National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 539: Aggregate Properties and the Performance of Superpave-Designed Hot-Mix Asphalt (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "2.7.2 Aggregate Tests Related to Weathering and Freeze-Thaw Durability." NCHRP Report 539: Aggregate Properties and the Performance of Superpave-Designed Hot-Mix Asphalt. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
48
bottomleft bottomright
Page
48
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-11)
1.1 Introduction (12-12)
1.3 Scope (13-13)
2.2.1 Background (14-14)
2.2.2 Relationship Between Percent Coarse Aggregate Fractured Faces and Performance (15-15)
2.2.4 Alternative Methods of Measuring Coarse Aggregate Angularity (16-17)
2.2.5 Summary of Research Related to Coarse Aggregate Angularity (18-18)
2.3.2 Relationship Between F&E and Performance (19-21)
2.3.3 Precision of F&E Tests (22-22)
2.3.4 Summary of Research Related to F&E (23-23)
2.4.2 Uncompacted Voids Content in Fine Aggregate (24-24)
2.4.3 Alternative Methods of Measuring FAA (25-25)
2.4.4 Relationships Between Fine Aggregate Shape, Angularity, and Texture and HMA Performance (26-33)
2.4.6 Summary of Findings on Fine Aggregate Texture and Angularity (34-34)
2.5.2 Video Imaging Systems (35-36)
2.5.3 Image Analysis (37-38)
2.6.4 Methylene Blue Test (39-39)
2.6.6 Net Adsorption Test (40-40)
2.6.8 Summary of Aggregate Tests Related to Moisture Damage (41-41)
2.7.1 Aggregate Tests Related to Abrasion Resistance and Breakdown (42-47)
2.7.2 Aggregate Tests Related to Weathering and Freeze-Thaw Durability (48-48)
2.7.4 Summary of Tests Related to Aggregate Durability (49-49)
2.8.1 Methods for Analyzing Gradations (50-50)
2.8.2 Effect of the Restricted Zone on HMA Performance (51-51)
2.9.1 Research on Fines and Fillers (52-54)
2.10 Effect of Crushing Operations on Aggregate Properties (55-55)
2.10.1 Types of Crushers (56-56)
2.10.2 Factors Affecting Aggregate Shape (57-57)
2.10.4 Influence of Shape on Performance (58-59)
3.2.2 Fine Aggregate Angularity (60-61)
3.2.3 Coarse Aggregate Angularity (62-62)
3.3.1 Introduction (63-63)
3.3.3 Sulfate Soundness (64-64)
3.4.2 Aggregate Specific Gravity (65-65)
3.5 Summary of Agency Specification Survey (66-66)
4.3 WesTrack (67-68)
4.4.1 Effect of Gradation (69-69)
4.4.2 Relationship Between Aggregate Properties and Performance (70-70)
4.5 Summary of Data from In-Service Pavements and Accelerated Load Facilities (71-71)
5.2.1 Laboratory Evaluation (72-72)
5.3.3 Field Evaluation (73-73)
6.1.3 Fine Aggregate Angularity (74-74)
6.4 Aggregate Production (75-75)
6.5 Long-Term Pavement Studies and Accelerated Testing (76-76)
References (77-84)
Glossary (85-85)
Appendix - NCHRP Project 9-35 Aggregate Specification Survey (86-90)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (91-91)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 48
48 45 40 35 30 Micro Deval Value 25 y = 0.5392x + 7.8803 R2 = 0.7646 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 MgSO4 Soundness, % Figure 15. Relationship between magnesium sulfate soundness and micro-deval loss (2, 23). type. A micro-deval abrasion loss of 25% was proposed for The sample is then sieved by hand over a smaller sieve Oklahoma. appropriate for the size fraction. For 9.5-mm to 19.0-mm aggregates, the sample is sieved over an 8-mm (5/16-in.) sieve. The weighted average percent passing the smaller sieve sizes 2.7.2 Aggregate Tests Related to Weathering expressed as a percentage of the original sample weight is the and Freeze-Thaw Durability sulfate soundness loss. As discussed previously, there is a There is some question as to whether aggregates used in reasonable correlation between magnesium sulfate sound- HMA need to be resistant to freezing and thawing. Sound- ness and micro-deval loss. The relationship is fair to poor for ness tests such as magnesium or sodium sulfate soundness sodium sulfate soundness (2, 118). have commonly been used to assess degradation from freez- Currently, equipment is available to perform actual freeze- ing and thawing as well as from wetting and drying. Sulfate thaw testing. AASHTO T103, "Soundness of Aggregates by soundness tests were developed in the early 19th century to Freezing and Thawing," describes three procedures to con- simulate the expansion of water within stone that resulted duct freeze-thaw testing. A sample is initially washed and from freezing and thawing water (117). However, it has pre- dried to a constant mass, after which it is sieved into size frac- viously been shown that the magnesium sulfate soundness tions. The three procedures for immersion and freezing are test is correlated with micro-deval loss. This may indicate summarized in Table 11. The ethyl alcohol used in Procedure that the magnesium soundness test better simulates the slak- B is to aid the penetration of water. After the final cycle of ing caused by wetting and drying rather than freeze-thaw freezing and thawing, the samples are dried to a constant mass deterioration. and are sieved. The resulting weighted average loss for each To perform the sulfate soundness test (AASHTO T104), a size fraction is the soundness loss. Iowa, Ontario, and Michi- graded sample of coarse aggregate is prepared based on the gan currently use test methods for freeze-thaw testing. NMAS of the aggregate being tested. A graded fine aggregate Senior and Rogers (115) investigated the use of the uncon- sample is prepared with at least 100 g of material retained on fined freeze-thaw test that is similar to AASHTO T103 for each of the 4.75-mm, 2.36-mm, 1.18-mm, 0.600-mm, and coarse aggregates. Individual size fractions retained on the 0.300-mm sieves. The sample is soaked in a saturated solu- 13.2-mm, 9.5-mm, and 4.75-mm sieves are placed in separate tion of sodium of magnesium sulfate for 16 to 18 h. The sam- 1-liter jars. The samples are soaked for 24 h in a 3% NaCl ples are then briefly drained and dried in a 110°C oven to a solution. The samples are drained and sealed, frozen for 16 h, constant mass. Upon rewetting, the sulfate crystals expand in and then thawed at room temperature for 8 h. The freezing- the aggregate pores, simulating the expansion of water upon and-thawing cycle is repeated five times after which the sam- freezing. The cycle of wetting and drying is typically repeated ples are dried and sieved similar to AASHTO T103. Testing five times. After the final cycle, the sample is rinsed to remove by Senior and Rogers (115) suggests that the Ontario Uncon- the sulfate solution and dried at 110°C to a constant mass. fined Freeze-Thaw test is "to be preferred because it shows