National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 516: Pier and Contraction Scour in Cohesive Soils (2004)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Wang, J, Briaud, J-L, Li, Y, Chen, H-C, Nurtjahyo, P, Transportation Research Board. "5.5 Soils and Soil Bed Preparation." NCHRP Report 516: Pier and Contraction Scour in Cohesive Soils. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
32
bottomleft bottomright
Page
32
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-7)
1.4 Why Was This Problem Addressed? (8-8)
1.5 Approach Selected to Solve the Problem (9-9)
2.4 Erodibility and Correlation to Soil and Rock Properties (10-13)
3.3 EFA Test Data Reduction (14-14)
3.4 EFA Precision and Typical Results (15-16)
4.2 Small Flood Followed by Big Flood (17-17)
4.3 Big Flood Followed by Small Flood and General Case (18-18)
4.4 Hard Soil Layer Over Soft Soil Layer (19-20)
4.6 Equivalent Time (21-21)
4.7 Extended and Simple SRICOS-EFA Method (22-23)
4.8 Case Histories (24-25)
4.9 Predicted and Measured Local Scour for the Eight Bridges (26-28)
4.10 Conclusions (29-29)
5.4 Measuring Equipment (30-31)
5.5 Soils and Soil Bed Preparation (32-32)
5.6 Flume Tests: Procedure and Measurement (33-33)
5.8 Shallow Water Effect on Maximum Pier Scour Depth (34-35)
5.9 Shallow Water Effect on Initial Shear Stress (36-36)
5.11 Pier Spacing Effect on Maximum Scour Depth (37-37)
5.12 Pier Spacing Effect on Initial Scour Rate (38-38)
5.15 Pier Shape Effect on Initial Scour Rate (39-39)
5.18 Attack Angle Effect on Maximum Scour Depth (40-41)
5.20 Attack Angle Effect on Scour Hole Shape (42-42)
5.21 Maximum Scour Depth Equation for Complex Pier Scour (43-44)
6.2 Existing Knowledge on Numerical Simulations for Scour (45-45)
6.5 Shallow Water Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (46-46)
6.6 Shallow Water Effect on Maximum Shear Stress (47-47)
6.7 Pier Spacing Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (48-48)
6.9 Pier Shape Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (49-50)
6.10 Pier Shape Effect on Maximum Shear Stress (51-51)
6.11 Attack Angle Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (52-52)
6.12 Attack Angle Effect on Maximum Shear Stress (53-53)
6.13 Maximum Shear Stress Equation for Complex Pier Scour (54-55)
7.3 Flume Tests and Measurements (56-56)
7.4 Flume Tests: Flow Observations and Results (57-58)
7.5 Flume Tests: Scour Observations and Results (59-59)
7.6 Maximum and Uniform Contraction Depths for the Reference Cases (60-62)
7.7 Location of Maximum Contraction Depth for the Reference Cases (63-63)
7.8 Correction Factors for Transition Angle and Contraction Length (64-64)
7.9 SRICOS-EFA Method Using HEC-RAS Generated Velocity (65-65)
7.11 Scour Depth Equations for Contraction Scour (66-67)
8.3 Transition Angle Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (68-68)
8.4 Contracted Length Effect: Numerical Simulation Results (69-71)
8.6 Maximum Shear Stress Equation for Contraction Scour (72-75)
9.3 The Integrated SRICOS-EFA Method: Step-by-Step Procedure (76-80)
9.5 The SRICOS-EFA Program (81-83)
9.6 Output of the SRICOS-EFA Program (84-84)
10.4 Gill (1981) Database: Contraction Scour (85-87)
10.5 Remarks (88-88)
11.2 Preparation of the Future Hydrographs (89-89)
11.3 Risk Approach to Scour Predictions (90-90)
11.4 Observations on Current Risk Levels (91-92)
12.2 Example 2: Single Rectangular Pier with Attack Angle and Approaching Hydrograph (93-94)
12.3 Example 3: Group Rectangular Piers with Attack Angle and Approaching Constant Velocity (95-98)
12.4 Example 4: Contracted Channel with 90-Degree Transition Angle and Approaching Constant Velocity (99-102)
12.5 Example 5: Contracted Channel with 60-Degree Transition Angle and Approaching Hydrograph (103-104)
12.6 Example 6: Bridge with Group Piers and Contracted Channel with Hydrograph in Contracted Section (105-110)
13.1 Conclusions (111-112)
13.2 Recommendations, (113-113)
References (114-115)
Nomenclature (116-117)
Unit Conversions (118-118)
Appendix A - Photographs from the Flume Tests (119-125)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (126-126)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 32
32 61x61 Diameter =61mm 61x122 Diameter =160mm 61x244 61x366 61x488 Diameter =273mm 61x732 Figure 5.3. Pier models used in the complex pier scour tests. undisturbed by the presence of the probe. An ADV with a the water surface elevation, the water depth, and the change velocity range of ±2.5 m/s and a resolution of 0.1 mm/s was in scour depth. The point gage is designed based on the fact used to measure the velocity during the tests. The primary use that air, water, and soil have different electrical conductivity. of the ADV was to measure the vertical velocity profile along The point gage system forms a closed circuit with one node the water depth around piers and contractions. The upstream in the soil or water and the other one in the air. Once the point mean depth velocity was the basic velocity recorded for the gage, which contains a needle attached to a vertical ruler, pier tests. For the contraction tests, the ADV was used to mea- touches the interface between water and air or water and soil, sure the velocity distribution along the centerline of the con- there is a sudden conductivity change that can be read easily tracted channel at certain water depths before the scour on a voltmeter. When the water is dirty, the maximum scour started and after the scour stopped. In some tests, more exten- location can be searched point by point using the point gage. sive velocity measurements were conducted at specific loca- As shown in Figure 5.2, the point gage and ADV are tions. These included the corners of contraction abutments installed in a hanging measurement cage riding on a carriage and rectangular piers. that moves along the longitudinal direction of the flume. In the A point gage with a new design was used in this study. flume tests, it was found that the presence of piers or contrac- Without interrupting the experiments, it was used to measure tion abutments had almost no influence on the flow at a dis- tance of one channel width upstream of the obstacle. There- fore, the velocity and water depth were determined at this location for each test. In addition, a digital camera was used to record important phenomena during the tests. 5.5 SOILS AND SOIL BED PREPARATION A Porcelain clay was used as the primary soil; for compar- ison purposes, sands also were used in several tests. The pre- dominant mineral of this commercially available Porcelain (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) clay is Kaolinite. Geotechnical tests were conducted accord- ing to ASTM standards. The geotechnical properties of the Porcelain clay determined at two different times are summa- rized in Table 5.1. Vane shear tests were conducted at three different locations around the future scour hole after the soil Response Distance 50mm U (f) (g) (h) (i) V (a, b, c-Contraction Width; a, d, e, f-transition angle, a, g, h, i-contraction Flow Particle length) Figure 5.4. Abutment models for contraction scour tests. Figure 5.5. Diagram of the ADV.