National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis Program (NCHRPSYN)

Citation Manager

Gransberg, D, James, DMB, Transportation Research Board. "Bibliography." NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
69
bottomleft bottomright
Page
69
Front Matter (R1-R9)
Summary (1-5)
Chip Seals as a Tool for Preventive Maintenance (6-8)
Regional Context (9-9)
Chip Seal - Art or Science? (10-10)
Chip Seal Terminology (11-11)
Chip Seal Design Methods (12-13)
Chip Seal Design Practices (14-17)
Chip Seal Design Conclusions and Best Practices (18-18)
Contract Management (19-20)
Risk and Warranties (21-21)
Contract Risk (22-22)
Warranties (23-23)
Contract Administration Conclusions and Best Practices (24-24)
Aggregate Selection (25-27)
Binder Selection (28-29)
Material Selection Conclusions and Best Practices (30-31)
Binder Distributor (32-33)
Aggregate (Chip) Spreader (34-34)
Rollers (35-35)
Unique Equipment (36-37)
Equipment Conclusions and Best Practices (38-38)
Weather (39-39)
Road Preparation (40-40)
Spraying Operations (41-42)
Aggregate Spreading (43-43)
Rolling Operations (44-46)
Sweeping and Brooming (47-47)
Construction Practices for High-Volume Traffic (48-48)
Quality Assurance and Quality Control (49-49)
Field Testing (50-52)
Construction Conclusions and Best Practices (53-54)
Engineering-Based Performance Indicators (55-55)
Qualitative Performance Indicators (56-58)
Performance Conclusions and Best Practices (59-59)
Common Characteristics of Excellent Chip Seal Programs (60-60)
Case Study Conclusions and Best Practices (61-63)
Suggestions for Future Research (64-65)
References (66-68)
Bibliography (69-69)
Glossary (70-72)
Appendix A - Chip Seal Synthesis Questionnaire (73-83)
Appendix B - Survey Responses (84-99)
Appendix C - Chip Seal Design Details (100-108)
Appendix D - Innovative Chip Seal Case Studies (109-110)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (111-111)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 69
70 BIBLIOGRAPHY Anderson, S.D. and D.J. Fisher, NCHRP Report 390: Con- Hicks, R.G. and J.A. Epps, "Life Cycle Cost Analysis of structability Review Process for Transportation Facilities, Asphalt­Rubber Paving Materials," Proceedings of Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- Asphalt Rubber--2000, Rubber Pavements Association, cil, Washington, D.C., 96 pp. Tempe, Ariz., 2000, pp. 569­590. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Bituminous Huang, Y.H., Pavement Analysis and Design, Prentice­Hall, Surface Treatments for Newly Constructed Rural Roads, Inc., Edgewood Cliffs, N.J., 1993, pp. 546­582. Technical Recommendations for Highways, TRH 3, Kearby, J.P., Tests and Theories on Penetration Surfaces, National Institute for Road Research, Pretoria, South Vol. 32, Highway Research Board, National Research Africa, 1971. Council, Washington, D.C., 1953. Garcia-Diaz, A. and F. Cediel-Franco, "Evaluation of In- Walls, J. and M.R. Smith, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pave- House Maintenance Contract Costs for Guardrail, Rest ment Design--Interim Technical Bulletin, FHWA-SA-98- Areas, Pavement Marker, Striping, and Seal Coats," Texas 079, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College 1998, pp. 7­28. Station, 1988, 81 pp.