) 0.7640 (0.0398) 1.3292 (0.0954) 1.0218 (0.0690) 0.8988 (0.0576) 2 (s.e.) 0.0400 (0.0126) NA NA NA 3 (s.e.) NA -0.0504 (0.0148) -0.0669 (0.0167) -0.0613 (0.0282) 4 (s.e.) NA NA NA 0.1720 (0.0956) k 3.2 2.2 3.5 3.1 Model parameters f k f k f k f k Total 1.000 3.2 1.000 2.2 1.000 3.5 1.000 3.1 Fatal and injury 0.195 4.3 0.430 2.2 0.738 3.4 0.262 1.9 Daytime 0.578 2.6 0.656 1.6 0.600 3.7 0.479 3.4 Daytime fatal and injury 0.101 3.8 0.298 2.1 0.468 3.2 0.148 2.2 Nighttime 0.422 3.1 0.344 2.8 0.400 2.2 0.521 2.5 Nighttime fatal and injury 0.094 2.6 0.131 2.0 0.270 2.9 0.135 1.6 Dry 0.657 2.7 0.729 1.9 0.590 3.1 0.690 2.9 Wet 0.337 2.0 0.270 1.8 0.390 7.4 0.247 1.7 Head-on 0.067 3.0 0.064 2.2 Sample size too small 0.031 3.1 Guidance-related 0.209 3.6 0.045 0.7 0.368 2.5 TABLE A-2 Pennsylvania two-lane roadways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Head- Guidance- Injury and Injury and Injury On Related 1991 0.94 1.00 0.84 0.81 1.09 1.21 1.01 0.84 0.75 1.05 1992 1.00 1.17 0.88 1.04 1.17 1.30 0.92 1.19 0.72 0.96 1993 1.00 1.01 0.99 0.84 1.02 1.18 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.93 1994 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.89 0.99 0.83 0.83 1.01 0.98 1995 0.98 1.03 1.05 1.05 0.88 1.00 1.02 0.91 1.08 1.14 1996 0.97 0.87 0.95 0.79 0.99 0.94 0.95 0.99 0.69 1.06 1997 0.97 0.85 1.02 0.78 0.90 0.93 0.87 1.18 1.30 1.12 1998 0.97 0.85 1.02 1.01 0.90 0.68 1.05 0.81 1.14 0.82 1999 1.07 0.94 1.16 1.37 0.96 0.49 1.15 0.92 1.12 1.10 2000 1.19 1.35 1.21 1.41 1.16 1.29 1.13 1.25 1.19 0.76 TABLE A-3 New Jersey two-lane roadways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Head-On Injury and Injury and Injury 1991 0.89 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.84 0.84 0.91 0.84 0.89 1992 0.93 0.91 0.90 0.88 0.98 0.99 0.91 0.98 0.94 1993 PRPM Implementation Year 1994 1.11 1.05 1.11 1.05 1.11 1.05 1.11 1.11 1.12 1995 1.05 0.95 1.05 0.95 1.05 0.95 1.05 1.05 1.05 1996 PRPM Implementation Year 1997 1.14 0.89 1.14 0.89 1.14 0.90 1.14 1.14 1.14 1998 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.01 NOTE: It was not possible to extract guidance-related crashes from the New Jersey database.

