National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: References
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Value Engineering Applications in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13869.
×
Page 39
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Value Engineering Applications in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13869.
×
Page 40
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. Value Engineering Applications in Transportation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13869.
×
Page 41

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

40 2001 Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridges, US Customary English Units, 104.11—Value Engineering, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton [Online]. Available: http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/ eng/specs/Road&Bridges/English/EnglishStandardSpeci- fications.htm#s10411. 2003 Value Engineering Directory, AASHTO VE Task Force, American Association of State Highway and Trans- portation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2003, 12 pp. 23 CFR Part 627—Value Engineering Regulation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Feb. 14, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ve/ vereg.htm. 41USC432 Chapter 7: Value Engineering [Online]. Avail- able: http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate. cgi?WAISdocID=769796116367+11+0+0&WAISaction= retrieve. A5a—VE Project Scope Summary, South Dakota Depart- ment of Transportation, Pierre, Apr. 2004, 21 pp. Borkenhagan, K., “Value Engineering in the Highway Indus- try,” Value World, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 2–3. Cochrane, R. and A. Lyng, “Value Engineering in the Penn- sylvania Department of Transportation,” Transportation Research Record 940, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 67–69. Collins, A., “Bridge Design Combines Functionality with Historical Integrity,” Public Works, May 2001, pp. 36–39. Construction Manual, Chapter 3, Section 3-514 Cost Reduc- tion Incentive, Division of Design, Office of Special Proj- ects, California Department of Transportation, Sacra- mento, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/ hq/construc/manual2001/chapter3/chp3_5.pdf. Design Manual, Section 315—Value Engineering, Draft, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, May 1998, 7 pp. Design Procedures Manual, Appendix N—Value Engineer- ing in Design, New York State Department of Transporta- tion, Albany, Oct. 2003, 10 pp. Fernandez, N., T. Luglio, A. Golf, F. Waesche, III, F. Turpin, and S. Gonzales, Proceedings of the Workshop on Interna- tional Transit Turnkey and Joint Development—Session 4: Value Engineering, Design and Construction, Oct. 15–19, 1996, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 1998, pp. 39–43. Ferragut, T., Transportation Research Circular E-059: Accelerated Highway Construction Workshop Series Sum- mary, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 26–27 [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/circulars/ec059.pdf. Garrett, R., “Value Engineering Terminology and Method- ology,” 2001 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, San Diego, Calif., July 10–13, 2001, 12 pp. Hancher, D., “Contracting Methods for Highway Construc- tion,” TR News, No. 205, Nov./Dec. 1999, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 10–14 [Online]. Available: http://gulliver.trb. org/publications/millennium/00023.pdf. Holmes, S., “Project Performance Measurement: What Is Project Value?” Road Talk, Vol. 9, No. 2, Ontario Min- istry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada [Online]. Available: http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/ transtek/ve/boundaries.htm. Hong, H., “Structure Process: A New VE Approach to the Preliminary Design Stage of Highway Bridges,” 43rd Annual SAVE Conference, Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minn. June 22–25, 2003, 12 pp. Hunter, G., “Value Engineering Program Performance Mea- surements,” 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Confer- ence, Tampa, Fla., July 15–19, 2003, 33 pp. “It’s the Law—Government Policy and Regulations,” Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, Colo. [Online]. Available: http://www.usbr.gov/ pmts/valuprog/law.html. Johnson, P., “Value Engineering of Conceptual System Alternatives Establishes Capital Improvement Programs for Highway Projects,” 42nd Annual SAVE Conference, Denver, Colo., May 5–8, 2002, pp. 70–84. Kaufman, J., Value Engineering for the Practitioner, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1985, 222 pp. Lewis, J., “Strategic Management,” TRB Millennium Papers, A1A07 Committee on Strategic Management, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 21 pp. [Online]. Available: http://gulliver. trb.org/publications/millennium/00110.pdf. Mason, J. and K. Mahoney, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 316: Design Exception Practices, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, 22 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/pub- lications/nchrp/nchrp_syn316.pdf. McClintock, S., “Value Is in the Eye of the Beholder, Part 2: Fifteen Real World Projects with Reduced Risk and Schedule,” 42nd Annual SAVE Conference, Denver, Colo., May 15–18, 2002, pp. 183–188. Miller, J., M. Garvin, C. Ibbs, and S. Mahoney, “Toward a New Paradigm: Simultaneous Use of Multiple Project Delivery Methods,” Journal of Management in Engineer- ing, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 58–67. MTO VE Guidelines, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, St. Catharines, ON, Canada, Jan. 2004, 18 pp. “Our 26.7:1 Return on Investment,” Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, Colo. [Online]. Available: http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/valuprog/save.html. Pietroforte, R. and T. El-Korchi, NCHRP Report 442: Systems Approach to Evaluating Innovations for Integration into Highway Practice, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, 103 pp. BIBLIOGRAPHY

