National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 539: Aggregate Properties and the Performance of Superpave-Designed Hot-Mix Asphalt (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "6.4 Aggregate Production." NCHRP Report 539: Aggregate Properties and the Performance of Superpave-Designed Hot-Mix Asphalt. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
75
bottomleft bottomright
Page
75
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-11)
1.1 Introduction (12-12)
1.3 Scope (13-13)
2.2.1 Background (14-14)
2.2.2 Relationship Between Percent Coarse Aggregate Fractured Faces and Performance (15-15)
2.2.4 Alternative Methods of Measuring Coarse Aggregate Angularity (16-17)
2.2.5 Summary of Research Related to Coarse Aggregate Angularity (18-18)
2.3.2 Relationship Between F&E and Performance (19-21)
2.3.3 Precision of F&E Tests (22-22)
2.3.4 Summary of Research Related to F&E (23-23)
2.4.2 Uncompacted Voids Content in Fine Aggregate (24-24)
2.4.3 Alternative Methods of Measuring FAA (25-25)
2.4.4 Relationships Between Fine Aggregate Shape, Angularity, and Texture and HMA Performance (26-33)
2.4.6 Summary of Findings on Fine Aggregate Texture and Angularity (34-34)
2.5.2 Video Imaging Systems (35-36)
2.5.3 Image Analysis (37-38)
2.6.4 Methylene Blue Test (39-39)
2.6.6 Net Adsorption Test (40-40)
2.6.8 Summary of Aggregate Tests Related to Moisture Damage (41-41)
2.7.1 Aggregate Tests Related to Abrasion Resistance and Breakdown (42-47)
2.7.2 Aggregate Tests Related to Weathering and Freeze-Thaw Durability (48-48)
2.7.4 Summary of Tests Related to Aggregate Durability (49-49)
2.8.1 Methods for Analyzing Gradations (50-50)
2.8.2 Effect of the Restricted Zone on HMA Performance (51-51)
2.9.1 Research on Fines and Fillers (52-54)
2.10 Effect of Crushing Operations on Aggregate Properties (55-55)
2.10.1 Types of Crushers (56-56)
2.10.2 Factors Affecting Aggregate Shape (57-57)
2.10.4 Influence of Shape on Performance (58-59)
3.2.2 Fine Aggregate Angularity (60-61)
3.2.3 Coarse Aggregate Angularity (62-62)
3.3.1 Introduction (63-63)
3.3.3 Sulfate Soundness (64-64)
3.4.2 Aggregate Specific Gravity (65-65)
3.5 Summary of Agency Specification Survey (66-66)
4.3 WesTrack (67-68)
4.4.1 Effect of Gradation (69-69)
4.4.2 Relationship Between Aggregate Properties and Performance (70-70)
4.5 Summary of Data from In-Service Pavements and Accelerated Load Facilities (71-71)
5.2.1 Laboratory Evaluation (72-72)
5.3.3 Field Evaluation (73-73)
6.1.3 Fine Aggregate Angularity (74-74)
6.4 Aggregate Production (75-75)
6.5 Long-Term Pavement Studies and Accelerated Testing (76-76)
References (77-84)
Glossary (85-85)
Appendix - NCHRP Project 9-35 Aggregate Specification Survey (86-90)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (91-91)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 75
75 that passes the 4.75-mm (No. 4) sieve and is retained on appears to be no relationship between LA abrasion and the 2.36-mm (No. 8 sieve). It does not appear that any long-term abrasion or wear of the pavement surface. of the current consensus property tests can be used to · LA abrasion is specified by 96% of responding agencies. address this size fraction. · A maximum LA abrasion loss of 40% is the most com- · Uncompacted voids in fine aggregate, AASHTO T304, mon specification level. appears to be a reasonable screening test for fine aggre- gate blends. Numerous other tests have been investi- gated, but to date none consistently show a better rela- 6.2.2 Sulfate Soundness tionship with performance. · Of agencies that specify AASHTO T304 or an equiva- The research revealed the following about sulfate soundness: lent, 51% have adopted the specification criteria recom- mended for the Superpave mix design system; 21% of · Of the responding agencies, 66% specify sodium sul- state agencies specify more stringent criteria. fate soundness and 31% specify magnesium sulfate · There are materials with uncompacted voids contents in soundness. the range of 43% to 45% that test as false negatives. · A maximum sodium sulfate soundness loss of 12% is These materials have a demonstrated history of field specified by the majority of the agencies using that performance under high traffic even though they do not procedure. meet the uncompacted voids content specifications for · Magnesium sulfate soundness loss and micro-deval abra- high traffic. sion loss are highly correlated. The micro-deval test is · Research should be conducted to relate the CAR test to also related to abrasion of particles in the pavement. the rutting performance of HMA. Borderline aggregates · The micro-deval test is more precise than the sulfate that fail the current fine aggregate uncompacted void soundness tests. content specifications for high traffic but that provide · The micro-deval test should replace sulfate soundness good performance should be investigated in-depth as test for measuring aggregates' resistance to abrasion, wet- part of this study. ting and drying, and slaking. Research may need to be · Of state agencies, 46% continue to limit natural sand conducted to identify specifications for specific aggre- content by specifications. Limits between 10% and 15% gate types, similar to those used by Ontario. are most common. · States prone to freeze-thaw cycles should consider a freeze-thaw test, such as AASHTO T103, in addition to the micro-deval abrasion loss 6.1.4 Sand Equivalent No recent research has been able to corroborate the rela- 6.3 GRADATION tionship between clay-like particles, identified by the sand equivalent test, and moisture damage in the laboratory. How- The restricted zone--included in the original Superpave ever, the phenomenon that produces this type of failure may mix design system--was demonstrated to be unnecessary. It be difficult to duplicate in the laboratory. has been removed from most current Superpave specifications. The methylene blue value appears to be a better indicator Accelerated testing at the 2000 NCAT Test Track indicates of harmful clays in fine aggregate than is the sand equivalent no difference in the rutting performance of coarse-graded ver- test. There is concern by some agencies that the test is not sus fine-graded Superpave mixtures. suitable for routine specifications. 6.4 AGGREGATE PRODUCTION 6.2 SOURCE PROPERTIES Following are the conclusions reached regarding source Following are the conclusions reached regarding source properties: properties. · In addition to crusher type, aggregate particle shape can be improved by 6.2.1 LA Abrasion ­ Running the crusher with a full or choked feed cavity to promote interparticle crushing. The research revealed the following about LA abrasion: ­ Operating crushers in closed circuits where a recircu- lating feed can be used to fill the crusher cavity. · LA abrasion is related to aggregate breakdown during ­ Reducing the reduction ratio, reducing the feed size, handling, mixing, placement, and compaction. There or increasing the circulating load.