Click for next page ( 37

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 36
37 REFERENCES 1. Turner, O.D. and R. Reark, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway 15. Garrett, R. and S. Butts, "Value Engineering at the Vir- Practice 78: Value Engineering in Preconstruction and ginia Department of Transportation," Value World, Vol. Construction, Transportation Research Board, National 22, No. 2, pp. 47. Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, 23 pp. 16. Consultant Report (Form DT1538) Instructions, Wis- 2. Parker, D., Value Engineering Theory, Lecture Outline consin Department of Transportation, Madison [Online]. and Reading Supplement, 3rd ed., The Lawrence D. Miles Available: Value Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1977, 201 pp. dt1538in.pdf. 3. Value Methodology Standard, SAVE International, 17. AASHTO Value Engineering Technical Committee, Pro- Dayton, Ohio, Oct. 1998, 19 pp. [Online]. Available: posed Research Problem Statement for NCHRP Project 20-07, American Association of State Highway and Trans- pdf. portation Officials, Washington, D.C., May 2004, 3 pp. 4. Miles, L., "Opening," Notes from the First General Elec- 18. Spartz, D., "Growing VE in California DOT," Value World, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 2021. tric Company VA Training Seminar, Oct. 1952, 164 pp. 19. "Job Plan," Federal Highway Administration, Washing- [Online]. Available: ton, D.C. [Online]. Available: pdf/1329.pdf. ve/vejob.htm. 5. Borkenhagan, K., "Value Engineering: An Incredible 20. "The Value Engineering (VE) Process," Federal High- Return on Investment," Public Roads, Vol. 63, No. 2, way Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Avail- TurnerFairbank Highway Research Center, Federal able: Highway Administration, McLean, Va., pp. 3943 21. "Value Engineering FAQ," Federal Highway Adminis- [Online]. Available: tration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// oct99/val-eng.htm. 6. Guidelines for Value Engineering, American Associa- 22. "Why Perform Value Engineering Reviews?" Federal tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Washington, D.C., 1987. Available: 7. OMB Circular A-131: Value Engineering, Office of 23. Value Engineering Project Selection Process Control Management and Budget, Washington, D.C., May 21, System Flow Chart, Value Engineering Office, Florida 1993 [Online]. Available: Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Oct. 2003, omb/circulars/a131/print/a131.html. 1 pp. [Online]. Available: 8. "23 CFR Parts 627, Value Engineering; Final Rule," projectmanagementoffice/VE%20Processes/projectselec- Federal Register, Vol. 62, No. 31, Feb. 14, 1997, pp. tion.pdf. 68666869. 24. TP 1-9-5: Value Analysis Policy, Draft, Nevada Depart- 9. FHWA VE Policy, Federal-Aid Policy Guide, Transmittal ment of Transportation, Carson City, 2004, 9 pp. 24, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 25. Value Analysis Team Guide, 3rd ed., Division of Design, Sep. 8, 1998 [Online]. Available: Office of Special Projects, California Department of ve/veplcyg.htm. Transportation, Sacramento, 2003, 177 pp. [Online]. 10. "23 CFR Parts 627, et al., DesignBuild Contracting; Available: Final Rule," Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 237, Dec. team-guide-3rd-rev-0803.pdf. 10, 2002, pp. 7590575906. 26. Value Analysis Report Guide, 3rd ed., Division of Design, 11. Annual Federal-Aid Value Engineering Summary Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, 2003, 220 pp. [Online]. Reports (FY1997 to FY2003), Federal Highway Admin- Available: istration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available: http:// report-guide-04-30-03.pdf. 27. Hunter, G., "Lessons Learned from the California Depart- 12. Bethany, K., "Measuring Performance of a VM Pro- ment of Transportation's Value Engineering Experience gram," Value World, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 1217. in the Transportation Sector," 10th World Conference on 13. Trujillo, C., "Value Engineering Fine-Tuned, Case Study Transport Research, Istanbul, Turkey, July 48, 2004, of New Mexico's Success," TR News, No. 215, JulyAug. 20 pp. 2001, Transportation Research Board, National Research 28. MTO Project Manager VE Guidelines, Ontario Ministry Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 2627. of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, Mar. 14. Robinson, J., "Improving the Effectiveness of Value 2001, 117 pp. Engineering Programs Within the State DOTs," 1999 29. Smith, K., "Using Value Analysis to Scope Projects," AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Branson, Mo., 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San July 1999, 14 pp. Diego, Calif., July 1013, 2001, 38 slides.

