National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter Five - Conclusions
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Value Engineering Applications in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13869.
×
Page 36
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Value Engineering Applications in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13869.
×
Page 37
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Value Engineering Applications in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13869.
×
Page 38

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

37 1. Turner, O.D. and R. Reark, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 78: Value Engineering in Preconstruction and Construction, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, 23 pp. 2. Parker, D., Value Engineering Theory, Lecture Outline and Reading Supplement, 3rd ed., The Lawrence D. Miles Value Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1977, 201 pp. 3. Value Methodology Standard, SAVE International, Dayton, Ohio, Oct. 1998, 19 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.value-eng.org/pdf_docs/monographs/vmstd. pdf. 4. Miles, L., “Opening,” Notes from the First General Elec- tric Company VA Training Seminar, Oct. 1952, 164 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.wisc.edu/wendt/miles/ pdf/1329.pdf. 5. Borkenhagan, K., “Value Engineering: An Incredible Return on Investment,” Public Roads, Vol. 63, No. 2, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Va., pp. 39–43 [Online]. Available: http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/sept oct99/val-eng.htm. 6. Guidelines for Value Engineering, American Associa- tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1987. 7. OMB Circular A-131: Value Engineering, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C., May 21, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/circulars/a131/print/a131.html. 8. “23 CFR Parts 627, Value Engineering; Final Rule,” Federal Register, Vol. 62, No. 31, Feb. 14, 1997, pp. 6866–6869. 9. FHWA VE Policy, Federal-Aid Policy Guide, Transmittal 24, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Sep. 8, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://fhwa.dot.gov/ ve/veplcyg.htm. 10. “23 CFR Parts 627, et al., Design–Build Contracting; Final Rule,” Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 237, Dec. 10, 2002, pp. 75905–75906. 11. Annual Federal-Aid Value Engineering Summary Reports (FY1997 to FY2003), Federal Highway Admin- istration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/vereport.htm. 12. Bethany, K., “Measuring Performance of a VM Pro- gram,” Value World, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 12–17. 13. Trujillo, C., “Value Engineering Fine-Tuned, Case Study of New Mexico’s Success,” TR News, No. 215, July–Aug. 2001, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 26–27. 14. Robinson, J., “Improving the Effectiveness of Value Engineering Programs Within the State DOTs,” 1999 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Branson, Mo., July 1999, 14 pp. 15. Garrett, R. and S. Butts, “Value Engineering at the Vir- ginia Department of Transportation,” Value World, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 4–7. 16. Consultant Report (Form DT1538) Instructions, Wis- consin Department of Transportation, Madison [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/business/docs/ dt1538in.pdf. 17. AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee, Pro- posed Research Problem Statement for NCHRP Project 20-07, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2004, 3 pp. 18. Spartz, D., “Growing VE in California DOT,” Value World, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 20–21. 19. “Job Plan,” Federal Highway Administration, Washing- ton, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ ve/vejob.htm. 20. “The Value Engineering (VE) Process,” Federal High- way Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/veproc.htm. 21. “Value Engineering FAQ,” Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/vefaq.htm. 22. “Why Perform Value Engineering Reviews?” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/verev.htm. 23. Value Engineering Project Selection Process Control System Flow Chart, Value Engineering Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Oct. 2003, 1 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ projectmanagementoffice/VE%20Processes/projectselec- tion.pdf. 24. TP 1-9-5: Value Analysis Policy, Draft, Nevada Depart- ment of Transportation, Carson City, 2004, 9 pp. 25. Value Analysis Team Guide, 3rd ed., Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003, 177 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/ team-guide-3rd-rev-0803.pdf. 26. Value Analysis Report Guide, 3rd ed., Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003, 220 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/ report-guide-04-30-03.pdf. 27. Hunter, G., “Lessons Learned from the California Depart- ment of Transportation’s Value Engineering Experience in the Transportation Sector,” 10th World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul, Turkey, July 4–8, 2004, 20 pp. 28. MTO Project Manager VE Guidelines, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, Mar. 2001, 117 pp. 29. Smith, K., “Using Value Analysis to Scope Projects,” 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10–13, 2001, 38 slides. REFERENCES

