National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 525 Volume 6: Guide for Emergency Transportation Operations (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Strategy 1: Develop Interagency Preparations for Complete Array of Incidents and Emergencies." NCHRP Report 525 Volume 6: Guide for Emergency Transportation Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
26
bottomleft bottomright
Page
26
Front Matter (R1-R10)
The Call to Action (1-1)
The Challenges (2-2)
A Serious Commitment to ETO (3-3)
Self-Assessment Against Best Practice (4-4)
The Importance of Executive Leadership (5-5)
The Guide (6-7)
Driving Forces (8-13)
Technology (14-14)
Institutions (15-16)
Basic Improvement Strategies (17-19)
The Bottom Line: Degree and Type of Change Needed (20-21)
The Guidance Framework (22-22)
The Institutions and Leadership Self-Assessment (23-24)
The Institutions and Leadership Guidance (25-25)
Strategy 1: Develop Interagency Preparations for Complete Array of Incidents and Emergencies (26-26)
Strategy 2: Establish Formal Program with Senior Responsibility, Organization, and Reporting (27-27)
Strategy 3: Allocate Adequate Resources (28-28)
Strategy 4: Establish Objectives with Related Performance Measures and Accountability (29-29)
Strategy 5: Develop Agency Policy, Laws, and Regulations (30-30)
Improvement Strategies as Part of Agency Strategic Planning and Programming (31-31)
Moving Forward - the Importance of Executive Leadership (32-32)
The Operations and Technology Self-Assessment and Guidance (33-33)
Strategy 1: Make Hazard-Specific/Proactive Preparations (34-36)
Strategy 2: Develop and Implement Coordinated Protocols, Procedures, and Training (37-39)
Strategy 3: Deploy Advanced Technology/Equipment (40-42)
Strategy 4: Measure/Benchmark Performance Against Best Practice (43-45)
Moving Forward - Ideal State of the Practice for ETO (46-46)
Operations - State of the Practice (47-48)
Operations - Strengths and Weaknesses (49-50)
Technology - Strengths and Weaknesses (51-52)
Institutions - State of the Practice (53-53)
Institutions - Strengths and Weaknesses (54-56)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (57-57)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 26
GUIDE FOR EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS STRATEGY 1: DEVELOP INTERAGENCY PREPARATIONS FOR COMPLETE ARRAY OF INCIDENTS AND EMERGENCIES Preparation for the broad array of potential incidents and emergencies requires a range of actions appropriate to the situation (see Table 4). Traffic incidents, law enforcement, and HAZMAT, disaster, and security events invoke various authorities and require a range of process responses drawing on different combinations of expertise from the emergency response community. State DOTs play varying roles from central to periph- eral across this array of emergencies. Even when the emergency does not involve high- ways directly, it is likely that emergency response and access will utilize highway assets. Table 4. Tactics for Institutions and Leadership Strategy 1 Location in Tactics Agency Planning Develop Relationships with State/Regional Emergency Management Strategic planning Agencies (EMA) (offline as senior · Develop liaison with state/regional EMAs and clarify DOT emergency management support functions for complete array of relevant incidents and interagency emergencies. relationships) · Develop communications networks and protocols among state DOTs, public safety agencies, and the state and regional emergency management Statewide program agencies. planning · Develop DOT operations plans with appropriate internal plans, response protocols, and procedures for mobilizing personnel and equipment. Carry District planning out this activity in close coordination with public safety agencies that are likely to have incident command responsibilities during emergencies. · Ensure appropriate district-level relationships with regional EMAs and public safety agencies. Develop Relationships with State/Federal Security Entities Strategic planning · Develop formal interagency relationships and communications networks (offline as senior and protocols among state DOTs and the security entities, including management secure routings for classified information. interagency · Working with the state coordinator for terrorism and security-related relationships) threats, develop appropriate response on department-wide and district basis to the Homeland Security Advisory System (HSAS) for terrorist threat levels. Familiarize Other State Agencies with DOT Capabilities Strategic planning · Discuss with other state agencies with both emergency and security (management responsibilities the utilization of state DOT TMC-based and interagency communications resources for multi-agency purposes. relationships) Develop Joint Interagency Strategy Plans and Coordinated Resourcing Strategic planning · Develop coordinated strategic plans and budgets for ETO among (management transportation and public safety agencies so that each agency can carry interagency out its respective role and responsibility with assurance that all roles will relationships be fulfilled. · Look for joint resourcing opportunities regarding funding from state and federal sources. Readiness to Advance DOT understands its role across the wide range of traffic incidents and other emergency operations responsibilities. DOT has clear relationships with the other emergency responders in command positions that understand DOT capabilities. 26