National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 516: Pier and Contraction Scour in Cohesive Soils (2004)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Wang, J, Briaud, J-L, Li, Y, Chen, H-C, Nurtjahyo, P, Transportation Research Board. "Nomenclature." NCHRP Report 516: Pier and Contraction Scour in Cohesive Soils. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
116
bottomleft bottomright
Page
116
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-7)
1.4 Why Was This Problem Addressed? (8-8)
1.5 Approach Selected to Solve the Problem (9-9)
2.4 Erodibility and Correlation to Soil and Rock Properties (10-13)
3.3 EFA Test Data Reduction (14-14)
3.4 EFA Precision and Typical Results (15-16)
4.2 Small Flood Followed by Big Flood (17-17)
4.3 Big Flood Followed by Small Flood and General Case (18-18)
4.4 Hard Soil Layer Over Soft Soil Layer (19-20)
4.6 Equivalent Time (21-21)
4.7 Extended and Simple SRICOS-EFA Method (22-23)
4.8 Case Histories (24-25)
4.9 Predicted and Measured Local Scour for the Eight Bridges (26-28)
4.10 Conclusions (29-29)
5.4 Measuring Equipment (30-31)
5.5 Soils and Soil Bed Preparation (32-32)
5.6 Flume Tests: Procedure and Measurement (33-33)
5.8 Shallow Water Effect on Maximum Pier Scour Depth (34-35)
5.9 Shallow Water Effect on Initial Shear Stress (36-36)
5.11 Pier Spacing Effect on Maximum Scour Depth (37-37)
5.12 Pier Spacing Effect on Initial Scour Rate (38-38)
5.15 Pier Shape Effect on Initial Scour Rate (39-39)
5.18 Attack Angle Effect on Maximum Scour Depth (40-41)
5.20 Attack Angle Effect on Scour Hole Shape (42-42)
5.21 Maximum Scour Depth Equation for Complex Pier Scour (43-44)
6.2 Existing Knowledge on Numerical Simulations for Scour (45-45)
6.5 Shallow Water Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (46-46)
6.6 Shallow Water Effect on Maximum Shear Stress (47-47)
6.7 Pier Spacing Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (48-48)
6.9 Pier Shape Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (49-50)
6.10 Pier Shape Effect on Maximum Shear Stress (51-51)
6.11 Attack Angle Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (52-52)
6.12 Attack Angle Effect on Maximum Shear Stress (53-53)
6.13 Maximum Shear Stress Equation for Complex Pier Scour (54-55)
7.3 Flume Tests and Measurements (56-56)
7.4 Flume Tests: Flow Observations and Results (57-58)
7.5 Flume Tests: Scour Observations and Results (59-59)
7.6 Maximum and Uniform Contraction Depths for the Reference Cases (60-62)
7.7 Location of Maximum Contraction Depth for the Reference Cases (63-63)
7.8 Correction Factors for Transition Angle and Contraction Length (64-64)
7.9 SRICOS-EFA Method Using HEC-RAS Generated Velocity (65-65)
7.11 Scour Depth Equations for Contraction Scour (66-67)
8.3 Transition Angle Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (68-68)
8.4 Contracted Length Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (69-71)
8.6 Maximum Shear Stress Equation for Contraction Scour (72-75)
9.3 The Integrated SRICOS-EFA Method: Step-by-Step Procedure (76-80)
9.5 The SRICOS-EFA Program (81-83)
9.6 Output of the SRICOS-EFA Program (84-84)
10.4 Gill (1981) Database: Contraction Scour (85-87)
10.5 Remarks (88-88)
11.2 Preparation of the Future Hydrographs (89-89)
11.3 Risk Approach to Scour Predictions (90-90)
11.4 Observations on Current Risk Levels (91-92)
12.2 Example 2: Single Rectangular Pier with Attack Angle and Approaching Hydrograph (93-94)
12.3 Example 3: Group Rectangular Piers with Attack Angle and Approaching Constant Velocity (95-98)
12.4 Example 4: Contracted Channel with 90-Degree Transition Angle and Approaching Constant Velocity (99-102)
12.5 Example 5: Contracted Channel with 60-Degree Transition Angle and Approaching Hydrograph (103-104)
12.6 Example 6: Bridge with Group Piers and Contracted Channel with Hydrograph in Contracted Section (105-110)
13.1 Conclusions (111-112)
13.2 Recommendations, (113-113)
References (114-115)
Nomenclature (116-117)
Unit Conversions (118-118)
Appendix A - Photographs from the Flume Tests (119-125)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (126-126)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 116
