Managing Archaeological Investigations (2005)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

37 1. “Environmental Streamlining and NEPA: A History,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/ strmlng/es3history.htm [2004, June 4]. 2. “Environmental Streamlining, FHWA’s Vital Few Envi- ronmental Goals,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://environment. fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/vfovervw.htm [2004, June 5]. 3. Klein, T. and M. Naber, “Cultural Resources,” Conference Proceedings 28: Environmental Research Needs in Trans- portation, Transportation Research Board, National Re- search Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 55–63. 4. Environmental Streamlining, State Streamlining Prac- tices, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://environment.fhwa.dot. gov/strmlng/es6stateprac.asp [2004, June 4]. 5. Little, B.J., “Keeping Up with the Past: Updating Guid- ance for Archaeological Best Practices,” CRM, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2001, pp. 21–24. 6. Treatment of Archeological Properties: A Handbook, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1980. 7. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation, 48 FR 44716, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., 1983. 8. Little, B., E.M. Seibert, J. Townsend, J.H. Sprinkle Jr., and J. Knoerl, National Register Bulletin: Guidelines for Evaluating and Registering Archeological Properties, History and Education, National Register, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., 2000. 9. Altschul, J.H., “Significance in American Cultural Resource Management: Lost in the Past,” in Heritage of Value, Archaeology of Renown: Reshaping Archaeolog- ical Assessment and Significance, C. Mathers, T. Darvill, and B. Little, Eds., University Press of Florida, Gaines- ville, 2005, 339 pp. 10. King, T.F., Thinking About Cultural Resource Manage- ment: Essays from the Edge, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, Calif., 2002, 200 pp. 11. King, T.F., Cultural Resource Laws and Practice: An Introductory Guide, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, Calif., 1998, 256 pp. 12. Klein, T.H., “Archaeology and the Evaluation of Signif- icance,” in Transportation Research Circular Number E-C055: National Forum on Assessing Historic Signifi- cance for Transportation Programs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 2003, pp. 27–33. 13. URS Corporation, Review and Improvement of Existing Processes and Procedures for Evaluating Cultural Resource Significance, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2002. 14. “Working with Section 106—Section 106 Regulations Users Guide,” Advisory Council on Historic Preserva- tion, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www. achp.gov/usersguide.html [2004, Sep. 27]. 15. “NEPA Project Development—Environment and Planning—FHWA,” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://environment. fhwa.dot.gov/projdev/index.htm [2004, Nov. 4]. 16. “How Well Do We Work Together? Results from the Gallup Study,” Success in Streamlining, Monthly Newsletter, May 2004 [Online]. Available: http:// environment.fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/newsletters/may04nl. htm [2004, June 4]. 17. “Programmatic Agreement Tool Kit for State Depart- ments of Transportation Environmental Projects and Program,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Center for Environmental Excellence, Washington, D.C. [Online] Available: http:// www.environment.transportation.org/center_products_ programs/programmatic_agreement_toolkit/index.html [2004, June 14]. 18. “Tribal Consultation,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Center for Envi- ronmental Excellence, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.environment.transportation.org/ environmental_issues/tribal_consultation/overview.htm [2004, June 18]. 19. Lewis, A.H., Ed., Highway to the Past: The Archaeology of Boston’s Big Dig, William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth, Chairman, Massachusetts His- torical Commission, Boston, Mass., 2001. 20. Robinson, F.W., An Introduction to Vermont Archaeol- ogy: Native American Archaeological Sites and the Chit- tenden County Circumferential Highway, University of Vermont Consulting Archaeology, Burlington, 2003. 21. “Kids Dig Reed: Reed Farmstead Archaeological Site,” West Virginia Department of Transportation, Charleston [Online]. Available: http://www.kidsdigreed.com [2004, June 14]. 22. Delegation of Federal Environmental Responsibilities for Highway Projects, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2002 [Online]. Available: http://environment. fhwa.dot.gov/strmlng/delreport.htm [2002, Aug. 8]. 23. “Statewide Section 106 Programmatic Agreements: A Streamlining Initiative,” Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// environment.fhwa.dot.gov/histpres/section1.htm [2004, Nov. 1]. REFERENCES

24. “The Archaeological Curation Crisis: An Integrated Action Plan for the SAA and Its Partners,” Submitted by the Society for American Archaeology Advisory Com- mittee on Curation to the Society for American Archae- ology Board of Directors, Society for American Archae- ology, Washington, D.C., Mar. 2003. 25. “The Vermont State Historic Preservation Office’s Guidelines for Conducting Archaeology in Vermont: Working Draft,” 2002 [Online]. Available: http://efotg. nrcs.usda.gov/references/public/VT/guidelines_for_ conducting_arch.pdf [2004, June 21]. 26. Hudak, G.J. and E. Hobbs, “Mn/Model: A Statewide Archaeological Predictive Model for Minnesota,” Min- nesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, nd. 27. Environmental Services, Inc., North Carolina Archaeo- logical Predictive Modeling Project: Results of Task 1, Cabarrus, Chatham, Forsyth, Granville, Guilford, Ran- dolph, and Wake Counties, T.I.P. Number E-4602, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Sep. 2003. 28. Altschul, J.H., L. Sebastian, and K. Heidelberg, Predic- tive Modeling in the Military: Similar Goals, Divergent Paths, Preservation Research Series 1, SRI Foundation, Rio Rancho, N.M., 2004. 29. A Preliminary Reconnaissance Survey of the Delaware Bend Area and an Assessment of Archaeological Resources Impacted by the DEF-CR134-2.414 (PID 15741) Bridge Replacement Project in Delaware Town- 38 ship, Defiance County, Ohio, Cultural Resources Unit, Bureau of Environmental Services, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Oct. 1997. 30. Abbot, J.T., Houston Area Geoarcheology: A Frame- work for Archeological Investigation, Interpretation, and Cultural Resource Management in the Houston Highway District, Report 27, Archeological Studies Pro- gram, Environmental Affairs Division, Texas Depart- ment of Transportation, Austin, 2001. 31. Blair, L.M. and M. Fuller-Murillo, Rock Circles of Southern Nevada and Adjacent Portions of the Mohave Desert, Cultural Resources Section, Environmental Ser- vices Division, Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, July 1997. 32. Clay, R.B., “The Place of Geophysical Survey in Con- temporary Fieldwork,” Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., Lexington, Ky., 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www. crai-ky.com/services/geophysical/wheredow.html [2004, May 5]. 33. Patch, S.M., E.A. Duff, R.M. Thorne, J.E. Ehrenhard, and C.O. Braley, A Preservation and Stabilization Plan for Battery Hamilton (CH953), Chatham County, Geor- gia, Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, Apr. 29, 2003, 12 pp. 34. Braley, C.O., Archeological and Historical Investiga- tions at Battery Hamilton (9CH953), Chatham County, Georgia, Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, Jan. 15, 2003, 51 pp.