National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis Program (NCHRPSYN)

Citation Manager

Gransberg, D, James, DMB, Transportation Research Board. "Quality Assurance and Quality Control." NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
49
bottomleft bottomright
Page
49
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-5)
Chip Seals as a Tool for Preventive Maintenance (6-8)
Regional Context (9-9)
Chip Seal - Art or Science? (10-10)
Chip Seal Terminology (11-11)
Chip Seal Design Methods (12-13)
Chip Seal Design Practices (14-17)
Chip Seal Design Conclusions and Best Practices (18-18)
Contract Management (19-20)
Risk and Warranties (21-21)
Contract Risk (22-22)
Warranties (23-23)
Contract Administration Conclusions and Best Practices (24-24)
Aggregate Selection (25-27)
Binder Selection (28-29)
Material Selection Conclusions and Best Practices (30-31)
Binder Distributor (32-33)
Aggregate (Chip) Spreader (34-34)
Rollers (35-35)
Unique Equipment (36-37)
Equipment Conclusions and Best Practices (38-38)
Weather (39-39)
Road Preparation (40-40)
Spraying Operations (41-42)
Aggregate Spreading (43-43)
Rolling Operations (44-46)
Sweeping and Brooming (47-47)
Construction Practices for High-Volume Traffic (48-48)
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (49-49)
Field Testing (50-52)
Construction Conclusions and Best Practices (53-54)
Engineering-Based Performance Indicators (55-55)
Qualitative Performance Indicators (56-58)
Performance Conclusions and Best Practices (59-59)
Common Characteristics of Excellent Chip Seal Programs (60-60)
Case Study Conclusions and Best Practices (61-63)
Suggestions for Future Research (64-65)
References (66-68)
Bibliography (69-69)
Glossary (70-72)
Appendix A - Chip Seal Synthesis Questionnaire (73-83)
Appendix B - Survey Responses (84-99)
Appendix C - Chip Seal Design Details (100-108)
Appendix D - Innovative Chip Seal Case Studies (109-110)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (111-111)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 49
50 equipment tires are swept from the pavement surface before This synthesis subscribes to the definitions of QC and opening to traffic. In cases where chip seals fail after a period quality assurance (QA) recommended by TRB (1999). As of months owing either to loss of aggregate or flushing, the such, QA is the "planned and systematic actions necessary to problems may be caused by materials, design, or construction provide confidence that a product or facility will perform (Shuler 1991). satisfactorily in service." Additionally, QC is defined as the "quality assurance actions and considerations necessary to Figures 53 and 54 summarize chip seal construction prac- assess production and construction processes so as to control tices. Their intent is to present this information in a compara- the level of quality being produced in the end product." Both tive manner where it can be easily understood and applied. terms are inherent in all of the best practices identified in this synthesis. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL Special attention was directed toward identifying labora- The success of a chip seal is highly associated with the con- tory and field tests that can be correlated with successful trol implemented over the quality of materials and con- chip sealing practice. The QC section of the survey empha- struction. Constructability reviews during planning, design, sized the requirements that respondents use for ensuring and construction phases improve the quality of only the final conformance of the materials and the construction operation product. The QC measures widely implemented intended to the contract specifications. Table 11 is an indication of for chip seal projects are provided by material testing and some specific chip seal testing methodologies that were ver- inspection forces. ified in the literature review. FIGURE 53 Preventive maintenance chip seal construction practices (adapted from Peshkin et al. 1999).