Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
37 1. Turner, O.D. and R. Reark, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 78: Value Engineering in Preconstruction and Construction, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, 23 pp. 2. Parker, D., Value Engineering Theory, Lecture Outline and Reading Supplement, 3rd ed., The Lawrence D. Miles Value Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1977, 201 pp. 3. Value Methodology Standard, SAVE International, Dayton, Ohio, Oct. 1998, 19 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.value-eng.org/pdf_docs/monographs/vmstd. pdf. 4. Miles, L., âOpening,â Notes from the First General Elec- tric Company VA Training Seminar, Oct. 1952, 164 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.wisc.edu/wendt/miles/ pdf/1329.pdf. 5. Borkenhagan, K., âValue Engineering: An Incredible Return on Investment,â Public Roads, Vol. 63, No. 2, TurnerâFairbank Highway Research Center, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., pp. 39â43 [Online]. Available: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/sept oct99/val-eng.htm. 6. Guidelines for Value Engineering, American Associa- tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1987. 7. OMB Circular A-131: Value Engineering, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C., May 21, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/circulars/a131/print/a131.html. 8. â23 CFR Parts 627, Value Engineering; Final Rule,â Federal Register, Vol. 62, No. 31, Feb. 14, 1997, pp. 6866â6869. 9. FHWA VE Policy, Federal-Aid Policy Guide, Transmittal 24, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Sep. 8, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://fhwa.dot.gov/ ve/veplcyg.htm. 10. â23 CFR Parts 627, et al., DesignâBuild Contracting; Final Rule,â Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 237, Dec. 10, 2002, pp. 75905â75906. 11. Annual Federal-Aid Value Engineering Summary Reports (FY1997 to FY2003), Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/vereport.htm. 12. Bethany, K., âMeasuring Performance of a VM Pro- gram,â Value World, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 12â17. 13. Trujillo, C., âValue Engineering Fine-Tuned, Case Study of New Mexicoâs Success,â TR News, No. 215, JulyâAug. 2001, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 26â27. 14. Robinson, J., âImproving the Effectiveness of Value Engineering Programs Within the State DOTs,â 1999 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Branson, Mo., July 1999, 14 pp. 15. Garrett, R. and S. Butts, âValue Engineering at the Vir- ginia Department of Transportation,â Value World, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 4â7. 16. Consultant Report (Form DT1538) Instructions, Wis- consin Department of Transportation, Madison [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/business/docs/ dt1538in.pdf. 17. AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee, Pro- posed Research Problem Statement for NCHRP Project 20-07, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2004, 3 pp. 18. Spartz, D., âGrowing VE in California DOT,â Value World, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 20â21. 19. âJob Plan,â Federal Highway Administration, Washing- ton, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ ve/vejob.htm. 20. âThe Value Engineering (VE) Process,â Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/veproc.htm. 21. âValue Engineering FAQ,â Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/vefaq.htm. 22. âWhy Perform Value Engineering Reviews?â Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/verev.htm. 23. Value Engineering Project Selection Process Control System Flow Chart, Value Engineering Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Oct. 2003, 1 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ projectmanagementoffice/VE%20Processes/projectselec- tion.pdf. 24. TP 1-9-5: Value Analysis Policy, Draft, Nevada Depart- ment of Transportation, Carson City, 2004, 9 pp. 25. Value Analysis Team Guide, 3rd ed., Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003, 177 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/ team-guide-3rd-rev-0803.pdf. 26. Value Analysis Report Guide, 3rd ed., Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003, 220 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/ report-guide-04-30-03.pdf. 27. Hunter, G., âLessons Learned from the California Depart- ment of Transportationâs Value Engineering Experience in the Transportation Sector,â 10th World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul, Turkey, July 4â8, 2004, 20 pp. 28. MTO Project Manager VE Guidelines, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, Mar. 2001, 117 pp. 29. Smith, K., âUsing Value Analysis to Scope Projects,â 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10â13, 2001, 38 slides. REFERENCES
38 30. â2003 Strategic Initiative Six: ODOT Will Improve the Quality of Its Construction Plans,â Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/strategicinitiatives/SI2003/ 0316.asp. 31. âProject Development Process (PDP) for Major Projects,â Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Nov. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/pdp/ PDPmanual/pdfs/A_Graphics_Complete_1104.pdf. 32. Clarke, J., Value Engineering for Small Transportation Projects, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass., Dec. 1999, 157 pp. [Online]. Available: http:// www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-0328100-143613/ unrestricted/clarketd.pdf. 33. Fodor, A., âThe Application of Value Analysis in the Design of Public Roads in Hungary,â 43rd Annual SAVE Conference, MinneapolisâSt. Paul, Minn., June 22â25, 2003, 9 pp. 34. Holmes, S. and E. Lane, âGrowing VE at the Ministry of Transportation Ontario,â 44th Annual SAVE Confer- ence, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12â15, 2004, 21 pp. 35. NCHRP Research Results Digest 274: Quality Assur- ance of Structural Materials, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2003, 21 pp. 36. Lane and Shoulder Widths VE Study, Draft Report, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, 2001. 