OCR for page 57
A-3 TABLE A-4 New York two-lane roadways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1993 1.00 1.04 1.01 1.06 0.98 1.00 1.05 0.90 1.16 1994 1.01 0.99 1.02 0.95 0.99 1.04 0.97 1.06 1.04 1995 0.98 1.05 1.00 1.09 0.94 0.96 0.97 0.97 0.87 1996 0.90 0.81 0.85 0.77 0.97 0.87 0.89 0.95 0.79 1997 1.16 0.84 1.12 0.96 1.22 0.64 1.19 1.05 0.52 1998 PRPM Implementation Year 1999 1.69 0.83 1.45 0.80 2.05 0.88 1.91 1.35 0.68 2000 2.04 0.87 1.77 0.92 2.43 0.79 2.04 1.99 0.87 2001 2.20 1.14 2.15 1.27 2.27 0.93 1.25 3.61 0.88 NOTE: Head-on crashes were not included because of sample size limitations. TABLE A-5 Illinois two-lane roadways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Head- Guidance- Injury and Injury and Injury On Related 1991 1.20 0.93 1.20 1.20 1.40 0.93 1.24 1.28 1.20 1.20 1992 1.10 1.07 1.10 1.10 1.16 1.07 1.17 1.10 1.10 1.10 1993 1.20 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.15 1.16 1.12 1.45 1.20 1.20 1994 1.04 1.11 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.11 1.00 0.89 1.04 1.04 1995 1.13 1.41 1.13 1.13 0.94 1.41 1.13 0.96 1.13 1.13 1996 0.91 1.01 0.91 0.91 0.86 1.01 0.90 0.94 0.91 0.91 1997 0.95 1.10 0.95 0.95 0.84 1.10 0.94 0.88 0.95 0.95 1998 0.89 0.81 0.89 0.89 0.78 0.81 0.88 0.83 0.89 0.89 1999 1.03 1.00 1.03 1.03 0.91 1.00 1.03 0.96 1.03 1.03 2000 1.02 0.96 1.02 1.02 0.90 0.96 1.02 0.95 1.02 1.02 TABLE A-6 Safety performance functions for four-lane freeways Model Form Pennsylvania1 New York Missouri 1 Wisconsin 1 1 1 Crashes per Mile-yr (AADT/2) (AADT) (AADT) (AADT)1exp(2ENV) ln() (s.e.) -7.7170 (0.3850) -1.7320 (0.9490) -11.1500 (0.3370) -9.0480 (0.5980) 1 (s.e.) 0.8657 (0.0408) 0.3450 (0.1010) 1.2765 (0.0357) 1.0666 (0.0602) 2 (s.e.) NA NA NA 0.3194 (0.0774) k 2.3 2.9 3.2 2.3 Model parameters f k f k f k f k Total 1.000 2.3 1.000 2.9 1.000 3.2 1.000 2.3 Fatal and injury 0.131 2.9 0.444 2.6 0.318 3.5 0.250 2.3 Daytime 0.598 1.9 0.570 2.6 0.618 2.7 0.652 2.4 Daytime fatal and injury 0.075 2.6 0.263 2.0 0.199 3.1 0.151 2.3 Nighttime 0.402 2.3 0.430 3.3 0.382 4.0 0.348 2.0 Nighttime fatal and injury 0.055 4.0 0.181 3.6 0.120 4.3 0.099 2.4 Dry 0.581 2.2 0.503 2.2 0.666 4.2 0.604 2.4 Wet 0.414 1.3 0.480 2.9 0.334 1.6 0.396 1.7 Guidance-related 0.221 1.6 0.017 0.9 0.476 3.0 0.606 2.0 1 Datafor Pennsylvania and Missouri are for one direction of travel only. AADT variable: for Pennsylvania both directions, for Missouri one-way volume only.

OCR for page 58
A-4 TABLE A-7 Pennsylvania four-lane freeways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1991 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.83 0.92 1992 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.83 0.92 1993 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.96 1.11 1.02 1994 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.96 1.11 1.02 1995 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.96 1.11 1.02 1996 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.96 1.11 1.02 1997 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.01 0.85 0.95 1998 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.01 0.85 0.95 1999 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.01 0.85 0.95 2000 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.01 0.85 0.95 TABLE A-8 New York four-lane freeways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1993 0.42 0.66 0.46 0.72 0.37 0.56 0.41 0.43 0.51 1994 0.46 0.71 0.46 0.66 0.46 0.79 0.44 0.47 0.31 1995 0.60 0.86 0.66 0.92 0.52 0.77 0.62 0.56 0.41 1996 0.66 0.95 0.65 0.87 0.67 1.06 0.58 0.73 0.91 1997 0.82 1.08 0.87 1.09 0.76 1.05 0.72 0.95 1.11 1998 PRPM