National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 523: Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Peshkin, D G, Zimmerman, K A, Hoerner, T E, Transportation Research Board. "References." NCHRP Report 523: Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
64
bottomleft bottomright
Page
64
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-3)
Problem Statement (4-4)
Research Approach (5-5)
Organization of the Report (6-6)
Overview of Preventive Maintenance (7-7)
Preventive Maintenance Treatments for Bituminous- and Concrete-Surfaced Pavements (8-8)
Treatment Attributes (9-9)
Characteristics of Selected Treatments (10-16)
Summary (17-17)
Pavement Performance (18-18)
Benefit Weighting Factors (19-20)
Cost Considerations (21-22)
Step 1: Analysis Session Setup (23-23)
Step 2: Selection of Benefit Cutoff Values (24-24)
Step 3: Computation of Areas Associated with the Do-Nothing Case (25-25)
Step 5: Computation of Expected Service Life of the Post-Treatment Case (26-26)
Step 6: Computation of Areas Associated with the Post-Treatment Case (27-30)
Step 8: Computation of Overall Benefit (31-31)
Step 9: Cost Computations (32-32)
Step 10: Determining the Most Cost-Effective Timing Scenario (33-34)
Built-In Flexibility (35-35)
Analysis Setup (36-36)
Case Study #1 - Arizona (37-41)
Case Study #2 - Kansas (42-49)
Case Study #3 - Michigan (50-54)
Case Study #4 - North Carolina (55-59)
Summary (60-61)
Treatment Performance and Do-Nothing Pavement Performance (62-62)
Suggestions for Additional Research, (63-63)
References (64-64)
Appendix C - User's Guide for the Optimal Preventive Maintenance Timing Analytical Tool (OPTime) (65-65)
Appendix D - Plan for Constructing and Monitoring Preventive Maintenance Test Sections (66-64)
Appendix E - Example Illustrating the Inclusion of Different Cost Types (65-75)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (76-76)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 64
64 REFERENCES 1. Federal Highway Administration, "Pavement Preservation: A 16. Larson, R.M., Petersen, D., and Correa, A., Retrofit Load Road Map for the Future." A forum held October 26­28, 1998, Transfer: Special Demonstration Project SP-204. Publication Report No. FHWA-SA-99-015, U.S. Department of Transporta- No. FHWA-SA-98-047, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. tion, Washington, DC (1999). Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (1998). 2. Federal Highway Administration, "Pavement Management 17. Morian, D., Epps, J., and Gibson, S., "Pavement Treatment Analysis Multi-Year Prioritization." Demonstration Project No. Effectiveness, 1995 SPS-3 and SPS-4 Site Evaluations, National 108, Report No. FHWA-SA-97-071, U.S. Department of Trans- Report." Report No. FHWA-RD-96-208, Federal Highway portation, Washington, DC (1996). Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washing- 3. Coopers and Lybrand, and Opinion Research Corporation, ton, DC (1997). "National Highway User Survey." (1996). 18. Morian, D., Gibson, S., and Epps, J., "Maintaining Flexible Pavements--The Long Term Pavement Performance Experi- 4. Dye Management Group, "Maintenance Management and ment. SPS-3 5-Year Data Analysis." Report No. FHWA-RD-97- Administration Evaluation." Prepared for Washington State 102, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Department of Transportation, Bellevue, WA (1996). Transportation, Washington, DC (1998). 5. Survey Research Center, "Survey of Licensed California 19. Scofield, L. and Epps, J. "Survey of Pavement Maintenance Drivers Regarding Highway Maintenance Activities." Execu- Practices in Arizona." Draft Report, Arizona Department of tive Summary. University Research Foundation, California Transportation, Phoenix, AZ (1999). State University, Chico, CA (1999). 