National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Conference Proceedings 33: Transportation Finance: Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow (2005)
Technical Activities Division (TAD)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "CONCLUSION." Conference Proceedings 33: Transportation Finance: Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
80
bottomleft bottomright
Page
80
Transportation Finance Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow (1-1)
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2005 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* (2-6)
CONFERENCE PROGRAM (7-7)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (8-8)
Contents (9-12)
COMMON THEMES AND KEY OBSERVATIONS (13-13)
Underlying Framework and Trends (14-14)
Legislative (15-15)
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING FUTURE RESEARCH (16-16)
ASSESSMENT OF THE CONFERENCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE EVENTS (17-18)
PRECONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (19-19)
Track 3: Structures, Institutions, and Partnerships to Deliver More Projects Faster and Cheaper (20-20)
Track 4: New Transportation Initiatives and Demands on Financing (21-22)
General Sessions (23-24)
WELCOME AND CHARGE (25-25)
Track 2: Tools and Techniques to Deliver More Projects Faster (26-26)
Track 4: New Transportation Initiatives and Demands on Financing (27-27)
LUNCHEON SESSION Transportation Challenges to the Nation (28-29)
TRACK 2: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO DELIVER MORE PROJECTS FASTER (30-30)
TRACK 4: NEW TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES AND DEMANDS ON FINANCING (31-31)
LEVERAGING FEDERAL FUNDING (32-32)
COMMENTS (33-33)
TRACK 2: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO DELIVER MORE PROJECTS FASTER (34-34)
TRACK 4: NEW TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES AND DEMANDS ON FINANCING (35-35)
GENERAL SESSION 4 Transportation Finance in the Context of Reauthorization and Beyond Administration's Perspective (36-36)
REAUTHORIZATION AND FINANCING (37-37)
OPEN DISCUSSION (38-38)
ARTBA'S PERSPECTIVE (39-39)
FOCUSING ON THE SYSTEM (40-40)
Track Reports (41-42)
What Could Be: Looking Ahead to Alternative Fuels, Taxes, and Other Revenue Sources (43-43)
Considering Transportation Finance Approaches Used by Other Governments (44-44)
SESSION 2: EXAMINING CURRENT AND POTENTIAL USE OF TAX INCENTIVES IN PROMOTING SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT (45-45)
Tax Credit Bonds to Finance Infrastructure: Theory and Practice (46-46)
Discussion (47-47)
Making Room for Maintenance: The Intelligent Renewal of Our Existing Transportation System (48-48)
Opportunities for Value Capture and Value Pricing (49-49)
Discussion (50-50)
Integrating Innovate Financing into the Transportation Planning Process (51-51)
SESSION 2: INNOVATIVE FINANCING TO ADVANCE STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS (52-52)
Discussion (53-53)
Freight Infrastructure Bank Proposal (54-54)
Communicating Innovative Finance to the Public (55-55)
Discussion (56-56)
Setting the Stage: Public-Sector Perspective on Roles and Risk Sharing (57-57)
Las Vegas Monorail (58-58)
Virginia's Privatization Initiative: Outcome-Based Highway Asset Management (59-59)
New Mexico (60-60)
Discussion (61-61)
Financing Intermodal Connections: Bringing Down the Funding Silos for the I-95 Rail Study (62-62)
Short-Line Rail: Private Investments in the Marine Transportation System (63-63)
Discussion (64-64)
Discussion (65-66)
TRACK 1 (67-67)
TRACK 4 (68-70)
Resource Papers (71-72)
WHAT SHOULD BE THE GOAL OF REAUTHORIZATION? (73-73)
HAS TEA-21 MET THE GOALS OF MAINTAINING SYSTEM CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE AND IMPROVING SAFETY? (74-74)
WHAT FUNDING LEVEL WILL REAUTHORIZATION NEED TO ESTABLISH TO MAINTAIN CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE? (75-75)
Enhancements to the Fuel Excise Tax (76-76)
Tax Credit Bonds (77-77)
Tolling (78-79)
CONCLUSION (80-80)
INNOVATIVE FINANCE FRAMEWORK (81-81)
IMPEDIMENTS TO PROJECT DELIVERY (82-82)
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS (83-83)
POLITICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS (84-85)
EXPEDITING PROJECT DELIVERY: A CHALLENGE TO THE TRANSPORTATION FINANCE COMMUNITY (86-86)
What Is This Strategy Intended to Accomplish? (87-87)
What Is This Strategy Intended to Accomplish? (88-88)
Where Is This Strategy Leading Us? (89-89)
State Departments of Transportation Caught in the Middle (90-90)
Local Resistance to Innovative Finance Initiatives (91-91)
BACKGROUND (92-92)
TECHNOLOGY (93-94)
IMPLICATIONS (95-96)
Acronyms (97-97)
Conference Steering Committee Member Biographies (98-103)
Participants (104-111)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 80
68 T R A N S P O RTAT I O N F I N A N C E securing state leadership and local acceptance sufficient CONCLUSION to "sell" tolling for new projects. · We should not force policy makers to choose While FHWA, AASHTO, and ARTBA may quibble between tax-exempt financing on the one hand or pri- about how to calculate the exact cost of maintaining sys- vate-sector innovation and equity on the other. My tem condition and performance, they would all agree on partner, Karen J. Hedlund, has written an excellent certain key findings. Despite significant increases in fund- piece on this issue,22 and she will be speaking later in ing at all levels of government since 1997, we are not the conference about it. covering the cost of maintaining system performance. As · Federal policy should provide states and regional a result, congestion is increasing. authorities with a greater incentive to create new toll This conference has a unique opportunity to send a clear revenues than the existing toll credit mechanism, akin message--that the goal of reauthorization must be to avoid to the original state infrastructure bank program. this degradation in critical mobility for goods and people. Access to a small amount of new grant funds will pro- Achieving this standard will require difficult decisions by vide much-needed support for making politically diffi- elected and appointed officials at all levels of government: cult decisions. federal gas tax revenue enhancement, continued and wider · TIFIA is worthy of reauthorization.23 Nevertheless, use of innovative financing tools, and more extensive use of existing and prospective borrowers have suggested a tolling and planning for alternative dedicated funding to number of revisions, and TIFIA supporters will need to supplement the gas tax by 2010, among many others. respond thoughtfully to those resisting funding TIFIA The prospect of maintaining system performance "off the top" when it has proved difficult to estimate may not yet be "gone with the wind," but it is certainly, annual program demand. in Bob Dylan's words, "blowing in the wind." 22 Hedlund, K. J. The Case for Tax-Exempt Financing of Public­Private Partnerships. Reason Public Policy Institute, 1998. 23 Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act: Report to Congress. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.