41 “Policy 27-008(P), Value Engineering in Construction,” Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, April 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/ construction/OCA/policy/27-008(P).pdf. “Policy 27-010(P), Change Orders,” Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, June 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/construction/OCA/policy/27- 010(P).pdf. “Policy 27-013(P), Innovative Contracting,” Ohio Depart- ment of Transportation, Columbus, May 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.oh.us/construction/OCA/ policy/innovativecontractingpolicy_27-013.pdf. “Policy 510-008(P), Standard Procedure for Value Engineer- ing in Construction,” Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, April 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot. state.oh.us/construction/OCA/policy/510-008(SP).pdf. “Procedure 625-030-002-e, Value Engineering Program,” Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Oct. 2003, 13 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www2.dot.state.fl. us/proceduraldocuments/procedures/bin/625030002.pdf. “Procedure 625-030-005-c, Value Engineering Program,” Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Oct. 2003, 5 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www2.dot.state.fl. us/proceduraldocuments/procedures/bin/625030005.pdf. Project Development Procedures Manual, Chapter 19— Value Analysis, Draft, Division of Design, Office of Spe- cial Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Sep. 2002, 32 pp. Publication 408: Construction Specifications, Section 104— Scope of Work, Change No. 2, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, Oct. 2004 [Online]. Avail- able: ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/bureaus/design/pub408/ Change%20No2/Sections/104.pdf. “Quality Assurance Review Plan for Value Engineering in Construction,” Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Apr. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www. dot.state.oh.us/construction/OCA/QAR/2004%20QAR% 20VECP.htm. “Reclamation Value Program’s Frequently Asked Ques- tions—FAQs,” Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior, Denver, Colo. [Online]. Available: http:// www.usbr.gov/pmts/valuprog/faq.html. Richards, S. and C. Dudek, “Selection of Work Zone Chan- nelizing Devices Using the Value Engineering Approach,” Transportation Research Record 1035, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 78–82. Ruck, B. and D. Stewart, “Value Optimization: VA/VE and Roadway Safety,” 42nd Annual SAVE Conference, Den- ver, Colo., May 5–8, 2002, pp. 287–296. Standard Specifications: 962—Value Engineering, New Brunswick Department of Transportation, Fredericton, NB, Canada, Jan. 2003, 2 pp. “The Value Method,” Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Depart- ment of the Interior, Denver, Colo. [Online]. Available: http://www.usbr.gov/pmts/valuprog/method.html. Trans Tech Management, Inc., Oldham Historic Properties, Inc., and Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., NCHRP Web Document 69: Performance Measures for Context Sensitive Solutions—A Guidebook for State DOTs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, 90 pp. [Online]. Avail- able: http://trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_w69.pdf. TRB Special Report 249: Building Momentum for Change, Creating a Strategic Forum for Innovation in Highway Infrastructure, Committee for the Study of Approaches for Increasing Private-Sector Involvement in the Highway Inno- vation Process, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, 47 pp. TRB Special Report 260: Strategic Highway Research—Sav- ing Lives, Reducing Congestion, Improving Quality of Life, Committee for a Study for a Future Strategic High- way Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, 204 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/sr/ sr260.pdf. “Value Analysis—Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ),” Division of Design, Office of Special Projects, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/value/faq.htm. Value Engineering Annual Report FY 2003–2004, Value Engineering Office, Florida Department of Transporta- tion, Tallahassee, Aug. 2004, 19 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/projectmanagementoffice/PDF %20Files/Annual%20Report%2003_04.pdf. Value Engineering Final Rule, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, Memorandum, Oct. 20, 1997. Value Engineering Manual of Instruction, Utah Department of Transportation, Engineering Services, Salt Lake City, 134 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.udot.utah.gov/ esd/Manuals/ValueEngineering/VE-Manual.htm. “Value Engineering Performance Measures 2001–2003,” Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.wsdot. wa.gov/eesc/design/VE/pdf/vepolicy.pdf. Value Engineering Procedure 08A4-1, Utah Department of Transportation, Engineering Services, Salt Lake City, 11 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.udot.utah.gov/esd/ Policies/08a4-1.pdf. Value Engineering Procedures for Federal-Aid Projects on the NHS with Total Project/Corridor Cost Greater than $25 Million, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, May 2002, 10 pp. Value Engineering Procedures Handbook, Value Engineering Unit, New Mexico Department of Transportation, Santa Fe, March 2004, 33 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www. nmshtd.state.nm.us/depts/ve/pdf/VE-PROCEDURES- MANUAL.pdf. “Value Engineering Program,” Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City [Online]. Available: http://www.modot.state.mo.us/services/engineering/ valueengineering.htm. Warne, T., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 313: State DOT Outsourcing and Private-Sector Utilization, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun-