20. Freeman, T. J., "Supplemental Maintenance Effectiveness 6. Dye Management Group, "Public Perceptions Report." Pre- Research Program (SMERP)." Presentation at the AGC Pave- pared for Arizona Department of Transportation's Customer- ment Preservation Seminar, October 4­5, Austin, TX (1999). Oriented Level of Service Maintenance Management System, 21. Syed, I. M., Freeman, T. J., and Smith, R. E., "Effectiveness of Phoenix, AZ (1998). Highway Maintenance Treatments Used in Texas." Flexible 7. Foundation for Pavement Preservation, "Pavement Preventive Pavement Rehabilitation and Maintenance, Special Technical Maintenance Guidelines." Foundation for Pavement Preserva- Publication (STP) 1348, American Society for Testing and tion, Falls Church, VA (2001). Materials, West Conshohocken, PA (1998). 8. Arizona Department of Transportation, "Arizona's Pavement 22. Wade, M., DeSombre, R., and Peshkin, D., "High Volume/ Maintenance Experiment." Unpublished Report, Phoenix, AZ High Speed Asphalt Roadway Preventive Maintenance Treat- (2000). ments." Publication No. SD99-09, South Dakota Department 9. Jahren, C. K., Bergeson, K., Al-Hammadi, A, Celik, S., and of Transportation, Pierre, SD (2001). Lau, G., "Thin Maintenance Surfaces." Phase One Report, 23. Federal Highway Administration, "Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State Pavement Design." Publication No. FHWA-SA-98-079, U.S. University, Ames, IA (1999) Department of Transportation, Washington, DC (1998). 10. American Association of State Highway and Transportation 24. Texas Research and Development Incorporated Infrastructure Officials, "Pavement Preservation in the United States: Sur- and Systems Engineering, "Evaluation of Pavement Manage- ment, Rehabilitation Techniques and Materials, and Compari- vey by the Lead States Team on Pavement Preservation," son of Design Methods, Report No. 1, Volume I." ADOT Proj- http://leadstates.transportation.org/pp/survey/survey_report. ect SPR-404, Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, pdf, (1999). AZ (1999). 11. Michigan Department of Transportation, "Capital Preventive 25. Texas Research and Development Incorporated Infrastructure Maintenance Program Guidelines." Maintenance Division, and Systems Engineering, "Evaluation of Pavement Manage- Lansing, MI (1999). ment, Rehabilitation Techniques and Materials, and Comparison 12. California Department of Transportation, "Capital Preventive of Design Methods, Report No. 1, Volume II--Appendices." Maintenance Program--Guidelines" dated June 20, 1999, in Cal- ADOT Project SPR-404, Arizona Department of Transporta- trans Pavement Preservation Program. Sacramento, CA (1999). tion, Phoenix, AZ (1999). 13. Peshkin, D. G., Smith, K. D., Zimmerman, K. A., and Geoffroy, 26. B. T. Bellner & Associates, "Effectiveness of the Capital Pre- D. N., "Pavement Preservation: The Preventive Maintenance ventive Maintenance Program." Report prepared for MDOT, Concept." FHWA Course 131054 Reference Manual. FHWA- Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI (2001). HI-00-004, Federal Highway Administration/National Highway 27. Chatti, K. and Lee, D., Development of a Preventive Mainte- Institute, Washington, DC, (1999). nance Strategy for Minimizing Roughness-Related Pavement 14. Seeds, S. B., Jackson, N. C., Peshkin, D. G., Smith, K. D., and Damage. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Wade, M. J., "Techniques for Pavement Rehabilitation." Sixth Transportation Research Board, No. 1769. TRB, The National Edition, Federal Highway Administration/National Highway Academies, Washington, DC (2001). Institute, Washington, DC (1998). 28. 2001 Road Oil Summary, NCDOT State Road Maintenance 15. American Concrete Pavement Association, The Concrete Pave- Unit, Raleigh, NC (2001). ment Restoration Guide--Procedures for Preserving Concrete 29. North Carolina Department of Transportation, "Standard Spec- Pavements. Technical Bulletin, Skokie, IL (1998). ifications for Roads and Structures." Raleigh, NC (2002).