OCR for page 36
38 30. "2003 Strategic Initiative Six: ODOT Will Improve the 45. Meyers, G., "Getting Value Engineering Out of the Box," Quality of Its Construction Plans," Ohio Department of 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Transportation, Columbus, 2004 [Online]. Available: Diego, Calif., July 1013, 2001, 10 pp. 46. Ceran, T. and R.B. Newman, NCHRP Report 349: Main- 0316.asp. tenance Considerations in Highway Design, Transporta- 31. "Project Development Process (PDP) for Major Projects," tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Nov. 2004 ington, D.C., 1992, 87 pp. [Online]. Available: 47. Lieblong, K., "Mixing Consultant Value Engineering Ser- PDPmanual/pdfs/A_Graphics_Complete_1104.pdf. vices with In-House Services--A Value Added Combi- 32. Clarke, J., Value Engineering for Small Transportation nation," 1999 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, Projects, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Branson, Mo., July 1999, 21 pp. Mass., Dec. 1999, 157 pp. [Online]. Available: http:// 48. Jaffe, R., "Work Zones and Road User Costs," 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, unrestricted/clarketd.pdf. Calif., July 1013, 2001, 36 slides. 33. Fodor, A., "The Application of Value Analysis in the 49. Bright, N., "Economic Analyses--How to Choose What Design of Public Roads in Hungary," 43rd Annual SAVE to Use During Evaluations," 2003 AASHTO Value Engi- Conference, MinneapolisSt. Paul, Minn., June 2225, neering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 1518, 2003, 2003, 9 pp. 16 pp. 34. Holmes, S. and E. Lane, "Growing VE at the Ministry of 50. Hunter, G., "Analysis of Project Scope Performance Transportation Ontario," 44th Annual SAVE Confer- Measurements Within the California Department of ence, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 1215, 2004, 21 pp. Transportation," 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Con- 35. NCHRP Research Results Digest 274: Quality Assur- ference, Tampa, Fla., July 1518, 2003, 22 pp. ance of Structural Materials, Transportation Research 51. Stewart, R., "The Integration of the Performance Mea- Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., sures Process into Value Studies," 44th Annual SAVE Aug. 2003, 21 pp. Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 1215, 2004, 36. Lane and Shoulder Widths VE Study, Draft Report, 20 pp. (includes appendix by G. Hunter "History of Proj- Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, ect Performance Measurement in Highway Agencies"). Canada, 2001. 52. AASHTO VE Program Performance Measurements Sub- 37. Roadside Design VE Study, Draft Report, Ontario Min- committee Findings, Revision 2.1, AASHTO Value istry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, 2002. Engineering Technical Committee, American Associa- 38. McClain, S., "Incorporating Value Engineering into tion of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Highway Planning," 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Washington, D.C., Apr. 2004, 9 pp. Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 1518, 2003, 7 pp. 39. Greenfield, H., "Integrating VE in Project Planning," 53. Suhr, J., The Choosing By Advantages Decisionmaking 44th Annual SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, System, Quorum Books, Westport, Conn., 1999, 293 pp. July 1215, 2004, 7 pp. 54. Wilson, D., "Road Safety Is No Accident," Value World, 40. Wilson, D., `Taking the Weight Out of Truck Inspec- Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1416. tions--Developing New Commercial Vehicle Inspec- 55. Robinson, J., B. Allen, E. Hauer, F. Navin, A. Scott, and tion Facility Standards Using VE," 2003 AASHTO Value G. Smith, Highway 407 Safety Review: A Safety Review Engineering Conference, Tampa, Fla., July 1518, 2003, of the First Phase of the Highway 407 Project Carried 47 slides. Out for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, Asso- 41. Holmes, S., "Teamwork Delivers New Design Concept, ciation of Professional Engineers of Ontario, Toronto, Commercial Vehicle Inspection Facilities," Road Talk, ON, Canada, 99 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www. Vol. 9, No. 3 [Online]. Available: 56. Hamilton, D., "No Easy Road," Engineering Dimen- 42. Johnson, R., J. Dovel, D. Younker, C. Hixon, and sions, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 3638. C. Miller, "The Integration of Function Analysis and 57. Interactive Highway Safety Design Model, Federal Virtual Reality Simulation," 44th Annual SAVE Confer- Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. [Online]. ence, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 1215, 2004, 6 pp. Available: 43. Value Analysis Activity Chart, Division of Design, Office 58. Mak, K. and D. Sicking, NCHRP Report 492: Roadside of Special Projects, California Department of Transporta- Safety Analysis Program (RSAP)--Engineer's Manual, tion, Sacramento [Online]. Available: Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- gov/hq/oppd/value/pdf/value-analysis-activity-chart.pdf. cil, Washington, D.C., 2003, 66 pp. [Online]. Available: 44. Hunter, K. and J. Kelly, "Is One Day Enough? The Argument for Shorter VM/VE Studies," 44th Annual 59. Ho, G., S. Zein, and P. DeLeur, The Canadian Road SAVE Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, July 1215, Safety Audit Guide, Transportation Association of 2004, 16 pp. Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 81 pp.

OCR for page 36
39 60. McConachy, B., "Integration of Value Analysis and 64. Anderson, S. and J. Russell, NCHRP Report 451: Guide- Road Safety Audit Processes," 42nd Annual SAVE Con- lines for Warranty, Multi-Parameter, and Best Value ference, Denver, Colo., May 58, 2002, pp. 189197. Contracting, Transportation Research Board, National 61. Neuman, T., M. Schwartz, L. Clark, and J. Bednar, Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, 76 pp. NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for [Online]. Available: Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions, Transportation nchrp_r451-a.pdf (includes links to parts B and C). Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- 65. "Value Engineering Performance Measures 20012003," ton, D.C., 2002, 138 pp. Washington State Department of Transportation, 62. NCE Limited, "Great Regional Streets Study--Value Olympia, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot. Planning Session FAST Diagram," Regional Municipal- ity of York, Newmarket, ON, Canada, Apr. 2004. 66. "Return on Investment (ROI) for Value Engineering 63. Get In, Get Out, Stay Out! Proceedings of the Work- Projects--1999 to 2002," New Mexico Department of shop on Pavement Renewal for Urban Freeways, Transportation, Value Engineering Unit, Santa Fe Beckman Center, Irving, Calif., Feb. 1619, 1998, [Online]. Available: 2000, 96 pp. depts/ve/pdf/RIO-1999-2003.pdf.