National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 525 Volume 6: Guide for Emergency Transportation Operations (2005)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "The Guide." NCHRP Report 525 Volume 6: Guide for Emergency Transportation Operations. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
6
bottomleft bottomright
Page
6
Front Matter (R1-R10)
The Call to Action (1-1)
The Challenges (2-2)
A Serious Commitment to ETO (3-3)
Self-Assessment Against Best Practice (4-4)
The Importance of Executive Leadership (5-5)
The Guide (6-7)
Driving Forces (8-13)
Technology (14-14)
Institutions (15-16)
Basic Improvement Strategies (17-19)
The Bottom Line: Degree and Type of Change Needed (20-21)
The Guidance Framework (22-22)
The Institutions and Leadership Self-Assessment (23-24)
The Institutions and Leadership Guidance (25-25)
Strategy 1: Develop Interagency Preparations for Complete Array of Incidents and Emergencies (26-26)
Strategy 2: Establish Formal Program with Senior Responsibility, Organization, and Reporting (27-27)
Strategy 3: Allocate Adequate Resources (28-28)
Strategy 4: Establish Objectives with Related Performance Measures and Accountability (29-29)
Strategy 5: Develop Agency Policy, Laws, and Regulations (30-30)
Improvement Strategies as Part of Agency Strategic Planning and Programming (31-31)
Moving Forward - the Importance of Executive Leadership (32-32)
The Operations and Technology Self-Assessment and Guidance (33-33)
Strategy 1: Make Hazard-Specific/Proactive Preparations (34-36)
Strategy 2: Develop and Implement Coordinated Protocols, Procedures, and Training (37-39)
Strategy 3: Deploy Advanced Technology/Equipment (40-42)
Strategy 4: Measure/Benchmark Performance Against Best Practice (43-45)
Moving Forward - Ideal State of the Practice for ETO (46-46)
Operations - State of the Practice (47-48)
Operations - Strengths and Weaknesses (49-50)
Technology - Strengths and Weaknesses (51-52)
Institutions - State of the Practice (53-53)
Institutions - Strengths and Weaknesses (54-56)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (57-57)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 6
GUIDE FOR EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS · Fostering of an interagency focus on the complete array of incidents and emergencies; · Establishment of a formal program with senior responsibility, organization, and reporting; · Allocation of adequate resources; · Establishment of objectives with related performance measures and account- ability; and · Development of agency policy, laws, regulations, and interagency agreements. Given a decision to move ahead, top-level agreement must be reached among the DOT, law enforcement, fire and rescue, towing and recovery, and state and local emergency response entities on a joint focus for improvement. Cementing this relationship is crucial, and DOTs can serve as conveners to create a positive environment for change. Policy commitment and joint agreements within the responder community can then be converted into a manageable program working simultaneously on joint interagency improvements and the department's own internal approach to achieving a higher level of sustainable activities and commitment to continuous, measurable improvement. This will require development of a strategic business plan, specifying responsibilities, resources, and per- formance targets. THE GUIDE Addressing the ETO challenge will require careful guidance and assignment of roles and responsibilities within and across agencies. The the first five sections of this guide are for all readers. The sections addressing Institutions and Leadership are for policy mak- ers and senior managers to establish the case for increased programmatic attention to ETO. The section addressing Operations and Technology is for program-level managers to develop specific plans and projects based on the evolving institutional framework established by senior managers. The resources guide, which is published as NCHRP Web Document 73, provides reference materials. Two related tools for process improvement are provided: 1. A self-assessment that allows managers to determine current strengths and weaknesses and thereby focus on the relevant part of the guidance material. 2. General strategies and tactics related to five areas of principal weakness described in a subsequent section of the guide. In the material that follows, Driving Forces and State of the Practice describe key chal- lenges to be overcome in three key areas--institutions, operations, and technology. The subsequent Improvement Strategies section serves as the basis for the guide and sets forth areas for change based on current problems. The Guidance Framework is then explained, followed by Self-Assessment and Guidance sections, which are organized around strategies and tactics for improvement. 6

OCR for page 7
GUIDE FOR EMERGENCY TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS It is important to recognize that this guidance material represents a starting point in identifying and consolidating related needs and practices to improve management of transportation-related emergencies. The material included necessarily represents a first cut at this consolidation--a point of departure--focused principally on the mix of inci- dents that impact the upper-level roadway systems (freeways and expressways). The same issues and approaches are substantially applicable on the lower-level components of the roadway network. Furthermore, the material developed in this guide can be used as the basis for further, more detailed guidance appropriate for specific jurisdictions and the mix of emergencies experienced in a given state, region, or jurisdiction (for example, more/less weather emergencies or planned events). 7