Implementation Year 1999 1.04 0.66 0.99 0.66 1.11 0.67 1.15 0.94 0.50 2000 1.21 0.63 1.19 0.65 1.24 0.61 1.23 1.17 1.30 2001 1.42 0.76 1.37 0.86 1.48 0.63 0.78 2.09 1.21 TABLE A-9 Missouri four-lane freeway: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1991 0.86 0.94 0.81 0.90 0.94 0.99 0.87 0.84 0.91 1992 0.74 0.77 0.73 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.83 0.57 0.71 1993 0.97 0.95 0.93 0.90 1.04 1.03 0.90 1.11 1.01 1994 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.90 1.02 1.06 1.04 0.80 0.94 1995 0.93 0.89 0.89 0.85 0.99 0.94 0.97 0.86 0.90 1996 1.05 1.03 1.07 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.00 1.15 1.03 1997 1.01 1.07 1.05 1.12 0.95 0.97 0.98 1.08 1.08 1998 1.05 1.02 1.11 1.04 0.95 0.97 1.01 1.11 1.03 1999 1.11 1.07 1.27 1.25 0.86 0.76 1.07 1.20 1.02 2000 1.01 0.98 1.00 1.01 1.02 0.91 0.97 1.08 0.99 2001 0.95 0.87 1.01 0.93 0.86 0.76 0.92 1.02 0.94

OCR for page 59
A-5 TABLE A-10 Wisconsin four-lane freeway: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1994 0.73 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.82 0.68 0.72 0.75 0.95 1995 0.73 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.77 0.67 0.78 0.69 0.96 1996 0.95 1.02 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.12 0.85 1.09 1.04 1997 0.93 0.98 0.94 1.00 0.92 0.96 0.88 0.99 1.03 1998 0.90 0.86 0.97 0.89 0.80 0.83 1.00 0.75 0.89 2000 1.24 1.48 1.30 1.41 1.12 1.58 1.04 1.54 1.42 (Comparison Group 1) 2000 1.08 0.98 1.08 0.99 1.08 0.99 1.07 1.08 1.24 (Comparison Group 2) Comparison Group 1: based on 43 miles of comparison sites of four-lane freeways; Comparison Group 2: based on a sample of urban Interstate highway in Milwaukee County. TABLE A-11 Safety performance functions for four- lane divided expressways Model Form Pennsylvania1 Wisconsin 1 Crashes per Mile-yr (AADT/2) (AADT)1 ln() (s.e.) -11.40 (1.17) -3.47 (1.88) 1 (s.e.) 1.241 (0.122) 0.494 (0.199) 2 (s.e.) N/A N/A k 2.3 2.2 Model parameters f k f k Total 1.000 2.3 1.000 2.2 Fatal and injury 0.154 1.8 0.165 3.7 Daytime 0.625 2.3 0.691 1.6 Daytime fatal and injury 0.098 1.8 0.090 3.4 Nighttime 0.375 2.5 0.309 4.6 Nighttime fatal and injury 0.056 2.5 0.075 2.7 Dry 0.666 2.5 0.761 1.8 Wet 0.331 1.7 0.239 2.3 Guidance-related 0.094 0.8 0.634 3.1 1 Datafor Pennsylvania is for one direction of travel only. AADT is for both directions. TABLE A-12 Pennsylvania four-lane divided expressways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1991 0.76 0.86 0.78 0.82 0.72 0.93 0.75 0.77 0.88 1992 0.76 0.86 0.78 0.82 0.72 0.93 0.75 0.77 0.88 1993 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.58 0.68 0.63 1994 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.58 0.68 0.63 1995 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.58 0.68 0.63 1996 0.61 0.60 0.61 0.65 0.60 0.50 0.58 0.68 0.63 1997 0.72 0.62 0.68 0.54 0.78 0.76 0.81 0.54 0.49 1998 0.72 0.62 0.68 0.54 0.78 0.76 0.81 0.54 0.49 1999 0.72 0.62 0.68 0.54 0.78 0.76 0.81 0.54 0.49 2000 0.72 0.62 0.68 0.54 0.78 0.76 0.81 0.54 0.49

OCR for page 60
A-6 TABLE A-13 Wisconsin four-lane divided expressways: annual factors Annual Factors Total Fatal and Daytime Daytime Fatal Nighttime Nighttime Fatal Dry Wet Guidance-Related Injury and Injury and Injury 1994 0.77 0.65 0.69 0.64 0.95 0.67 0.81 0.65 1.05 1995 0.69 0.60 0.69 0.66 0.69 0.52 0.76 0.48 0.99 1996 1.00 1.10 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.29 0.98 1.08 0.89 1997 1.14 1.18 1.20 1.28 1.03 1.07 1.06 1.41 0.91 1998 1.28 1.35 1.31 1.35 1.23 1.35 1.29 1.27 1.05 1999 PRPM Implementation Year 2000 1.42 1.71 1.43 1.70 1.43 1.72 1.43 1.43 1.42