National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

TCRP Synthesis 60: Practices in No-Show and Late Cancellation Policies for ADA Paratransit (2005)
Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis Program (TCRPSYNTH)

Citation Manager

Mathias, Rosemary G, Transportation Research Board. "Policy Implementation." TCRP Synthesis 60: Practices in No-Show and Late Cancellation Policies for ADA Paratransit. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
33
bottomleft bottomright
Page
33

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 33
33 ­ Identify the cost of not establishing and enforcing · Include as much automation as possible for collecting a no-show/late cancellation policy to determine the information and generating notices to passengers about benefits that will be realized. apparent no-shows on a regular--perhaps daily--basis. ­ Be sure staff keeps current and is able to educate passengers about the no-show policies. POLICY CONTENT The following possible features of no-show/late cancella- POLICY IMPLEMENTATION tion policy content may assist transit agencies when devel- oping and reviewing their own policies. The following possible features of no-show/late cancella- tion policy implementation may assist transit agencies · Incorporate a reasonable sanction for customers com- when developing and reviewing their own policies. mensurate with the level of the no-show infraction. ­ Consider what length of suspension appears to be · Measure customer satisfaction of both those who fair given the population served and the incidence could benefit by the reduction in the number of no- of the no-shows and/or late cancellations. shows and late cancellations by the fellow customers ­ Note that ADA regulations do not specify fines and and of those who have incurred excessive late can- other financial penalties as a remedy for excessive cellations and no-shows. passenger no-shows. ­ Make reasonable policy adjustments based on ­ FTA has indicated that it is not appropriate to pub- feedback from customers. lish a restrictive no-show policy even if it is not · Continue passenger education and outreach efforts. enforced. ­ Use door hangers to notify customers of a no-show. · Include incentive programs such as free ride coupons ­ Educate by means of passenger brochures, bul- for passengers with exemplary records (e.g., passen- gers who have zero no-shows during a 6-month letins, and newsletters. period). ­ Pay particular attention to educating new cus- · Develop a manual of internal operating procedures tomers who may not understand the issue of no- for handling no-shows and late cancellations. shows and late cancellations. ­ Record operating procedures particularly with · Acquire technologies that will expedite the collection respect to dispatch and drivers on how to declare of accurate information and produce reports that an apparent passenger no-show (based on wait facilitate analysis. time, scheduled pick-up time versus actual arrival ­ Acquire computer-assisted or automated schedul- time, and so on). ing and dispatching. ­ Include detailed directions for contacting passengers. ­ Use MDTs, AVLs, and other technologies. ­ Use positive not demeaning language. ­ Incorporate IVR and accessible on-line access to · Include a written procedure for determining excused trip reservations, confirmations, and cancellations. no-shows based on consistently applied criteria. ­ Employ smart cards for data collection and track- ­ Communicate that procedure to passengers. ing passenger use of the system. · Do not automatically cancel subsequent trips on the · Identify alternative ways for passengers to notify the same day as an apparent passenger no-show. transit agency about late cancellations, particularly ­ Establish a procedure for determining whether the after hours. remaining trips will be taken. ­ Answering machine. ­ Establish an internal procedure for identifying and ­ Accessible on-line trip management. handling those trips. ­ IVR. · Develop an appeals process that is consistent with ADA · Develop a means to collect good documentation regulatory requirements as described previously. based on a reliable, consistent method of recording ­ Allow passengers to continue to use the service no-shows and late cancellations. during the appeals process. ­ Ensure that drivers accurately record their times ­ Provide an independent review board, such as the and locations in the event of an apparent passenger eligibility appeals board. no-show. · Establish a way to monitor no-shows and late cancel- ­ Ensure that late cancellations are handled quickly lations on an on-going basis and to impose suspen- and efficiently to give the dispatcher time to make sions at the appropriate time. real-time schedule adjustments. ­ Use a software vendor's no-show/passenger sus- ­ Encourage dispatchers to actively manage their pension module. drivers, particularly if they have access to AVL ­ Or create your own customized no-show/passenger and MDTs, which allow for dynamic dispatching suspension module. throughout the day.