cil, Washington, D.C., 2003, 42 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_syn316.pdf. Wilson, D., “Enhanced Public Consultation Through Value Planning,” Transportation Association of Canada 2000 Annual Conference, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2000, 13 pp. Wilson, D., “Putting the Value Back into Planning,” 40th Annual SAVE Conference, Reno, Nev., June 25–28, 2000, 9 pp. Wilson, D., “Make Better Decisions in Your Community— Improving the Value of Municipal Planning,” Context- Sensitive Design Workshop Presentation, Regional Munici- pality of York, Newmarket, ON, Canada, 2002, 47 slides. Wilson, D., “Taking the Weight Out of Truck Inspections— Developing New Commercial Vehicle Inspection Facility 42 Standards Using VE,” 2003 AASHTO Value Engineering Conference, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2003, 47 slides. Wilson, E. and M. Lipinski, NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 336: Road Safety Audits, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004, 127 pp. [Online]. Available: http://trb.org/ publications/nchrp/nchrp_syn336.pdf. Wixson, J., “How Root Cause Analysis Can Improve the Value Methodology,” 42nd Annual SAVE Conference, Denver, Colo., May 5–8, 2002, pp. 361–367. “WSDOT VE Policy,” Washington State Department of Trans- portation, Olympia, 7 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www. wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/design/VE/pdf/vepolicy.pdf.

Next: Glossary »
Value Engineering Applications in Transportation Get This Book
×
 Value Engineering Applications in Transportation
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 352: Value Engineering Applications in Transportation examines the current value engineering (VE) practices of highway transportation agencies in the United States and Canada. Value engineering (VE) is the systematic review of a project, product, or process to improve performance, quality, and/or life-cycle cost by an independent multidisciplinary team of specialists. The report identifies the reported best practices, key strengths, and challenges of current VE study processes and agency programs, and offers guidance on applying and improving the effectiveness of VE in projects and programs.

NCHRP Synthesis 352 was published on December 8, 2005. An incorrect version of Figure 14 was included on page 33. This has been corrected in the on-line version of the report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!