Aesthetic Concrete Barrier Design (2006)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

71 REFERENCES 1. Leonhardt, F., “Developing Guidelines for Aesthetic Design.” Bridge Aesthetics Around the World, Washington, DC, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council (1991). 2. Tang, H. C., “Philosophical Basis for Chinese Bridge Aesthet- ics.” Bridge Aesthetics Around the World, Washington, DC, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council (1991). 3. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, “Context Sensitive Design and Thinking Beyond the Pavement.” Washington, DC (2002). 4. Grob, J., “Design Principles and Guidelines for Transportation Project; Getting Projects Built.” American Society of Highway Engineers, SCANNER Newsletter (December 2001). 5. Brewer, J., German, J., Krammes, R., Movassaghi, K., Okamoto, J., Otto, S., Ruff, W., Sillan, S., Stamatiadis, N., and Walters, R., “Geometric Design Practices for European Roads.” Contract No. DTFH61-99-C-0005, Report No. FHWA-PL-01- 026, American Trade Initiatives, Alexandria, VA (2001). 6. Kaplan, R., “Environmental Description and Prediction: A Conceptual Analysis.” Environment, Cognition, and Action: An Integrated Approach, New York, NY, Oxford University Press (1991). 7. Garling, T., Lindberg, E., Torell, G., and Evans, G. W., “From Environmental to Ecological Cognition.” Environment, Cogni- tion, and Action: An Integrated Approach, New York, NY, Oxford University Press (1991). 8. “Roadscape: The Analysis of Visual-Perceptual Mechanism.” International Association of Traffic & Safety Science (1983). 9. Hornbeck, P. L., and Okerlund, G. A., “Visual Quality for the Highway User: A Study of the Relation of Factors of Visual Quality to Route Design.” Highway Research Record 410, Highway Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, DC (1972). 10. Noble, M., and Sanders, A. F., “Searching for Traffic Signals While Engaged in Compensatory Tracking.” Human Factors, Vol. 1, No. 22 (1980). 11. Mace, D. J., and Pollack, L., “Visual Complexity and Sign Brightness in Detection and Recognition of Traffic Signs.” Transportation Research Record 904, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (1983). 12. Allen, R. W., and O’Hanlon, J. F., “Effects of Roadway Delin- eation and Visibility Conditions on Driver Steering Perfor- mance.” Transportation Research Record 739, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (1979). 13. Jenkins, S. E., and Cole, B. L., “Daytime Conspicuity of Road Traffic Control Devices.” Transportation Research Circular 297, Transportation Research Board, National Research Coun- cil, Washington, DC (1985). 14. Gallagher, V. P., and Lerner, N. D. “Measuring the Visual Com- plexity of Nighttime Roadways.” Transportation Research Cir- cular 297, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC (1985). 15. Adrian, W. K., “Visual Performance Under Night Driving Conditions.” Transportation Research Circular 297, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, DC (1985). 16. Scallen, S., and Carmody, J., “Investigating the Effects of Road- way Design on Driver Behavior: Applications for Minnesota Highway Design.” Minnesota Department of Transportation, Mn/DOT Report 1999-10, 1999. http://www.research.dot.state. mn.us/detail.cfm?productID=500#. 17. Sekuler, R., and Blake, R., Perception. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1994). 18. AASHTO Roadside Design Guide. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC (2002). 19. White, M., Jewell, J., and Peter, R., “Crash Testing of Various Textured Barriers.” Contract No. F2001TL17, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA (2002). 20. Jewell, J., Rowhani, P., Stoughton, R., and Crozier, W., “Vehicular Crash Tests of a Slip-Formed, Single Slope, Con- crete Median Barrier with Integral Concrete Glare Screen.” California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA (1997). 21. Mak, K. K., and Menges, W. L., “Testing of State Roadside Safety Systems, Volume VIII: Appendix G–Crash Test and Evaluation of the Single Sloped Bride Rail.” Texas Trans- portation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (1996). 22. Buth, C. E., Hirsch, T. J., and Menges, W. L., “Testing of New Bridge Rail and Transition Designs, Volume VI: Appendix E–32-in (813-mm) New Jersey Safety Shape.” Texas Trans- portation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (1997). 23. Buth, C. E., Menges, W. L., and Butler, B. G., “Testing and Evaluation of NCHRP 350 Test Level Four Concrete Bridge Railing for Crooked River Gorge 18211.” Texas Transporta- tion Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (1997). 24. Bullard, D. L., Buth, C. E., Williams, W. F., Menges, W. L., and Schoeneman, S. K. “NCHRP Report 350 Evaluation of the T501 Bridge Rail with Soundwall.” Texas Transporta- tion Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (2001). 25. Federal Highway Administration, “Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects: FP-96.” Washington, DC (1996).