Cover Image

Not for Sale

View/Hide Left Panel
Click for next page ( 61

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 60
60 Standardized Procedures for Personal Travel Surveys 4.2.14 S-5: Specification of Sampling Error Requirements Frequently, RFPs specify that the required sample must provide no more than, say, 10% error with 95% confidence in something such as a trip rate. Generally, this appears to be specified with little understanding of what it means. It would be reasonable to question whether 10% error is acceptable compared with 5% error and whether the significance level should be set to 90% or 95%. Also, the error is almost always specified for trip rates, while the data will be used for much more than trip-rate estimation. The implications of a particular error level for trip rates on esti- mation of such elements as mode choice or network volumes are largely unknown. The first issue that needs to be addressed is to determine an appropriate specification of the level of error and confidence level to be used in designing samples. This issue could be researched by using existing data sets. In this case, variations in data caused by differences in survey protocols, firms, survey instruments, etc., would be irrelevant. It may be most useful to present graphs show- ing the effects of changing each of the error levels and the confidence level so that the implications of each can be seen. This should, ideally, be done using actual computations of sampling error from recent surveys. The implications of the level of error can be investigated by examining simple trip- production models and showing the implications in terms of ability to distinguish statistically between the trip rates for different population sub-groups. The second issue is to determine the implications for other variables that may be estimated from the data of setting an error level on trip rates. To do this, one would need to select certain other variables of interest--the proportions of trips by mode and purpose, the average trip length by pur- pose, trip rates by purpose, average household size, average vehicle ownership, etc.--and estimate the sampling errors on these attributes. These would need to be related to the sampling errors for the overall trip rates to show how the sampling errors on the other attributes relate to the trip-rate sampling error. If there is insufficient variability in the overall error of trip rates, it may be neces- sary to sub-sample from some existing surveys since the sub-samples will have much larger sam- pling error for all characteristics. The third issue is to investigate the potential to use other attributes, such as mode shares, for the design sampling error. Existing data sets could be used to determine the error properties of such attributes as mode shares and possibly other attributes like average trip lengths by purpose. If the attribute on which the sampling error is specified is changed, then a different type of sam- pling will be required to achieve the desired sample. This would require investigation of what would be required and how it could be attained. Existing data sets could be used for this--for example, a secondary data source like Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) could be sampled to replicate the procedure that would need to be used. 4.2.15 S-6: Development of Default Variances Estimation of error requires an estimate of the variance of crucial variables. One of the issues that has made sampling strategies relatively simplistic in household travel surveys is the lack of information on variances for those variables that are normally considered crucial in transporta- tion planning analysis. This has implications on all aspects of sampling because the error levels are determined by the variance; hence, sample size and stratification procedures are also deter- mined by the variance. In the absence of information about the variance, survey designers either assume constant variances across all strata in a sampling scheme or make some other working assumption that will allow sample size calculations to be made. Default variances could be used to determine appropriate sample sizes and other issues in the absence of actual local data on these values. They could also be used subsequently to assist in