116 NOMENCLATURE Pier attack angle Transition angle for bridge contraction Mass density of water Unit weight of water Roughness coefficient µQ Mean value of daily stream-flow Q Standard deviation of daily stream-flow #200 Percentage of soil passing No.200 sieve a Width of the cross section of the rectangular pipe in EFA b Length of the cross section of the rectangular pipe in EFA B Pier width B Pier projection width B1 Channel upstream width B2 Contracted channel width C Pier center-center spacing CEC Cation exchange capacity CSS Critical shear stress of soil d Scour depth, a random variable and its statistics can be studied in detail to determine the risk of failure asso- ciated with difference choices of the design value of the scour depth D50 Particle size f Friction factor obtained from Moody Chart Fr Froude number g Acceleration due to gravity h Length of soil sample eroded in EFA test H Average water depth upstream bridge piers H1 Average water depth in approaching flow upstream contraction H2 Average water depth in contracted channel HHec Initial average water depth in contracted channel calculated by HEC-RAS L Length of contraction channel Lpier Length of rectangular pier kw Correction factor of water depth for the initial shear stress of pier scour ksh Correction factor of pier shape effect for the initial shear stress of pier scour ksp Correction factor of pier spacing effect for the initial shear stress of pier scour k Correction factor of pier attack angle effect for the initial shear stress of pier scour kc-R Correction factor of contraction ratio effect for the initial shear stress of contraction scour kc-L Correction factor of contraction length effect for the initial shear stress of contraction scour kc-H Correction factor of flow water depth effect for the initial shear stress of contraction scour kc- Correction factor of transition angle effect for the initial shear stress of contraction scour Kw Correction factor of water depth for pier scour depth Ksh Correction factor of pier shape effect for pier scour depth Ksp Correction factor of pier spacing effect for pier scour K Correction factor of pier attack angle effect for pier scour depth KL Correction factor of contraction length effect for contraction scour depth K Correction factor of transition angle effect for contraction scour depth KL/Zmax Correction factor of contraction length effect for maximum contraction scour depth KL/unif Correction factor of contraction length effect for uniform contraction scour depth KL/Xmax Correction factor of contraction length effect for location of maximum contraction scour depth K/Zmax Correction factor of transition angle effect for maximum contraction scour depth K/unif Correction factor of transition angle effect for uniform contraction scour depth K/Xmax Correction factor of transition angle effect for location of maximum contraction scour Lt Life of structure n Manning's coefficient pH Log Scale Unit of Measure, and is used to express the degree of acidity of a substance. PI Plasticity index Q Daily stream-flow discharge

OCR for page 117
117 R Level of risk associated with the choice of different design values of scour depth and project lives Re Reynolds number = VB/v Rh Hydraulic radius S Piers center-center spacing SAR Sodium adsorption ratio Si Initial erodibility SU Undrained shear strength of soil t Time required for soil sample to be eroded in EFA test te Equilibrium time for multi-flood scour depth calculation Tr Return period in risk analysis Shear stress on the surface of soil sample c Critical shear stress of soil max Initial shear stress which also is the maximum value during shear stress history max(Deep) Initial shear stress which also is the maximum value during shear stress history for pier sour or contraction scour in deep water case max(Circle) Initial shear stress which also is the maximum value during shear stress history for pier sour or contraction scour in circular pier case max(0 degree) Initial shear stress which also is the maximum value during shear stress history for pier sour or contraction scour in no attack angle case max(Cont) Initial shear stress which also is the maximum value during shear stress history for contraction scour max(Single) Initial shear stress which also is the maximum value during shear stress history for pier sour or contraction scour in single pier case (z) Shear stress on the bottom of scour hole at depth z Kinematics viscosity of water V Approaching average velocity for pier scour V1 Approaching average velocity for contraction scour V2 Average velocity in the contracted channel VHEC Calculated velocity in the contracted channel by HEC-RAS Xa Location of maximum bed shear stress due to abutment Xc Location of maximum bed shear stress around pier or the abutment (most interested) Xmax Location of the maximum contraction scour Z Erosion rate i Z Initial erosion rate Zmax (Cont) Equilibrium maximum contraction scour depth Zmax (Deep) Equilibrium pier scour depth or equilibrium maximum contraction scour depth in deep water case Zunif(Cont) Equilibrium uniform contraction scour