37. Roadside Design VE Study, Draft Report, Ontario Min- istry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, 2002. 38. McClain, S., âIncorporating Value Engineering into Highway Planning,â 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 15â18, 2003, 7 pp. 39. Greenfield, H., âIntegrating VE in Project Planning,â 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12â15, 2004, 7 pp. 40. Wilson, D., âTaking the Weight Out of Truck Inspec- tionsâDeveloping New Commercial Vehicle Inspec- tion Facility Standards Using VE,â 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 15â18, 2003, 47 slides. 41. Holmes, S., âTeamwork Delivers New Design Concept, Commercial Vehicle Inspection Facilities,â Road Talk, Vol. 9, No. 3 [Online]. Available: http://www.mto.gov. on.ca/english/transtek/ve/teamwork.htm. 42. Johnson, R., J. Dovel, D. Younker, C. Hixon, and C. Miller, âThe Integration of Function Analysis and Virtual Reality Simulation,â 44th Annual SAVE Confer- ence, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12â15, 2004, 6 pp. 43. Value Analysis Activity Chart, Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transporta- tion, Sacramento [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca. gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/value-analysis-activity-chart.pdf. 44. Hunter, K. and J. Kelly, âIs One Day Enough? The Argument for Shorter VM/VE Studies,â 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12â15, 2004, 16 pp. 45. Meyers, G., âGetting Value Engineering Out of the Box,â 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10â13, 2001, 10 pp. 46. Ceran, T. and R.B. Newman, NCHRP Report 349: Main- tenance Considerations in Highway Design, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 1992, 87 pp. 47. Lieblong, K., âMixing Consultant Value Engineering Ser- vices with In-House ServicesâA Value Added Combi- nation,â 1999 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Branson, Mo., July 1999, 21 pp. 48. Jaffe, R., âWork Zones and Road User Costs,â 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10â13, 2001, 36 slides. 49. Bright, N., âEconomic AnalysesâHow to Choose What to Use During Evaluations,â 2003 AASHTO Value Engi- neering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 15â18, 2003, 16 pp. 50. Hunter, G., âAnalysis of Project Scope Performance Measurements Within the California Department of Transportation,â 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Con- ference, Tampa, Fla., July 15â18, 2003, 22 pp. 51. Stewart, R., âThe Integration of the Performance Mea- sures Process into Value Studies,â 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12â15, 2004, 20 pp. (includes appendix by G. Hunter âHistory of Proj- ect Performance Measurement in Highway Agenciesâ). 52. AASHTO VE Program Performance Measurements Sub- committee Findings, Revision 2.1, AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee, American Associa- tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2004, 9 pp. 53. Suhr, J., The Choosing By Advantages Decisionmaking System, Quorum Books, Westport, Conn., 1999, 293 pp. 54. Wilson, D., âRoad Safety Is No Accident,â Value World, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 14â16. 55. Robinson, J., B. Allen, E. Hauer, F. Navin, A. Scott, and G. Smith, Highway 407 Safety Review: A Safety Review of the First Phase of the Highway 407 Project Carried Out for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Asso- ciation of Professional Engineers of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada, 99 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www. peo.on.ca/publications/407report/chap7.htm. 56. Hamilton, D., âNo Easy Road,â Engineering Dimen- sions, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 36â38. 57. Interactive Highway Safety Design Model, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ihsdm. 58. Mak, K. and D. Sicking, NCHRP Report 492: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP)âEngineerâs Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 2003, 66 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_492.pdf. 59. Ho, G., S. Zein, and P. DeLeur, The Canadian Road Safety Audit Guide, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 81 pp.
39 64. Anderson, S. and J. Russell, NCHRP Report 451: Guide- lines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, 76 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/nchrp/ nchrp_r451-a.pdf (includes links to parts B and C). 65. âValue Engineering Performance Measures 2001â2003,â Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot. wa.gov/eesc/design/VE/pdf/vepolicy.pdf. 66. âReturn on Investment (ROI) for Value Engineering Projectsâ1999 to 2002,â New Mexico Department of Transportation, Value Engineering Unit, Santa Fe [Online]. Available: http://www.nmshtd.state.nm.us/ depts/ve/pdf/RIO-1999-2003.pdf. 60. McConachy, B., âIntegration of Value Analysis and Road Safety Audit Processes,â 42nd Annual SAVE Con- ference, Denver, Colo., May 5â8, 2002, pp. 189â197. 61. Neuman, T., M. Schwartz, L. Clark, and J. Bednar, NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 2002, 138 pp. 62. NCE Limited, âGreat Regional Streets StudyâValue Planning Session FAST Diagram,â Regional Municipal- ity of York, Newmarket, ON, Canada, Apr. 2004. 63. Get In, Get Out, Stay Out! Proceedings of the Work- shop on Pavement Renewal for Urban Freeways, Beckman Center, Irving, Calif., Feb. 16â19, 1998, 2000, 96 pp.