38 30. “2003 Strategic Initiative Six: ODOT Will Improve the Quality of Its Construction Plans,” Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/strategicinitiatives/SI2003/ 0316.asp. 31. “Project Development Process (PDP) for Major Projects,” Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Nov. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/pdp/ PDPmanual/pdfs/A_Graphics_Complete_1104.pdf. 32. Clarke, J., Value Engineering for Small Transportation Projects, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass., Dec. 1999, 157 pp. [Online]. Available: http:// www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-0328100-143613/ unrestricted/clarketd.pdf. 33. Fodor, A., “The Application of Value Analysis in the Design of Public Roads in Hungary,” 43rd Annual SAVE Conference, Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minn., June 22–25, 2003, 9 pp. 34. Holmes, S. and E. Lane, “Growing VE at the Ministry of Transportation Ontario,” 44th Annual SAVE Confer- ence, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12–15, 2004, 21 pp. 35. NCHRP Research Results Digest 274: Quality Assur- ance of Structural Materials, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2003, 21 pp. 36. Lane and Shoulder Widths VE Study, Draft Report, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, 2001. 37. Roadside Design VE Study, Draft Report, Ontario Min- istry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, 2002. 38. McClain, S., “Incorporating Value Engineering into Highway Planning,” 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 15–18, 2003, 7 pp. 39. Greenfield, H., “Integrating VE in Project Planning,” 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12–15, 2004, 7 pp. 40. Wilson, D., ‘Taking the Weight Out of Truck Inspec- tions—Developing New Commercial Vehicle Inspec- tion Facility Standards Using VE,” 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 15–18, 2003, 47 slides. 41. Holmes, S., “Teamwork Delivers New Design Concept, Commercial Vehicle Inspection Facilities,” Road Talk, Vol. 9, No. 3 [Online]. Available: http://www.mto.gov. on.ca/english/transtek/ve/teamwork.htm. 42. Johnson, R., J. Dovel, D. Younker, C. Hixon, and C. Miller, “The Integration of Function Analysis and Virtual Reality Simulation,” 44th Annual SAVE Confer- ence, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12–15, 2004, 6 pp. 43. Value Analysis Activity Chart, Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transporta- tion, Sacramento [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca. gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/value-analysis-activity-chart.pdf. 44. Hunter, K. and J. Kelly, “Is One Day Enough? The Argument for Shorter VM/VE Studies,” 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12–15, 2004, 16 pp. 45. Meyers, G., “Getting Value Engineering Out of the Box,” 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10–13, 2001, 10 pp. 46. Ceran, T. and R.B. Newman, NCHRP Report 349: Main- tenance Considerations in Highway Design, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 1992, 87 pp. 47. Lieblong, K., “Mixing Consultant Value Engineering Ser- vices with In-House Services—A Value Added Combi- nation,” 1999 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Branson, Mo., July 1999, 21 pp. 48. Jaffe, R., “Work Zones and Road User Costs,” 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10–13, 2001, 36 slides. 49. Bright, N., “Economic Analyses—How to Choose What to Use During Evaluations,” 2003 AASHTO Value Engi- neering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 15–18, 2003, 16 pp. 50. Hunter, G., “Analysis of Project Scope Performance Measurements Within the California Department of Transportation,” 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Con- ference, Tampa, Fla., July 15–18, 2003, 22 pp. 51. Stewart, R., “The Integration of the Performance Mea- sures Process into Value Studies,” 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 12–15, 2004, 20 pp. (includes appendix by G. Hunter “History of Proj- ect Performance Measurement in Highway Agencies”). 52. AASHTO VE Program Performance Measurements Sub- committee Findings, Revision 2.1, AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee, American Associa- tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., Apr. 2004, 9 pp. 53. Suhr, J., The Choosing By Advantages Decisionmaking System, Quorum Books, Westport, Conn., 1999, 293 pp. 54. Wilson, D., “Road Safety Is No Accident,” Value World, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 14–16. 55. Robinson, J., B. Allen, E. Hauer, F. Navin, A. Scott, and G. Smith, Highway 407 Safety Review: A Safety Review of the First Phase of the Highway 407 Project Carried Out for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Asso- ciation of Professional Engineers of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada, 99 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www. peo.on.ca/publications/407report/chap7.htm. 56. Hamilton, D., “No Easy Road,” Engineering Dimen- sions, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 36–38. 57. Interactive Highway Safety Design Model, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ihsdm. 58. Mak, K. and D. Sicking, NCHRP Report 492: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP)—Engineer’s Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, D.C., 2003, 66 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_492.pdf. 59. Ho, G., S. Zein, and P. DeLeur, The Canadian Road Safety Audit Guide, Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 81 pp.

39 64. Anderson, S. and J. Russell, NCHRP Report 451: Guide- lines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value Contracting, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, 76 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/nchrp/ nchrp_r451-a.pdf (includes links to parts B and C). 65. “Value Engineering Performance Measures 2001–2003,” Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot. wa.gov/eesc/design/VE/pdf/vepolicy.pdf. 66. “Return on Investment (ROI) for Value Engineering Projects—1999 to 2002,” New Mexico Department of Transportation, Value Engineering Unit, Santa Fe [Online]. Available: http://www.nmshtd.state.nm.us/ depts/ve/pdf/RIO-1999-2003.pdf. 60. McConachy, B., “Integration of Value Analysis and Road Safety Audit Processes,” 42nd Annual SAVE Con- ference, Denver, Colo., May 5–8, 2002, pp. 189–197. 61. Neuman, T., M. Schwartz, L. Clark, and J. Bednar, NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 2002, 138 pp. 62. NCE Limited, “Great Regional Streets Study—Value Planning Session FAST Diagram,” Regional Municipal- ity of York, Newmarket, ON, Canada, Apr. 2004. 63. Get In, Get Out, Stay Out! Proceedings of the Work- shop on Pavement Renewal for Urban Freeways, Beckman Center, Irving, Calif., Feb. 16–19, 1998, 2000, 96 pp.

Next: Bibliography »
Value Engineering Applications in Transportation Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 352: Value Engineering Applications in Transportation examines the current value engineering (VE) practices of highway transportation agencies in the United States and Canada. Value engineering (VE) is the systematic review of a project, product, or process to improve performance, quality, and/or life-cycle cost by an independent multidisciplinary team of specialists. The report identifies the reported best practices, key strengths, and challenges of current VE study processes and agency programs, and offers guidance on applying and improving the effectiveness of VE in projects and programs.

NCHRP Synthesis 352 was published on December 8, 2005. An incorrect version of Figure 14 was included on page 33. This has been corrected in the on-line version of the report.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!