National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Conference Proceedings 33: Transportation Finance: Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow (2005)
Technical Activities Division (TAD)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Legislative." Conference Proceedings 33: Transportation Finance: Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
15
bottomleft bottomright
Page
15
Transportation Finance Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow (1-1)
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2005 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* (2-6)
CONFERENCE PROGRAM (7-7)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (8-8)
Contents (9-12)
COMMON THEMES AND KEY OBSERVATIONS (13-13)
Underlying Framework and Trends (14-14)
Legislative (15-15)
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING FUTURE RESEARCH (16-16)
ASSESSMENT OF THE CONFERENCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE EVENTS (17-18)
PRECONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (19-19)
Track 3: Structures, Institutions, and Partnerships to Deliver More Projects Faster and Cheaper (20-20)
Track 4: New Transportation Initiatives and Demands on Financing (21-22)
General Sessions (23-24)
WELCOME AND CHARGE (25-25)
Track 2: Tools and Techniques to Deliver More Projects Faster (26-26)
Track 4: New Transportation Initiatives and Demands on Financing (27-27)
LUNCHEON SESSION Transportation Challenges to the Nation (28-29)
TRACK 2: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO DELIVER MORE PROJECTS FASTER (30-30)
TRACK 4: NEW TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES AND DEMANDS ON FINANCING (31-31)
LEVERAGING FEDERAL FUNDING (32-32)
COMMENTS (33-33)
TRACK 2: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO DELIVER MORE PROJECTS FASTER (34-34)
TRACK 4: NEW TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES AND DEMANDS ON FINANCING (35-35)
GENERAL SESSION 4 Transportation Finance in the Context of Reauthorization and Beyond Administration's Perspective (36-36)
REAUTHORIZATION AND FINANCING (37-37)
OPEN DISCUSSION (38-38)
ARTBA'S PERSPECTIVE (39-39)
FOCUSING ON THE SYSTEM (40-40)
Track Reports (41-42)
What Could Be: Looking Ahead to Alternative Fuels, Taxes, and Other Revenue Sources (43-43)
Considering Transportation Finance Approaches Used by Other Governments (44-44)
SESSION 2: EXAMINING CURRENT AND POTENTIAL USE OF TAX INCENTIVES IN PROMOTING SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT (45-45)
Tax Credit Bonds to Finance Infrastructure: Theory and Practice (46-46)
Discussion (47-47)
Making Room for Maintenance: The Intelligent Renewal of Our Existing Transportation System (48-48)
Opportunities for Value Capture and Value Pricing (49-49)
Discussion (50-50)
Integrating Innovate Financing into the Transportation Planning Process (51-51)
SESSION 2: INNOVATIVE FINANCING TO ADVANCE STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS (52-52)
Discussion (53-53)
Freight Infrastructure Bank Proposal (54-54)
Communicating Innovative Finance to the Public (55-55)
Discussion (56-56)
Setting the Stage: Public-Sector Perspective on Roles and Risk Sharing (57-57)
Las Vegas Monorail (58-58)
Virginia's Privatization Initiative: Outcome-Based Highway Asset Management (59-59)
New Mexico (60-60)
Discussion (61-61)
Financing Intermodal Connections: Bringing Down the Funding Silos for the I-95 Rail Study (62-62)
Short-Line Rail: Private Investments in the Marine Transportation System (63-63)
Discussion (64-64)
Discussion (65-66)
TRACK 1 (67-67)
TRACK 4 (68-70)
Resource Papers (71-72)
WHAT SHOULD BE THE GOAL OF REAUTHORIZATION? (73-73)
HAS TEA-21 MET THE GOALS OF MAINTAINING SYSTEM CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE AND IMPROVING SAFETY? (74-74)
WHAT FUNDING LEVEL WILL REAUTHORIZATION NEED TO ESTABLISH TO MAINTAIN CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE? (75-75)
Enhancements to the Fuel Excise Tax (76-76)
Tax Credit Bonds (77-77)
Tolling (78-79)
CONCLUSION (80-80)
INNOVATIVE FINANCE FRAMEWORK (81-81)
IMPEDIMENTS TO PROJECT DELIVERY (82-82)
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS (83-83)
POLITICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS (84-85)
EXPEDITING PROJECT DELIVERY: A CHALLENGE TO THE TRANSPORTATION FINANCE COMMUNITY (86-86)
What Is This Strategy Intended to Accomplish? (87-87)
What Is This Strategy Intended to Accomplish? (88-88)
Where Is This Strategy Leading Us? (89-89)
State Departments of Transportation Caught in the Middle (90-90)
Local Resistance to Innovative Finance Initiatives (91-91)
BACKGROUND (92-92)
TECHNOLOGY (93-94)
IMPLICATIONS (95-96)
Acronyms (97-97)
Conference Steering Committee Member Biographies (98-103)
Participants (104-111)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 15
