National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

NCHRP Report 500 Volume 17: A Guide for Reducing Work Zone Collisions (2006)
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)

Citation Manager

Transportation Research Board. "Implementation Step 4: Develop Program Policies, Guidelines, and Specifications." NCHRP Report 500 Volume 17: A Guide for Reducing Work Zone Collisions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
146
bottomleft bottomright
Page
146
Front Matter (R1-R10)
General Description of the Problem (1-2)
Objectives of the Emphasis Area (3-5)
Section II - Introduction (6-6)
General Description of the Problem (7-8)
Specific Attributes of the Problem (9-10)
Key References (11-12)
Section IV - Index of Strategies by Implementation Timeframe and Relative Cost (13-14)
Objectives (15-16)
Types of Strategies (17-17)
Related Strategies for Creating a Truly Comprehensive Approach (18-19)
Objective 19.1 A - Reduce the Number, Duration, and Impact of Work Zones (20-54)
Objective 19.1 B - Improve Work Zone Traffic Control Devices (55-80)
Objective 19.1 C - Improve Work Zone Design Practices (81-92)
Objective 19.1 D - Improve Driver Compliance with Work Zone Traffic Controls (93-109)
Objective 19.1 E - Increase Knowledge and Awareness of Work Zones (110-122)
Objective 19.1 F - Develop Procedures to Effectively Manage Work Zones (123-134)
Outline for a Model Implementation Process (135-135)
Overview of the Model Process (136-138)
Implementation Step 1: Identify and Define the Problem (139-142)
Implementation Step 2: Recruit Appropriate Participants for the Program (143-144)
Implementation Step 3: Establish Crash Reduction Goals (145-145)
Implementation Step 4: Develop Program Policies, Guidelines, and Specifications (146-146)
Implementation Step 5: Develop Alternative Approaches to Addressing the Problem (147-148)
Implementation Step 6: Evaluate Alternatives and Select a Plan (149-150)
Implementation Step 7: Submit Recommendations for Action by Top Management (151-151)
Implementation Step 8: Develop a Plan of Action (152-153)
Implementation Step 9: Establish Foundations for Implementing the Program (154-154)
Implementation Step 10: Carry Out the Action Plan (155-155)
Implementation Step 11: Assess and Transition the Program (156-157)
Section VII - Key References (158-164)
Appendixes (165-166)
Abbreviations used without definitions in TRB publications (167-167)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 146
SECTION VI--GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN Implementation Step 4: Develop Program Policies, Guidelines, and Specifications General Description A foundation and framework are needed for solving the identified safety problems. The implementation process will need to be guided and evaluated according to a set of goals, objectives, and related performance measures. These will formalize what the intended result is and how success will be measured. The overlying crash reduction goal, established in Step 3, will provide the context for the more specific goals established in this step. The goals, objectives, and performance measures will be used much later to evaluate what is implemented. Therefore, they should be jointly outlined at this point and agreed to by all program stakeholders. It is important to recognize that evaluating any actions is an important part of the process. Even though evaluation is not finished until some time after the strategies have been implemented, it begins at this step. The elements of this step may be simpler for a specific project or location than for a comprehensive program. However, even in the simpler case, policies, guidelines, and specifications are usually needed. Furthermore, some programs or projects may require that some guidelines or specifications be in the form of limits on directions taken and types of strategies considered acceptable. Specific Elements 1. Identify high-level policy actions required and implement them (legislative and administrative) 2. Develop goals, objectives, and performance measures to guide the program and use for assessing its effect 2.1. Hold joint meetings of stakeholders 2.2. Use consensus-seeking methods 2.3. Carefully define terms and measures 2.4. Develop report documenting results and validate them 3. Identify specifications or constraints to be used throughout the project 3.1. Budget constraints 3.2. Time constraints 3.3. Personnel training 3.4. Capacity to install or construct 3.5. Types of strategies not to be considered or that must be included 3.6. Other VI-12