National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis Program (NCHRPSYN)

Citation Manager

Gransberg, D, James, DMB, Transportation Research Board. "Road Preparation." NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
40
bottomleft bottomright
Page
40
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-5)
Chip Seals as a Tool for Preventive Maintenance (6-8)
Regional Context (9-9)
Chip Seal - Art or Science? (10-10)
Chip Seal Terminology (11-11)
Chip Seal Design Methods (12-13)
Chip Seal Design Practices (14-17)
Chip Seal Design Conclusions and Best Practices (18-18)
Contract Management (19-20)
Risk and Warranties (21-21)
Contract Risk (22-22)
Warranties (23-23)
Contract Administration Conclusions and Best Practices (24-24)
Aggregate Selection (25-27)
Binder Selection (28-29)
Material Selection Conclusions and Best Practices (30-31)
Binder Distributor (32-33)
Aggregate (Chip) Spreader (34-34)
Rollers (35-35)
Unique Equipment (36-37)
Equipment Conclusions and Best Practices (38-38)
Weather (39-39)
Road Preparation (40-40)
Spraying Operations (41-42)
Aggregate Spreading (43-43)
Rolling Operations (44-46)
Sweeping and Brooming (47-47)
Construction Practices for High-Volume Traffic (48-48)
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (49-49)
Field Testing (50-52)
Construction Conclusions and Best Practices (53-54)
Engineering-Based Performance Indicators (55-55)
Qualitative Performance Indicators (56-58)
Performance Conclusions and Best Practices (59-59)
Common Characteristics of Excellent Chip Seal Programs (60-60)
Case Study Conclusions and Best Practices (61-63)
Suggestions for Future Research (64-65)
References (66-68)
Bibliography (69-69)
Glossary (70-72)
Appendix A - Chip Seal Synthesis Questionnaire (73-83)
Appendix B - Survey Responses (84-99)
Appendix C - Chip Seal Design Details (100-108)
Appendix D - Innovative Chip Seal Case Studies (109-110)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (111-111)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 40
41 can cause a chip seal project to fail. If an unexpected rainstorm preparation of a pavement surface for chip sealing (Asphalt ensues, sufficient aggregate should be spread to cover all of the Surface Treatments--Specifications undated): applied binder. If possible, the road should be closed to traffic and, if not, traffic must be kept to a minimum speed during this · Repair all holes and depressions and replace with a tight period, because adhesion between the binder and aggregate is surface conforming patch; at risk (Asphalt Seal Coats 2003). The amount of rolling · Fill and seal all cracks; should be reduced, if not completely ceased, while the aggre- · Level all bumps, waves, and corrugations that will gate is wet, because the binder may emerge from the voids and impair riding qualities; be picked up on the wheels of the roller (Bituminous Sprayed · Remove all excess asphalt on patches and joints; and Surfacing Manual 2003). · Clean full width of the surface to be treated. Wind Repairs Chip sealing during windy conditions raises a number of Significant deficiencies in the pavement surface must be issues. Wind can be either beneficial or detrimental to a chip repaired before applying a chip seal to the roadway. Potholes seal during construction. The benefits of wind are directed must be filled, and ruts of significant depths must be leveled. toward the curing process for emulsions, because wind may The survey analysis revealed that the most common repair speed up this process and thus allow for earlier sweeping and activities to be completed before a chip seal are hot-mix and opening to traffic (Gransberg et al. 1998). The destructive cold-mix patching and crack sealing. In addition to prevent- nature of wind is noted during the application of the binder. ing water from entering the base, crack seals prevent loss of Wind can distort spray patterns, which may lead to a non- chip seal binder through existing cracks, and patches are uniform application (Asphalt Seal Coats 2003). A shield may intended primarily to level up the pavement surface as well as be installed on the distributor to prevent any disturbance to address isolated pavement distresses. The type of material the spray pattern from wind (Seal Coat . . . 2003). used for the various repairs is important and can affect the quality and overall longevity of the finished chip seal surface. ROAD PREPARATION Patching materials and crack sealant need time to cure before placing a chip seal. This work, when possible, needs to be pro- Preparation activities before the chip seal work are essential grammed and scheduled to take place several months in to produce a uniform surface, because most chip seal activ- advance of the chip seal construction to allow for crack ities are applied on pavements that show various distresses. sealant and paving materials to cure (Sprayed Sealing Guide A pavement that is well prepared for chip sealing should 2004). As a rule of thumb, patching should be completed at have a uniformly textured surface and a smooth ride, and it least 6 months before construction and crack sealing should should contain only those minor defects that can be corrected be applied at least 3 months before the application of chip by the chip seal. Figure 42 shows the results of the survey seals (Gransberg et al. 1998). Road Note 39, the United responses for this area. The following are requirements for Kingdom's chip seal design and construction policy manual, Texturizing Patch and Level Fog Coat Crack Sealing Fresh Pavement 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% North America AU, NZ, UK, SA FIGURE 42 Typical road preparation methods.