C O M M I T T E E F I N D I N G S A N D R E C O M M E N D AT I O N S 3 interplay with finance to provide the public with the tools. To date, the primary focus of innovative finance information required to judge overall performance best. initiatives has been on new construction. · Budget cuts and personnel caps, along with key · Accompanying these shifts in focus is a heightened members of the transportation workforce reaching emphasis on the need for training, education, and con- retirement age, are depleting state DOT workforces. tinued information exchange on the application of the This reduction in in-house expertise is occurring at the full range of available finance techniques and assess- same time that potential reductions in federal assistance ment of their appropriateness to specific situations. require transportation agencies to spend smarter to This assessment includes consideration of who will bear continue improving services. the costs associated with the various approaches. Costs · These staff reductions, achieved substantially to be considered include the social, fiscal, economic, through early retirement programs, are accelerating a and environmental costs as well as the associated risks shift in the senior management of state DOTs. One posi- of employing alternative financing approaches. tive aspect of this change has been a shift in organiza- tional culture toward management of transportation assets as an integrated system and application of newer RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING management disciplines to this end. Continuation of POLICY-RELATED ISSUES these trends is an important factor in cultivating expanded openness to alternative approaches and reap- The conference committee developed a set of recom- ing the maximum benefit from the transportation system. mendations focused on policy-related issues, some · Many observers feel that budgetary firewalls, fund- entailing possible legislative and administrative changes. ing guarantees, and related policies such as the revenue- Following is a summary of these recommendations. aligned budget authority (RABA) in TEA-21, which strive to ensure that all transportation funding sources are used on transportation investments, have collectively General worked well. · In the near term, identify ways to use alternative funding sources to begin to lessen the reliance on fuel tax Possible New Directions revenues. Such approaches could focus on application of the beneficiary-pay principle and broader definition of Following is a set of possible new directions that were dis- beneficiaries than in current user-pay approaches, as well cussed at the conference and that inform the committee's as on generating funding from existing transportation recommendations offered later in this section. assets and injecting the discipline of equity investing on the part of the public sector. · Many participants noted that an important oppor- · To begin addressing longer-term needs, explore tunity exists to apply concepts of traditional public options to address the shifting challenges for trans- finance to the funding challenge and thus to move portation funding and to identify alternatives to fuel beyond the application of what they view as an inade- taxes as well as financial tools needed to deploy new quate and incomplete user-pay approach to incorporate a funding approaches over the long term. broader beneficiary-pay principle. Some also noted that · Encourage transportation stakeholders to seek the transportation community, policy makers, and the more flexibility in making use of available finance tools. public could benefit by gaining a better understanding of Such broad support will likely be critical in achieving the social and distributional implications of the various expanded eligibilities and new finance tools. tax choices as well as how best to capture the value of the existing system to generate funding. Concern was raised about the increasing reliance on sales tax mechanisms Legislative that are generally regressive and that incorporate neither a user-pay nor a direct beneficiary-pay approach. · Consider alternative funding mechanisms. A variety · The focus is shifting from developing new financ- of options were discussed at the conference. Following are ing techniques to addressing how best to apply these some potential alternative funding mechanisms and techniques in the most appropriate ways and in securing adjustments to existing mechanisms considered: refinements to enhance their role in meeting transporta- ­Indexing the gas tax to maintain its purchasing tion investment challenges and ultimately improving the power. nation's quality of life. An incipient parallel shift is ­Addressing the problem of fuel tax evasion. requiring the inclusion of rehabilitation and preserva- ­Facilitating private-sector investment in surface tion needs in the development of any new financing transportation infrastructure.