National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Conference Proceedings 33: Transportation Finance: Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow (2005)
Technical Activities Division (TAD)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "INNOVATIVE FINANCE FRAMEWORK." Conference Proceedings 33: Transportation Finance: Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
81
bottomleft bottomright
Page
81
Transportation Finance Meeting the Funding Challenge Today, Shaping Policies for Tomorrow (1-1)
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2005 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* (2-6)
CONFERENCE PROGRAM (7-7)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS (8-8)
Contents (9-12)
COMMON THEMES AND KEY OBSERVATIONS (13-13)
Underlying Framework and Trends (14-14)
Legislative (15-15)
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING FUTURE RESEARCH (16-16)
ASSESSMENT OF THE CONFERENCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE EVENTS (17-18)
PRECONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (19-19)
Track 3: Structures, Institutions, and Partnerships to Deliver More Projects Faster and Cheaper (20-20)
Track 4: New Transportation Initiatives and Demands on Financing (21-22)
General Sessions (23-24)
WELCOME AND CHARGE (25-25)
Track 2: Tools and Techniques to Deliver More Projects Faster (26-26)
Track 4: New Transportation Initiatives and Demands on Financing (27-27)
LUNCHEON SESSION Transportation Challenges to the Nation (28-29)
TRACK 2: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO DELIVER MORE PROJECTS FASTER (30-30)
TRACK 4: NEW TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES AND DEMANDS ON FINANCING (31-31)
LEVERAGING FEDERAL FUNDING (32-32)
COMMENTS (33-33)
TRACK 2: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES TO DELIVER MORE PROJECTS FASTER (34-34)
TRACK 4: NEW TRANSPORTATION INITIATIVES AND DEMANDS ON FINANCING (35-35)
GENERAL SESSION 4 Transportation Finance in the Context of Reauthorization and Beyond Administration's Perspective (36-36)
REAUTHORIZATION AND FINANCING (37-37)
OPEN DISCUSSION (38-38)
ARTBA'S PERSPECTIVE (39-39)
FOCUSING ON THE SYSTEM (40-40)
Track Reports (41-42)
What Could Be: Looking Ahead to Alternative Fuels, Taxes, and Other Revenue Sources (43-43)
Considering Transportation Finance Approaches Used by Other Governments (44-44)
SESSION 2: EXAMINING CURRENT AND POTENTIAL USE OF TAX INCENTIVES IN PROMOTING SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT (45-45)
Tax Credit Bonds to Finance Infrastructure: Theory and Practice (46-46)
Discussion (47-47)
Making Room for Maintenance: The Intelligent Renewal of Our Existing Transportation System (48-48)
Opportunities for Value Capture and Value Pricing (49-49)
Discussion (50-50)
Integrating Innovate Financing into the Transportation Planning Process (51-51)
SESSION 2: INNOVATIVE FINANCING TO ADVANCE STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS (52-52)
Discussion (53-53)
Freight Infrastructure Bank Proposal (54-54)
Communicating Innovative Finance to the Public (55-55)
Discussion (56-56)
Setting the Stage: Public-Sector Perspective on Roles and Risk Sharing (57-57)
Las Vegas Monorail (58-58)
Virginia's Privatization Initiative: Outcome-Based Highway Asset Management (59-59)
New Mexico (60-60)
Discussion (61-61)
Financing Intermodal Connections: Bringing Down the Funding Silos for the I-95 Rail Study (62-62)
Short-Line Rail: Private Investments in the Marine Transportation System (63-63)
Discussion (64-64)
Discussion (65-66)
TRACK 1 (67-67)
TRACK 4 (68-70)
Resource Papers (71-72)
WHAT SHOULD BE THE GOAL OF REAUTHORIZATION? (73-73)
HAS TEA-21 MET THE GOALS OF MAINTAINING SYSTEM CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE AND IMPROVING SAFETY? (74-74)
WHAT FUNDING LEVEL WILL REAUTHORIZATION NEED TO ESTABLISH TO MAINTAIN CONDITION AND PERFORMANCE? (75-75)
Enhancements to the Fuel Excise Tax (76-76)
Tax Credit Bonds (77-77)
Tolling (78-79)
CONCLUSION (80-80)
INNOVATIVE FINANCE FRAMEWORK (81-81)
IMPEDIMENTS TO PROJECT DELIVERY (82-82)
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS (83-83)
POLITICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS (84-85)
EXPEDITING PROJECT DELIVERY: A CHALLENGE TO THE TRANSPORTATION FINANCE COMMUNITY (86-86)
What Is This Strategy Intended to Accomplish? (87-87)
What Is This Strategy Intended to Accomplish? (88-88)
Where Is This Strategy Leading Us? (89-89)
State Departments of Transportation Caught in the Middle (90-90)
Local Resistance to Innovative Finance Initiatives (91-91)
BACKGROUND (92-92)
TECHNOLOGY (93-94)
IMPLICATIONS (95-96)
Acronyms (97-97)
Conference Steering Committee Member Biographies (98-103)
Participants (104-111)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 81
RESOURCE PAPER Accelerating Project Development Approaches and Techniques for Expedient Project Delivery Sharon Greene, Sharon Greene and Associates Michael Schneider, PB Consult D espite a number of recently developed tools and refers to moving the traditional federal-aid transporta- techniques for innovative financing of surface tion process from a single strategy of federal funding on transportation projects, relatively few such pro- a "grants reimbursement" basis to a diversified jects have experienced substantial acceleration in actual approach that includes innovative financing concepts delivery to the public. States, municipalities, and special- developed from both the public and the private sectors. purpose authorities have used new methods to leverage As is well known to conference participants, the federal traditional sources of funds, which in many cases have government has traditionally financed transportation allowed the delivery of projects that would have had to infrastructure primarily through outright 80 percent wait for pay-as-you-go financing. However, the value of grants. With the Intermodal Surface Transportation such innovation in the more rapid delivery of trans- Efficiency Act of 1991, the National Highway System portation projects is often lost because of factors that Designation Act of 1995, and the Transportation Equity substantially inhibit their effective use. Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), the U.S. Department The purpose of this resource paper is to encourage of Transportation (USDOT) began providing alternative and stimulate discussion about methods by which more or "innovative" forms of nongrant assistance, as well as projects may be delivered more expediently. Not surpris- means by which the traditional federal grants process ingly, many nonfinancial factors interact in project deliv- could be made more flexible. This definition conveys a ery, which in combination reduce the value of new rather large playing field for innovation, which encom- methods for generating and utilizing funds for capital passes virtually all programs that utilize borrowing, project development. This paper will explore such factors guarantees, and other means of leveraging funds. By this and their relationship to innovative finance, with the definition, a significant number of transportation pro- principal objective of defining more effective approaches jects in the past 12 to 15 years have taken advantage of for consideration in the "Next TEA" reauthorization innovative financing. Many are now in operation; oth- process. Succinctly stated, the full value of innovations in ers are in the final stages of development, environmental financing methods for surface transportation programs clearance, and preliminary and final design. will only be realized when they are paired with compan- As paraphrased by the U.S. General Accounting ion innovations in the project definition, development, Office in its September 25, 2002, testimony before the approval, and implementation processes. Committee on Finance and the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the goals for the FHWA Innovative Finance Program are as follows:1 INNOVATIVE FINANCE FRAMEWORK 1 Statement of JayEtta Z. Hecker, Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues, United States General Accounting Office, testimony before the According to the Federal Highway Administration Senate Committee on Finance and the Committee on Environment (FHWA), "innovative finance" is a broad term that and Public Works, Sept. 25, 2002. 69