Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
64 REFERENCES 1. Federal Highway Administration, âPavement Preservation: A Road Map for the Future.â A forum held October 26â28, 1998, Report No. FHWA-SA-99-015, U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, Washington, DC (1999). 2. Federal Highway Administration, âPavement Management Analysis Multi-Year Prioritization.â Demonstration Project No. 108, Report No. FHWA-SA-97-071, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, Washington, DC (1996). 3. Coopers and Lybrand, and Opinion Research Corporation, âNational Highway User Survey.â (1996). 4. Dye Management Group, âMaintenance Management and Administration Evaluation.â Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation, Bellevue, WA (1996). 5. Survey Research Center, âSurvey of Licensed California Drivers Regarding Highway Maintenance Activities.â Execu- tive Summary. University Research Foundation, California State University, Chico, CA (1999). 6. Dye Management Group, âPublic Perceptions Report.â Pre- pared for Arizona Department of Transportationâs Customer- Oriented Level of Service Maintenance Management System, Phoenix, AZ (1998). 7. Foundation for Pavement Preservation, âPavement Preventive Maintenance Guidelines.â Foundation for Pavement Preserva- tion, Falls Church, VA (2001). 8. Arizona Department of Transportation, âArizonaâs Pavement Maintenance Experiment.â Unpublished Report, Phoenix, AZ (2000). 9. Jahren, C. K., Bergeson, K., Al-Hammadi, A, Celik, S., and Lau, G., âThin Maintenance Surfaces.â Phase One Report, Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (1999) 10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, âPavement Preservation in the United States: Sur- vey by the Lead States Team on Pavement Preservation,â http://leadstates.transportation.org/pp/survey/survey_report. pdf, (1999). 11. Michigan Department of Transportation, âCapital Preventive Maintenance Program Guidelines.â Maintenance Division, Lansing, MI (1999). 12. California Department of Transportation, âCapital Preventive Maintenance ProgramâGuidelinesâ dated June 20, 1999, in Cal- trans Pavement Preservation Program. Sacramento, CA (1999). 13. Peshkin, D. G., Smith, K. D., Zimmerman, K. A., and Geoffroy, D. N., âPavement Preservation: The Preventive Maintenance Concept.â FHWA Course 131054 Reference Manual. FHWA- HI-00-004, Federal Highway Administration/National Highway Institute, Washington, DC, (1999). 14. Seeds, S. B., Jackson, N. C., Peshkin, D. G., Smith, K. D., and Wade, M. J., âTechniques for Pavement Rehabilitation.â Sixth Edition, Federal Highway Administration/National Highway Institute, Washington, DC (1998). 15. American Concrete Pavement Association, The Concrete Pave- ment Restoration GuideâProcedures for Preserving Concrete Pavements. Technical Bulletin, Skokie, IL (1998). 16. Larson, R.M., Petersen, D., and Correa, A., Retrofit Load Transfer: Special Demonstration Project SP-204. Publication No. FHWA-SA-98-047, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (1998). 17. Morian, D., Epps, J., and Gibson, S., âPavement Treatment Effectiveness, 1995 SPS-3 and SPS-4 Site Evaluations, National Report.â Report No. FHWA-RD-96-208, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washing- ton, DC (1997). 18. Morian, D., Gibson, S., and Epps, J., âMaintaining Flexible PavementsâThe Long Term Pavement Performance Experi- ment. SPS-3 5-Year Data Analysis.â Report No. FHWA-RD-97- 102, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (1998). 19. Scofield, L. and Epps, J. âSurvey of Pavement Maintenance Practices in Arizona.â Draft Report, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, AZ (1999). 20. Freeman, T. J., âSupplemental Maintenance Effectiveness Research Program (SMERP).â Presentation at the AGC Pave- ment Preservation Seminar, October 4â5, Austin, TX (1999). 21. Syed, I. M., Freeman, T. J., and Smith, R. E., âEffectiveness of Highway Maintenance Treatments Used in Texas.â Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation and Maintenance, Special Technical Publication (STP) 1348, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA (1998). 22. Wade, M., DeSombre, R., and Peshkin, D., âHigh Volume/ High Speed Asphalt Roadway Preventive Maintenance Treat- ments.â Publication No. SD99-09, South Dakota Department of Transportation, Pierre, SD (2001). 23. Federal Highway Administration, âLife-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design.â Publication No. FHWA-SA-98-079, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (1998). 24. Texas Research and Development Incorporated Infrastructure and Systems Engineering, âEvaluation of Pavement Manage- ment, Rehabilitation Techniques and Materials, and Compari- son of Design Methods, Report No. 1, Volume I.â ADOT Proj- ect SPR-404, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, AZ (1999). 25. Texas Research and Development Incorporated Infrastructure and Systems Engineering, âEvaluation of Pavement Manage- ment, Rehabilitation Techniques and Materials, and Comparison of Design Methods, Report No. 1, Volume IIâAppendices.â ADOT Project SPR-404, Arizona Department of Transporta- tion, Phoenix, AZ (1999). 26. B. T. Bellner & Associates, âEffectiveness of the Capital Pre- ventive Maintenance Program.â Report prepared for MDOT, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI (2001). 27. Chatti, K. and Lee, D., Development of a Preventive Mainte- nance Strategy for Minimizing Roughness-Related Pavement Damage. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1769. TRB, The National Academies, Washington, DC (2001). 28. 2001 Road Oil Summary, NCDOT State Road Maintenance Unit, Raleigh, NC (2001). 29. North Carolina Department of Transportation, âStandard Spec- ifications for Roads and Structures.â Raleigh, NC (2002).